I have been with Sprint since 2000 and since then I have endured the seemingly endless "4G" promises, so I completely understand the frustration. I do, however, agree with irwinshere on this one. This isn't a platform for bashing Sprint since this community is a community made up entirely for tracking progress of those aforementioned "4G" promises.
One of my co-workers is a Sprint subscriber right now (iPhone) and complains all the time. When I told him about LTE starting to light up in the area (he lives near me too) he was unimpressed and touted how great Verizon's 4G coverage is. Their map is certainly impressive looking ... and sure, they did have LTE presence in this market (at least in the Akron subset) before Sprint -- but many I know with Verizon have tons of complaints that they barely get 3G speeds on their devices even when they have full signal. I've heard similar from AT&T and T-Mobile subscribers.
T-Mobile has a very aggressive and ballsy Marketing campaign going ... offering to pay ETFs from other carriers for switching. I, for one, am not going to miss all those who think the grass is greener on the other side. Leaves our new, long-awaited LTE network for the rest of us to enjoy.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions. Do I think Sprint has handled their 4G implementation the greatest? Heck no, but they were also bit by a few snags outside their control. I think with the backing of SoftBank, Sprint is on the right path. Only time will tell whether NV is all it is cracked up to be ... and Spark is an even bigger question mark. But I'll take visible progress when we've suffered for so long with none.