-
Posts
36 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by DerekKY1980
-
-
A CDMA monopoly isn't really possible because of the large number of CDMA operators in the country. There are still super-regional operators that offer CDMA service. Also, in the marketplace, CDMA is considered a technology of limited scale. The disappearance of CDMA would not be nearly as problematic, since there are no markets outside of the United States where CDMA is the dominant technology (or even used anywhere near how much GSM/UMTS is). Verizon Wireless, for example, is planning on exiting the CDMA ecosystem within the next 8 months. Remember a monopoly is only such if it is deemed valuable. The CDMA ecosystem has been losing value over the last five years, and continues to do so.
I guess that makes sense. And you are right Verizon said they would get rid of it by 2021 If this does go threw I really hope they switch off CDMA and go direct to HSPA+ cause here in KY it seems T-Mo has more 2G coverage than Sprint and if it goes ALL HSPA+ then might make better coverage between the 2 for all of Kentucky according to a map I've seen T-Mo covers about 80% of Kentucky with 2G where as sprint covers about 20-30% with 2G (just guessing here not actual facts lol)
-
I have a question... someone mentioned that the AT&T/T-Mo merger failed because it would make a GSM Monopoly if Sprint/T-Mo merge wouldn't it be the same? I mean they would have to either go CDMA or GSM if they go CDMA then wouldn't AT&T have the GSM monopoly after all and if they go GSM then wouldn't Verizon have a CDMA Monopoly?
With that being said I think the Merge would be a great Idea IF they bring somebody from T-Mobile to help them convert CDMA to HSPA+ like T-Mo is doing (or going to do) with Metro with NV 800/1900/2500 LTE along with w/e T-Mobiles is would be pretty fast I would think especially if they get the 700Mhz from Verizon. I do know they would have to sell some of T-Mobiles Spectrum but even so the 700/800/1900/2500 would work nicely.
-
Some areas didn't have enough sites and it created small islands of voice networks. Other areas were covered enough but they blocked them anyways. It's an Ericsson thing you'll never understand.
created small islands? not sure what ya mean like they had alot of networks instead of 1 whole network? as for the not enough sites I do know what ya mean by that my WHOLE county only has 4 towers on Sprint
-
And really tricky.. Downright impossible to connect to 1x800 in most Ericsson markets since they have them all blocked.
Why do they have them blocked if they are adding to them? just wondering
-
btw tgrgrd00 as far as I know I am 1.35 miles from the tower on Sam Jones LN off Oak Hill Rd.
-
LOL I just saw that myself right before I saw that u replied like I said in the 1st post I signed up awhile back and at the time was on Verizon I switched to Sprint on Oct 31st/Nov 1st cause I got tired of paying $80 for 500MB when I could pay the same price to Sprint for unlimited and have the iPhone 5c now tbh I don't like it lol
-
Ya I called Sprint about this and the guy said the tower hasn't been upgraded to 800Mhz for LTE but 800Mhz for voice. has however coverage has not improved so i'm just wondering if they are on crack LOL or just don't know what they are talking about
-
Hi I am kind of new here signed up awhile back but never posted but I have a question regarding the engineering screen
I am connected to Band 25 (1900?) Sprint said that 800Mhz LTE was turned on on a tower on Sam Jones LN in Somerset KY 42501 which I am about 1.35 miles from the tower if 800Mhz is turned on shouldn't the band say 26? or 25, 26? I didn't read thru the 100 some odd pages so if this question has been asked I do appologize
WSJ: Sprint looking at T-Mobile purchase
in General Topics
Posted
well I guess so I just went by an app called CellMaps my area is really bad on Sprint my signals fluctuates between 1 and 3 bars up and down at my address go east a bit and it's worse