Jump to content

LTE Fragmentation(any "hopefully" a solution)


Recommended Posts

There are currently a total of 43 different LTE band classes in the world. Very likely, more bands classes will come into fruition in the future. However, many of these band classes are somewhat redundant. Here's one such example.


Band Class 2 covers the U.S. PCS Spectrum bands(at least most of them). Band 2 covers frequencies 1930-1990MHz on downlink and 1850-1910MHz on uplink. This is the FCC’s PCS A-F blocks.

Around the time Sprint announced the EVO 4G(April 2010), Sprint requested a band extension from the 3GPP for Band 2. They asked for this so that it can also cover the G block(has you might know, is what Sprint’s LTE network will operate on at launch). The extension was eventually approved, but it ended up creating a new Band #(in this case, Band 25). This is not a true extension of Band 2, but pretty much covered what Sprint requested.

Band Class 25 covers the frequencies 1930-1995MHz for downlink and 1850-1915MHz for uplink.



As you can probably forumate from above, Band 25= Band 2 + G Block.


I can understand that creating a new band class does help prevent confusion on if a device supports a certain frequency, or that manufacturers can just create new devices using the newer bands instead of the older ones that covers less possible networks.

The thing is that LTE is young, new, and still adapting to the world's different frequency blocks across the globe. Band classes will continue to grow for at least the next few years. Some carriers may opt to buy new spectrum and deploy LTE there. Other(like Sprint & T-Mobile USA) would refarm and use spectrum they already own.

This makes building a multi-carrier device a bit of a pain at this time since most devices are incompatible with other networks, even one within a close MHz range. One example is the 700MHz spectrum in the U.S.(which will be discussed in another article)


One solution I see for this is the true extension of band classes to include new bands. For this, I would opt for all band classes to be given “draft” status, along with a revision label be given to every time a new request for an extension of a band class is approved instead of a new band class number. For example, Band 2 & 25.

With the addition of a spectrum block to band 2, instead of creating Band 25(or 26 or etc.), use a revision marker for the same band class.

So if in 2010, PCS bands(without G block) for LTE was called Band 2, PCS w/G Block would become the new Band 2. A revision number would be associated with each small change to the band along with “draft” status to the class number, but all future devices w/ this band number will include the updated frequency range. After a few years, the band class would be finalized and no additional changes can or will be made. This will prevent redundant band classes, intentional use of older bands(anticompetitive practices), and excessive phone revisions of the same phone(no more “one size fits one” and more “one size fits many”).


I’ll end this write-up with the growing possibility of LTE roaming in the near future. South Korea carrier’s SK Telecom & LG Telecom(LG U+) currently operate their LTE networks at 800MHz(Band 5). Sprint has just received approval for Band Class 26(an extended Band 5 to support ESMR).



If both the Korean carriers decided to sell new devices with Band 26 support along with Sprint, could this be the beginning of internationality compatible LTE devices?



Sources: Niviuk(http://niviuk.free.fr/lte_band.php), 3GPP(Band 25[http://www.3gpp.org/.../RP-110804.zip ]

Band 26[http://www.3gpp.org/.../RP-120305.zip] ), Engadget, LG U+ (Korean[http://www.uplus.co.kr/])

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Checked and downloading a 1.6 MB Google Play System update.    Still reflects June 1 after. 
    • Rinse and Repeat: T-Mobile Tops 3rd Party Network Report Yet Again https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-dominates-ookla-performance-report-two-years-running
    • The options to ignore GCI/NCI/PLMN/TAC are buggy.. working on resolving it. NSA cells are probably not being logged for most users yet.
    • Boost Mobile – the Newest Wireless Carrier – Launches New State-of-the-Art Nationwide 5G Network, Plans and Branding https://about.dish.com/2024-07-17-Boost-Mobile-the-Newest-Wireless-Carrier-Launches-New-State-of-the-Art-Nationwide-5G-Network,-Plans-and-Branding I'm really digging the relaunch of the brand. The new app is a lot better than before in that it actually feels like they're going a more premium route. The BoostOne app tried to gamify wireless service by making you want videos or download games in order to get discounts on your bill. Now it's decluttered and basically only account management. It's perfect. I was on a promotional $25/month unlimited plan on Boost Mobile and I just switched to the new $25 forever plan which is pretty much the same as before, the only exception being that now I'm price locked. The only thing I wish they'd do is start using QCIs instead of throttling once you use up your allotment of "premium data". I understand that they don't have as much capacity as the big 3 and that they're super reliant on AT&T and T-Mobile outside of major metros but hitting 30GB and being throttled to 512kbps is not competitive. They then try to charge $30 for an extra 10GB of high speed data. The big 3 and their prepaid brands have basically given up on hard throttling and use prioritization instead. They should consider doing the same. The next step for them is getting their name on Apple's websites this fall when the new iPhones drop. That's some of the best advertising a carrier can have. Instantly millions of people will learn that Boost Mobile is an actual carrier if they can pull that off.
    • Use cloud features or backup files first before updating with this firmware.  I updated my S24 Ultra with this update.  T-Mobile and Verizon network esims worked fine.  Dish Rainbow sim appeared to work fine.  Right after that, when I rebooted to another non-public test esim which previously worked fine, I got the Samsung Welcome screen.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...