-
Posts
607 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by milan03
-
-
Two points:
1. I found this rural T-Mobile upgrade today.
https://twitter.com/...3957248/photo/1
This is a recent upgrade so if Legere is saying that he isn't doing anything regarding rural areas, that's double talk.
Hey that's Flexi BTS! Not sure why is it at the bottom of the site. They're usually mounting it at the top. Interesting!
-
Well if it's anything like their "Nationwide 4G" claim, apparently not too much.
I don't think that's a public number. Only thanks to Robert we have a privilege to see Sprint's numbers but it most cases they aren't amazing either.
-
I don't disagree with anything you're saying, but I guess maybe what some might take issue with is the wordplay. They're basically saying that they're not going to put you in a contract with an ETF like their three "evil" bigger brothers. BUT, if you decide to cancel after say 4 months, cough up $400 promptly please but we aren't calling it an "ETF". Now, it's nice that they give you some flexibility in how much you put down and/or how much you pay towards it each month. However, until the phone is paid for, there is a ETF component there, but they just aren't calling it an ETF.
It's not ETF because you can actually turn in your phone after 4 months, and they'll give you fair market value for it that'll go towards the remaining balance. Now if you wanna keep the phone, that's a different story.
-
Wahington got super pissed at T-Mobile for claiming that their plans were no contract. In fact, when you cancel your service there is no ETF, but you have to pay off the remaining price of your phone, which is very similar to an ETF, or in some cases, will be more than the ETF of carriers that offer contracts.
Not sure what's there to be pissed at. If you're financing a phone at 0%, with minimum monthly of $20, you shouldn't expect that you're gonna be getting something for free. Pay more than $20 and your phone will be paid off sooner. Or if you don't like the service, cancel within 14days and return that phone.
Gotta pay for that phone man!
-
That's mandated by LTE-Advanced and not by Carrier Aggregation.
It's actually been mandatory for LTE since Release 8 which improves spectral efficiency over DC-HSPA where MIMO isn't mandatory, and most operators don't bother deploying.
-
I thought that DC-HSPA+ and LTE CA devotes the same percentage of subcarriers to guard bands no matter whether you have 2 channels by themselves or two bonded channels. So where are the efficiencies going to come from?
Mandatory 2x2 MIMO + OFDMA.
-
Keep your Sprint line, get a $30 prepaid plan and test T-Mobile along with Sprint. Test and compare both, and decide yourself.
I'm already seeing Sprint LTE all over Manhattan though, not just Bronx/Harlem/Uptown.
-
2
-
-
Oh this is very interesting!!!
-
Oh that's Verizon's new HomeFusion offer... It takes a few easy steps to install it on your roof... And it totally blends in.
-
3
-
-
Yet another "ME TOO!!!" PR cry, promising bunch of nothing. After trying to steal T-Mobile's HD Voice thunder, they're doing exactly the same with Google...
Can you tell that I despise AT&T? lol
-
DC-HSPA+ also requires twice the spectrum bandwidth of 5 MHz FDD LTE. T-Mobile is using spectrum profligately, just throwing everything and the kitchen sink out there and seeing what sticks.
AJ
Absolutely agreed. And especially in markets with 30Mhz of AWS and HSPA+21 already deployed in PCS, having 20Mhz dedicated to HSPA+42 and only 10Mhz to LTE, makes little sense to me. You can have about the same capacity with two HSPA+21 channels in two different bands.
Not to mention that the download throughput in a 5Mhz FDD layer is on par with HSPA+42.
-
Its easy to think you are the fastest when the Tmobile LTE network is not loaded. Those speeds are impressive but Sprint had similar LTE speeds when the first 4 markets were released.
As I said, I've seen better speeds out there, T-Mobile's are certainly not that impressive, but I've never seen a better latency on any US carrier. I think that latency is remarkable, most likely due to improved core and antenna integrated radios.
-
-
Technobuffalo had 3 articles testing different phones on T-Mobiles LTE network.
Here is a summary of the speed differences:
iPhone - Download: 32.32Mbps Upload: 13.57Mbps
Note II - Download: 57.99Mbps Upload: 20.16Mbps
HTC ONE - Download: 27Mbps Upload: 11.52MBps
Why is a big difference between the HTC ONE and the Note II.?
I don't know how many test were run, and if these are averages, but it doesn't look good for HTC to be the slowest.
It's really odd and I have no explanation but my guess is that, again T-Mobile had set up 2x10Mhz LTE in a controlled, indoor environment, and maybe that Note II was closer to the base station? Other than that, all three phones were tested in the same location in NYC which is BTW T-Mobile's 2x5Mhz market... And iPhone 5 btw is known for having pretty solid RF characteristics, so I'm puzzled.
Also, I'm kinda getting tired of all the tech writers that are getting paid to cover these events, and none of them ask these questions, or at least fire up FieldTest mode... I'm really fed up with the amount of irrelevant and false reports covered by mainstream sites like The Verge for example.
Gah... I'll just stop here
-
For what it's worth, Verizon's upcoming AWS LTE network will probably cover 80% of what T-Mobile's LTE (AWS) network will end up serving, with not GPRS, EDGE or even HSPA+ but actual LTE (in 700 upper-C) serving as a fallback. Now Verizon's speeds may not match T-Mobile's two years from now when both carriers have 20x20 AWS LTE deployed (I won't be surprised when 100M down, 50M up tests roll in from T-Mobile's side), but that's not due to T-Mobile's inherent network superiority. It's because Verizon will have more subscribers using AWS LTE than T-Mobile; Verizon is 3x T-Mo's size last I checked.
That said, I don't have a problem with T-Mobile having higher speeds than VZW due to its lower subscriber cou nt. Keeps them on their un-carrier toes.
Verizon is actually going to have 2x20Mhz AWS LTE this year in quite a few markets. They don't have to wait for any merger to finalize, for refarm to happen, they could deploy 2x20Mhz as a secondary LTE carrier today in NYC for example.
They have contiguous 40Mhz of AWS (A+B block) just sitting and waiting here.
So I'm expecting to see 100Mbps, or 150Mbps (with Cat 4 UE) coming from Verizon much earlier than T-Mobile, most likely H2 2013.
-
Oh you're very welcome! Credit given where credit is due.
Thank you for your great app!
-
3
-
-
-
I think you think too often!! I'll put it on the list.. man its hard to keep you happy!
-Mike
What I'm thinking is that your app is already awesome, and I have positive thoughts about this whole thing.
My thought could enhance your already great app.
Just a thought
-
1
-
-
That seems like a good idea, I will try getting that in there in the near future. Thank you for the suggestion!
-Mike
I've been thinking how cool would it be if the app had the ability to log time + amount of time connected to LTE.
When phone is in silent mode or late night when LTE is usually being tested by carriers we usually miss this opportunity to ever know that our area is being worked on.
Just a thought...
-
The radio in the picture is a NSN FXFB running GSM and 1900 umts antennas are normally Andrews TMBXX_6517-A2M's
I assume AWS UMTS and LTE is also supported with the same setup.
-
I would also love to know the model of those panels. I'm guessing these aren't NSN Liquid Radio, as those are rumored to be delayed, but the BTS is definitely their Flexi.
I'm pretty sure T-Mobile isn't acquiring 700Mhz. They're 99.9% PCS + AWS.
-
1
-
-
That's a T-Mobile's top rack, using NSN equipment, that box between the middle Antenna and a guy on the left is NSN Flexi Base Stations. That's a Release 10 capable array.
-
3
-
-
Thanks for the update Mike! The app is close to perfect! Good job!
-
1
-
-
I experienced the same thing at work last week. The tower has been listed as having LTE complete for the past couple of weeks but I could never connect. LTE signal would show up in the app, but the phone would never connect. Today, I was able to connect to LTE for the first time. My guess is that when the towers are blocked, the phone still picks up the signal, it just can't connect.
It's probably because at the early stage of LTE deployment and testing, only RF engineers are provisioned to authenticate to LTE network for testing purposes, most likely with different APN settings. Once that LTE cell site is properly set up and tested, they open it up which would explain why we sometimes see LTE network, but are unable to connect with our commercial equipment and default APN.
-
1
-
Next group of rumored cities to launch Tmobile LTE
in General Topics
Posted
Here is from Google plex in Mountain View, CA...