Jump to content

utiz4321

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    1,688
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by utiz4321

  1. No, 3 members of the FCC come from the Presidents party and 2 from the opposition party. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. You read indignation into that? That is running along way from the words. Has or has not sprint has an awful record, both in a relative sense (compare vzw) and in an absolute sense (missing their own dead lines)? I think there is an objective case that sprint has historically struggled to execute network plans. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. I didn't think ATT was that close in spectrum holding to sprint. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. Did they ever add china? If not that is a big one they need to add. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. There has to be a meme out there on sprint's coming weeks, months, years etc... line. Lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. Well, hopefully it is actually "cool". Sometimes what sprint thinks is cool and what is cool isn't exactly the same thing. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. If they acquired dish they would have the same problems. They would Still need a massive spend on capex and no resources to pull it off. A T-Mobile merger still offers the same advantages: scale, infrastructure, expanded coverage, etc..... if ATT's media strategy is successful the future maybe a three way merger. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. Same thing happened to me, but on two separate 5x5 channels. It is really bad, but in my case an apartment building was put up right next to my home tower killing my line of sight. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. My understanding is that 5g is mainly going to use higher frequency spectrum that 2.5. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. At this point Sprint's two year plan should have as much credibility as the old 5 year plans of the Soviet Union.
  11. Dont root for google to take over sprint. Google does most things half assed, out side of their core products. Keep in mind what happened when they purchased Motorola. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
  12. I called it two days ago. Their plan is to bluff network improvements (small cells cost less and will give use the improvements we need to maintain competitiveness), starve the network (lowering capex) to improve balance sheet (ie pay debt coming due). Short run good ( no default cash positions stay good), long run bad (network starts to have problems again). Markets are forward looking, they know capex is key to sprint maintaining subscriber growth in a way that will grow revenue and free cash flow. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
  13. I think sprint's plan is to bluff improvements, starve the network as much as possible and improve their balance sheet. In the short run, good for stock price. In the long run bad for the company. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
  14. You can't starve the network. The net additions are good news but they won't be able to keep this up if the network isn't fed. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
  15. I don't know why a 10Mhz wouldn't be useful to any carrier at the right price. Sprint doesn't want to spend the money on it, that is the bottom line. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
  16. I think they will after densification. One benefit to densifcation is that it will take users off b26 and thus allow them to turn up the power and not have b26 work at a crawl. Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...