Jump to content

NV in Former Affiliate Markets


JPSmith

Recommended Posts

I recall from the days of iPCS/Sprint squabbling that iPCS didn't have much PCS spectrum in many of its markets. E.g. this filing

 

http://www.secinfo.com/d11MXs.uJer.htm

 

indicates they held as little as 10 mhz of spectrum in a number of areas, including sizable cities like Peoria.

 

I was wondering how this spectrum situation will affect NV in the former affiliate markets, both availability of LTE and overall capacity expansion. I assume that the PCS spectrum iPCS controlled in these markets is all that Sprint has to work with now, at least until iDEN spectrum is re-purposed? Does this mean that some of these markets can't get the full NV treatment or may still have capacity issues post-NV? Might this lead Sprint to accelerate the de-commissioning of iDEN in these markets?

 

Sorry if this is a naive question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://people.ku.edu/~cinema/wireless/spcs_map.html

 

This does not include the 10MHz of G-Block PCS, in which Sprint has another 10MHz nationwide. Which it is using for a 5x5 LTE carrier. This file is quite dated, but is mostly still accurate. I don't know if Sprint has picked up more spectrum in Central Illinois. Perhaps if AJ (WiWavelength) wanted to weigh in, he probably would know the specifics about Central Illinois. Seeing how he created the attached map.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear not, Sprint has added spectrum in Central Illinois more recently than what is reflected on my old map. In 2008, Sprint acquired (from USCC) additional 10 MHz blocks of spectrum in the BTAs in Central Illinois that had been previously limited to single PCS D block 10 MHz licenses. See below:

 

Bloomington-Normal, Peoria, Springfield, Decatur-Effingham, Mattoon: PCS E block 10 MHz

Galesburg: PCS C block 10 MHz

Jacksonville: PCS F block 10 MHz

 

So, across all of Central Illinois, Sprint holds PCS A-F block 20 MHz of bandwidth plus the PCS "G" block 10 MHz licenses.

 

AJ

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent update, AJ. Thanks!!! :clap:

 

If you ever are up to the task of wanting to update the Sprint spectrum maps, I will be glad to do the graphic art and maps. You just have to prepare the data in a spreadsheet for me to work from. Let me know if or when you want to collaborate on the project.

 

I think I would make separate maps by block type, then an aggregated map with totals. Could be fun and a great new resource.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fear not, Sprint has added spectrum in Central Illinois more recently than what is reflected on my old map. In 2008, Sprint acquired (from USCC) additional 10 MHz blocks of spectrum in the BTAs in Central Illinois that had been previously limited to single PCS D block 10 MHz licenses. See below:

 

Bloomington-Normal, Peoria, Springfield, Decatur-Effingham, Mattoon: PCS E block 10 MHz

Galesburg: PCS C block 10 MHz

Jacksonville: PCS F block 10 MHz

 

So, across all of Central Illinois, Sprint holds PCS A-F block 20 MHz of bandwidth plus the PCS "G" block 10 MHz licenses.

 

AJ

 

 

Awesome, thanks much for the info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • I think the push for them is adding US Mobile as a MVNO with a priority data plan.  Ultimately, making people more aware of priority would allow them (and other carriers) to differentiate themselves from MVNOs like Consumer Cellular that advertise the same coverage. n77 has dramatically reduced the need for priority service at Verizon where the mere functioning of your phone was in jeopardy a couple of years ago if you had a low priority plan like Red Pocket. Only have heard of problems with T-Mobile in parts of Los Angeles. AT&T fell in between. All had issues at large concerts and festivals, or sporting events if your carrier has no on-site rights. Edit: Dishes native 5g network has different issues: not enough sites, limited bandwidth. Higher priority would help a few. Truth is they can push phones to AT&T or T-Mobile.
    • Tracfone AT&T sims went from QCI 8 to 9 as well a couple years ago. I'm pretty neutral towards AT&T's turbo feature here, the only bad taste left was for those who had unadvertised QCI 7 a couple months ago moved down to 8. In my eyes it would have been a lot better for AT&T to include turbo in those Premium/Elite plans for free to keep them at QCI 7, while also introducing this turbo add on option for any other plans or devices. As it stands now only a handful of plans can add it, and only if you're using a device on a random list of devices AT&T considers to be 5G smartphones.
    • My Red Pocket AT&T GSMA account was dropped to QCI 9 about a year ago.  Most recently 8 for the last few years prior.  Voice remains at 5.
    • https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/05/att-announces-7-monthly-add-on-fee-for-turbo-5g-speeds/ Hopefully we don't ever see T-Mobile do something like this. Based on how I was treated with my Credit Limit, it's definitely not the same company it was before the merger, and it's entirely possible they'd try it.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...