atomic50

According to the spec, the Sprint Moto X (2014) should be model XT1092 with specs below: GSM/GPRS/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700 (AWS), 1900, 2100 MHz); CDMA (850/1900 MHz); 4G LTE (02, 04, 05, 12, 17, 25, 26, 41) It appears it will work on all major US carriers except Verizon similar to the Nexus 5!

Good point with SVLTE. That leaves the couple million non-Big 3 Canadian mobile providers holding 700 MHz C1 blocks. Maybe later re-certification is possible too.

LTE Band support includes 2, 4, 5, 7, 17, and 29 so its definitely an AT&T variant. I can't find the document which details the LTE Carrier Aggregation pairs unless its under short-turn confidentiality.

Please chime if I am getting terminology wrong. Thanks! I have generally observed 3 types of NSN T-Mobile cell sites: 3 panel: quad 2x AWS LTE, quad PCS GSM/HSPA+, legacy dual AWS HSPA+ 2 panel: quad 2x AWS LTE, hex with PCS GSM/HSPA+ and AWS HSPA+ or hex 2x AWS LTE and PCS GSM/HSPA+, quad PCS GSM/HSPA+ and AWS HSPA+ 1 panel: hex with diplexer for 2x AWS LTE, PCS GSM/HSPA+, AWS HSPA+ Therefore, the options for low-band deployment is swap out the legacy panel on the 3 panel site, swap out a low-band hex panel for the 2-panel site, or add a low-band panel to any of the site configurations. For Ericsson AIR21 sites, there is currently one active PCS HSPA+/GSM and passive AWS HSPA+ plus one active AWS LTE and passive mid-band empty. There is a new wider, 1.3M short (not 2.4M tall like the AT&T AIR21 being deployed) low-band compatible AIR21 that just passed the FCC that would be a sensible swap. The extra AIR21 could then be salvaged for a good chunk of sites that were not fully modernized. All in all, nothing like the massive 12 panel, 33 RRU cell sites AT&T is stitching together.