Jump to content

TechSmurf

S4GRU Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by TechSmurf

  1. Nope. Campus is state land, no building permits. We won't have any idea anything's going on with it until someone catches a crew working on it or it's accepted.
  2. That'd be it. (River/Alvernon was the only spot on sensorly that seemed obvious a week ago)
  3. Yes, we do still need samsung lte engineering for that site. Thanks for the attempt
  4. Yuma's good for now Remember, if you see an ID that isn't on the map now, it's a new site!
  5. That's most of Yuma! Need PCIs for: Yuma 8th/8th, Drexel Heights, Bisbee, River/Alvernon, Oracle/Orange Grove, 1st/Glenn Need GCI for: Nogales, Drexel Heights, Bisbee, 6th Ave/I-10, 22nd/I-10, Broadway/Harrison
  6. Serving cell. Each site has one per sector 169 apart. I.e. 32/4th you got 19 for sector 1. Sector 2 is 188 (19+169), 3 is 357 (188+169). Gotta admit I like the hex ids better, but complete data is still preferred and I'm personally stuck with the Samsung version. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
  7. So far they're just small islands of fringe signal, but you're welcome to go grab engineering screens anyway
  8. Yuma's Pacific tower is fully identified now. Still need PCIs for A/32, B/20, and 8th/8th. (You sank my battleship!!)
  9. Sensorly or it didn't happen. Btw, there's lte in Bisbee of all places now per sensorly. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
  10. I saw some talk of this earlier in this thread, but it seemed a bit back and forth... Are current Cyanogen builds allowing signalcheck to populate GCI/PCI info from Samsung handsets?
  11. Awesome! That's the first physical ID I have for anything in Yuma, though, so I couldn't use it to confirm a new site broadcasting. I need engineering screens from a Samsung device for the other 4 too. Hypeo has submitted a unique hex id for that site, though, so we do know it's up and running.
  12. With this I can confirm the earlier posted ID for river/alvernon is different. Thanks BTW, SignalCheck has a GCI field on HTC devices, it seems. This is all I'm looking for. You don't really need to dig into engineering if SignalCheck is displaying it
  13. Sad truth. Most workplaces don't have a cool IT manager who sets up a separate virtual guest wifi network for employees to use for their personal devices... Now if only my employees would realize I'm still not going to let them look at porn at work... Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
  14. Specific locations of accepted sites are available on my sponsor map. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
  15. Interesting track popped up on sensorly from someone on eastbound I-10 near Ruthrauff. It's faint, but it seems to be pointed the wrong direction to be fringe signal from a known site. Someone (*cough*newgrounds*cough*) should investigate the area N/NW of this track.
  16. Sadly I can't do much with this data yet, since we still don't have hex IDs for 1st/Glenn Yes, we still need samsung serving cell IDs for River/Alvernon.
  17. Well, for one, someone should REALLY go map river/alvernon area... and get LTE engineering screens.. for the other, these signal patterns are pretty telling (they weren't quite distinguishable from broadway/harrison a few days ago, but they're solidly suspect now)
  18. Alright! Well... everything I suspected has been LTE Accepted... even the one I suspected so faintly that I didn't even mention it.
  19. Lte engineering screenshots from near each active tower would allow us to better verify new towers coming online in the future. See link in my sig. Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
  20. Good stuff, Jeff! I've got a small to-do list still running if anyone's bored: Tucson HTC/LG/iPhone folks: We've only got hex IDs for the new tower at OG/Oracle. If you're bored I could use 'em for the rest. Tucson Samsung/iPhone folks: We don't have confirmed serving cell IDs for that new tower, Park/18th, or the one in Drexel. Yuma Samsung/iPhone folks: We've got hex IDs for everything, but we don't have serving cell IDs for anything. Not a big deal if Hypeo is going to be the only person handling this... Southeast AZ folks: I hope people are running Sensorly in Santa Cruz and Cochise County.
  21. There are many areas still without, not just SE. I think the wilmot gate has good odds of being high on the to-do list.
×
×
  • Create New...