utiz4321
S4GRU Premier Sponsor-
Posts
1,688 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Everything posted by utiz4321
-
An ass. I really do hate NIMBYs, they are usually the first to complain about coverage but they complain about the infustructor need to get coverage. No one sees cell towers unless they are looking for them. Besides, they don't look any worse than powerlines. They should be ignored. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
No it is not like roads. Roads cant be monetize that is why they are public good. The is no reason why fiber cant be monetized and it is successfully. They are not public goods, if you are in happy with the lack of choice you or wireless companies like sprint have blame the right people, your local government. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
I don't know how that would fix anything. The number one cost to running fiber is the government, just ask google. That is why had cities bid for google fiber, so they could hold local regulatory cost down. Just image if the government ran it and some politician had to choose shutting down part of a major city's road system during an election year. Not to mention all the other public choice problems. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
You missed the point I was making. The years before NV was conceived was years of Sprint spliting CAPEX between 3 technologies, weakening their core CDMA network to the point it was not longer competitive and a wimax network that wasn't nation wide. This forced sprint into a position where NV was the last hail marry play they had left. It was even described at the time as a "bet the company" play at the time. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
That was the other cool part about these things, he said that the network would be able to optimize them remotely so that would interfere with each other. He later said that with 2.5 and millions of cell sites sprint has a competitive advantage. It is hard to make sense of that "millions of cell site" comment without sprint planing on a million or so of these things being pumped out. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
I think it is VZW. Sprint doesn't seem all that interested in buy new spectrum. Sent from my LG-LS993 using Tapatalk
-
We are the same as vzw where we have service and priced the same isn't really a good selling point. Vzw has service in more places. I am trying to think of a reason a general consumer who choose sprint over anyother carrier. I think the "it works for me campaign" is a perfect example of what i am talking about. What does that even mean? Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk