lou99/maximus1987

According to ookla they do. And in the end only one metric matters: net postpaid PHONE adds, not tablet giveaways. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm curious how smooth the transition from volte to EDGE voice was. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Did you ever get full bars of lte? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Even if the max was 1mbps, from a TMO user who's experienced 0mbps on gprs - maps dont load - this is still a massive improvement. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I meant USC Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Do you think then WHEN that link 'melts', they'll do proper fiber?

What's the typical max speed for that kind of backhaul?

fixed your quote

Does the fact that us cell is upgrading their stuff make it more or less desirable to sprint, vzw Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ok but what?Docsis? Anything else has to be fiver or microwave + fiber. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm on TMO but I think I'm objective and recognize the fact that sprint will inevitably surprise TMO in speeds. But when you try to explain this to TMO fan boys… it's like trying to convince someone their religion is wrong. No go. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Then what's the backhaul? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Are they bringing FTTT to their sites? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nah just rurals. Their coverage is disparate as hell. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Us cell is not coming on the market anytime soon http://www.phonedog.com/2015/03/31/us-cellular-reveals-2015-4g-lte-plans-including-addition-over-600-cell-sites U.S. Cellular says that it will add more than 600 4G LTE cell sites in 2015 and expand existing LTE service in 10 states. The 10 states that’ll see additional U.S. Cellular LTE coverage are California, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oregon, Vermont, Virginia, Washington and West Virginia. USCC says that more than 2,000 new cities will get 4G LTE, and that by the end of 2015, 98 percent of U.S. Cellular customers will be covered by its LTE network. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hills Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is it significant that TMO's upload is higher than download? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What's interesting though is that TMO speeds are equal to sprint. If TMO barely has any towers then shouldn't their avg speeds across the blue tested area be away low? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Why would you rank att higher than sprint? ATT is only starting WCS deployment mid-2015 and they've stopped-ish their small cell deployment; they're outta gas. They'd rather invest in their dividend than their network.

Amen. They took away the signal gradients and gave us hexagons. Which we already had with rootmetrics. WTH?! #UNunCarrier They only did this to hide their coverage weak spots.

According to http://www.spectrumgateway.com/t-mobile-spectrum-holdings TMO in Odgen has: AWS: 20 MHz fdd PCS: 15 MHz fdd They're probably still running 5x5 lte.

If they're gonna say "lte-advanced", why not just also say "carrier aggregation"? Throw us a bone.

4 carriers with 300mil native lte. USA! USA! USA! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

In a high tax state in a high tax city?That'd be a big clue they're clueless. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A testdrive program like TMO's - but longer - would be a good boost to sprint's fortunes. The non tech crowd believe sprint sucks so no way will they transfer their number to test sprint but a "burner" phobe num with zero cost? Why not? That could almost be sprint's slogan. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk