Jump to content

RyanThaDude

S4GRU Member
  • Posts

    49
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by RyanThaDude

  1. For months I've been complaining on CellMapper about DISH Wireless's (313340) current method of obtaining its gNB is incorrect, where sites are split between gNBs, mismatch sectors, and other general errors. Today I mapped several of DISH's sites on SCP and it also seems to be using the same method as CM.

    Without having to re-type everything out again, here's the post on Reddit I made on r/CellMapper:

    I'm not proposing this is official by any means, but it does make much better sense than what is being used right now. Thanks!

    • Like 3
  2. 1 hour ago, mikejeep said:

    I have B5 as 17/27/37/47/57/67 (dec) from @Trip but that's the only confirmed B5 data I have received. The 15.. 16.. 18.. 19.. examples do not conflict with anything else I have noted, so all of those might be accurate. Have you definitively confirmed each of those? I can't wait for the day when every device reports EARFCNs.. @david279 mentioned above that Samsungs are reporting on the Oreo 8.1 preview which is huge.

    Yes, it's been confirmed. These are the cells I found a few days ago, which are on CellMapper. Thankfully my N6P got the EARFCNs since the S7E didn't. I saw that post and gave a slight glimmer of hope for Samsung but considering I'm on VZW I'm sure they'll neuter it because, well, that's what they do best.

    1 hour ago, mikejeep said:

    Keep me updated.. I just have to be careful to assume that something deployed in one market is going to hold true elsewhere (i.e. T-Mobile's mess).

    Done & done! Definitely understandable. I'll be doing some more digging around and let you know what I find.

    1 hour ago, mikejeep said:

    NSG is not a good comparison, because they do not use native Android API methods, they communicate directly with the modem using routines not available to anyone else. It results in great data, but for now it's not the type of information within my reach. But I should be able to do anything CellMapper is showing -- could you give more details? SCP should show the same data.

    Fair enough about NSG, but CellMapper will mostly show the same info as well. Here are a few screenshots of my N6P showing the cell data from my network extender in NSG, CM, SCP, and Android's phone info screen. While the device is rooted, CM isn't using it so I can only assume that's it's getting the data via the API. Again, this was just a thought since it would allow capture of data without or with a bad SIM.

    1 hour ago, mikejeep said:

    Sure, so GCI like FAxxxxxx / FBxxxxxx? Can you confirm any other details? PLMN 311480 I assume? Nobody has mentioned them.

    I have an extender (311480, yes) that's currently using the first three hex of 0FB, and a few in the area as well (same ID, different sector), but it was once assigned 0FA a few months ago. By default they use B13, but they can be configured by Big Red to use B4. Sadly, since my S7E doesn't capture EARFCNs, I'm unable to determine if there's a difference in B13 and B4 IDs. Only a select few were able to get captured by the N6P and they were all B13.

    Cheers!

    • Thanks 1
  3. @mikejeep, a few things:

    I'm starting to notice in my area (Chicago/NW Indiana) that Verizon is deploying Band 5, but SCP doesn't display it as such, but without anything other than LTE. The ones in my area are using 16, 26, & 36 (decimal) and was confirmed on my Nexus 6P with NSG and matched up with my Galaxy S7 Edge (no EARFCN :wacko:). However, I've noticed elsewhere while browsing CellMapper that B5 has several other sectors such as (15, 25, 35), (18, 28, 38), and (19, 29, 39). Unlike B4 (and maybe B2?) where there are second carriers, these appear not to be as such as I haven't seen any sites with two different B5 sectors. So far I haven't noticed any correlation on the assignments but as soon as I find more data, I'll hopefully see it.

    I've also noticed while browsing that there are sectors assigned (72, 82, 92 - B4) and (74, 84, 94 - B2) along with the normal macro-style numbering in the San Francisco area, which appear to be a small cells. To what I've notice so far a site can have three different eNB numbers, but are seem to be treated as sectors. For example, I've found 3 cells with different eNBs but the same PCI (38032, 338032, 638032). The only difference is the starting number (0, 3, 6). Along with the B5 issue, I'll be doing some research on this as well.

     

    Last thing, would it be possible to be able to get the cell data in SCP without being actually connected to the network, much like NSG or CellMapper does? I'm using a Nexus 6P that has a SIM issue and in those apps I can still see cell data, although from different carriers. I use it frequently along with NSG to lock bands to determine which carrier(s) are at a site, although it can be unpredictable. Adding the ability to have SCP do this as well would be extremely useful. Maybe, have it be an option to turn this feature on/off.

    Thanks as always, Mike!

