Jump to content

danlodish345

Honored Premier Sponsor
  • Posts

    3,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by danlodish345

  1. Exactly I couldn't agree with you more. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  2. Another close up shot.. quite a bit of noise in the picture Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  3. How much is it Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  4. Yeah they even to me it does feel slightly artificial all together. But the wide-angle lens is really a champ. And I see very minimal distortion with the wide-angle lens compared to LG. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  5. The one on the right is the telephoto lens zoomed all the in the middle one is just the main ones and the one all the way on the left is a wide-angle lens. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  6. I actually disagree. Mine came with the screen protector and it works just fine :-) but then again everyone's mileage will vary. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  7. I don't disagree with you. I totally agree with you 600 megahertz plays a very key role with T-Mobile's 5th generation Network. I've seen many documentation of where the millimeter wave petered out very early and with little trivial things like rain and leaves. So yes I do agree with you once again that 600 megahertz is mission critical for the future for T-Mobile. Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
  8. I'm not concerned about 5th generation coverage. For 1 all I care is that my phone has a consistent usable connection. I don't care about millimeter this millimeter that speed this speed that. The only thing I care about is it consistent reliable connection where I live and work and play the most. Speed is meaningless to me to an extent. All I care about is being able to do the stuff I do on my phone with a reasonable time frame. Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
  9. I preordered mine I should be getting mine in a few days or so
  10. It's been awhile since I've encountered any errors like that Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
  11. I can definitely say though that even though Sprint only has two carrier aggregation deployed on the large cell site in town it flies it goes pretty quick it easily keeps up with Verizon. So Sprint has definitely turned up the back haul.
  12. Is there really any way to prove that eliminating a competitor would really help consumers? Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  13. I'm here because I'm interested in seeing what happens. So I'd love to see what happens. If Sprint can keep moving forward on its own and hopefully keep bettering their Network then I'd like for them to prove me wrong. But only time will tell and obviously the decisions they make they well obviously impact the company. But only time will tell and I'd like to see what happens. I'd love to be proven wrong. I'll say that. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  14. Well I can also say that the South part of my town disturbingly lacks consistent band 41 coverage. And I am disappointed in Sprint none the less. So the one thing I do have to say is that in my eyes I do see them at fault too because if use their money to acquire Nextel they wouldn't be in this situation. Nor if they upgrade using that silly WiMAX technology that was more prevalent at the time. So Sprint in their own way borked themselves out of having decent low band Spectrum Holdings to build a proficient Network. Unless they can somehow dig themselves a this I will not see them as anything more than urbancore cell phone carrier. Also I'll say this once again as well Sprint waste so much money on silly gimmicks like those stupid robots and those ridiculous advertising campaigns. I mean okay I get it that advertisement is needed to obviously bring brand awareness. But wasting billions upon billions that could be poured into the network to expand it and even maybe a slight chance of acquiring some decent 600 megahertz Or so. So I still see this as Sprint fault. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  15. Sprint made so many bad moves it crippled their ability to build out an efficient Network outside of urban areas. Where I live it's very urbanized and yet only two miles off the highway the network goes from great to piss poor. Swiss cheese to the point where there is roaming Holes well within their own native footprint. It's sad. But this is all Sprint's fault for sitting out all of these auctions. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  16. No they never played in the AWS auctions. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  17. Band 71 expansion sighted in South Jersey Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  18. Potato Girl Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  19. Yes over here there's many of those nimbys so grid density here for all carriers unfortunately does suffer. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  20. Is your town also against cell sites? Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  21. Noted. Also yes I prefer stable release software I have tried beta software over the years and the gist caused me nothing but problems. But hey I'm glad it worked out for you. Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  22. That's why I don't mess around with beta software Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
  23. I think the person loses service. Sent from my SM-T837T using Tapatalk
  24. Actually if TMobile can continue to expand coverage that would be absolutely fantastic. And not just rely on roaming agreements. As you just said roaming Agreements are pretty expensive. So it would really be and the new carriers interest in building out new coverage. Obviously that's a very expensive and complicated process logistically. So I would really like to see what would happen. Sent from my SM-T837T using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...