    EDIT: I also forgot to mention that there's also something that could be added is Verizon's Network Extenders (femtocells). So far the ones I've found all start with the hex FA and FB. Many units share the same eNB but have different sectors. Could those be added as well?

    • Like 2
  4. Ahh. If you enable full logging for SuperSU for CellMapper (while it's closed), then run CellMapper for a minute and exit, then go to SuperSU, it should have logs. Look for the lines saying "cat /dev/______". Whatever that _____ is is the appropriate device name to give SCP.

     

    Sent from my Pixel XL

    Doesn't work that way unfortunately on my N6 with Nougat. b1650dffbae57cd9fdf13fcf0d5c0d8a.jpg

     

    Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

  5. Out of curiosity will the newer versions have Verizon's LTE Band 4 identification, in what I can only assume it's second carrier? I'm noticing quite a few sites in certain markets in my region are using them. They are just identifying as "Verizon" w/o a band. So far everything else is identifying perfectly, including Verizon's LTE Band 2. 

     

    Band 2: 0E,18,22

    Band 4: 0C,16,20

    Band 42: 0D,17,21

    Band 13: 01,02,03

  6. Since I started testing my fix for this "bug" it's certainly seeming more and more like this is not a bug at all, but intentional behavior by Android 5.0+ devices, most often when connected to a weak LTE signal. The only "bug" is that the current release of SignalCheck does not display the GCI (which, in turn, causes other issues, like band identification and site note entry/display). But my fix does appear to be solid and ready for release. The only thing holding up an update is the new EARFCN features, which I'm close to finishing.

     

    -Mike

    If it means anything when I disable VoLTE or when in an area where it's not supported on my Nexus 6 on VZW the "bug" appears. I found this out a few months ago when I was in an area where US Cellular owns the CDMA market and VZW was deploying new LTE sites. AFAIK Sprint doesn't use VoLTE, so not sure there.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  7.  

    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   0 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd0
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   1 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd1
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  11 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd11
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   2 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd2
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  21 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd21
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  11 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd22
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  27 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd27
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   3 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd3
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  36 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd36
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   4 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd4
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   5 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd5
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   6 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd6
    crw-rw---- 1 bluetooth net_bt_stack 230,   7 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd7
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   8 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd8
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,  25 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_cxm_qmi
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  28 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_data_0
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  27 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_logging_0
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  30 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_pkt_loopback
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  24 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_sns_adsp
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  21 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_sns_dsps
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  26 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd_test_framework
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  12 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev0
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  13 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev1
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  14 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev2
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  15 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev3
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  16 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev4
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  17 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev5
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  18 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev6
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  19 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev7
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  20 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcnt_rev8
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   0 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl0
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   1 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl1
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,   9 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl10
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  10 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl11
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   2 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl2
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   3 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl3
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   4 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl4
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   5 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl5
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   6 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl6
    crw-r----- 1 radio     radio        229,   7 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl7
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  23 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl8
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,   8 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smdcntl9
    
  8. Why is it that sometimes the app doesn't report which band you're on??

    My device is a Nexus 5x

     

    abe90088aea84371080c8c59f2e59eda.jpg

     

    Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

    I know there's a lot to see in this thread but it's been discussed quite a bit. I can only guess it's a bug, but I think it can also happen when VoLTE isn't supported or working at the site. I'm on VZW so YMMV.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  9. On my N6

     

    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   0 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd0
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   1 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd1
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  11 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd11
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   2 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd2
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  21 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd21
    crw------- 1 root      root         229,  11 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd22
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  27 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd27
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   3 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd3
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,  36 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd36
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   4 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd4
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   5 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd5
    crw-rw---- 1 system    system       230,   6 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd6
    crw-rw---- 1 bluetooth net_bt_stack 230,   7 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd7
    crw------- 1 root      root         230,   8 1970-03-21 05:14 /dev/smd8
    
  10. This happens to my laptop a lot and there is a nice video on YouTube that I use to fix it. Just look up burn in fix and leave the video running for a bit.

    I'm going to assume that video is for a stuck pixel on an LCD screen. We're referring to screen burn on OLED screens, which can be similar to screen burn on old CRT (tube) screens.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  11. So today while my phone was sitting on a white screen loading an app, I noticed that the SignalCheck Pro logo and text has burned into the top left corner of my Galaxy S5's screen. I didn't think burn-in was a problem on modern screens.

     

    But I think it speaks to the amount of time SCP runs on my phone. :)

     

    - Trip

    Same here on my S5. Didn't notice it on my Nexus 6 yet.

     

    Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

×
×
  • Create New...