shocker45

are you including the mass acceptance of cdma 800 in that? that might skew the numbers.

it will be interesting to see where they are in 2 months. theyve got to have abt 35,000 done now.

it does seem like I've seen a slow down in site acceptance in the last couple months. interesting to see if that continues due to the issues you listed.

is sprint sitting on a bunch of completed sites in a lot of larger markets?

it seems hard to believe theyre going to have the upgrades completed in 2.5 months when its taken them this long to get to 75% in places like LA and New York and 56% in Cincinnati.

entire state of ohio seems like a mess and is lagging behind

nice to see those towers light up with LTE finally

how does the N5 compare to the lg g2 as far as network performance?

@dkoelwer abusive behavior? thats quite the escalation. next I will have e-killed someone.

in that thread I was just being "direct."

if you guys dont want to acknowledge that something is wrong with ur info in this instance, fine.

you guys say its covered. I say it isnt. sensorly says it isnt. and ive physically been there. those are the facts.

lol yea. realistic to compare that map to sprints. obviously you have no clue abt the area, its traffic, or coverage. use ur semantics however you like. doesnt change the facts.

1st I have not been disciplined for anything. Not that has anything to do with this. I'm skating on thin ice because ur rude? Thats rich man. I love ur logic.

i have been talking abt lte the entire time if that wasnt clear.

So you look at an area like Wichita which has been widely mapped and you see a major area that has high traffic with an apparent hole in LTE And ur first response is to try to discredit me. To say I must not know how sensorly works or act like I'm the only person here using sensorly. While possible that is unlikely. Ask yourself what's the most likely reason there is no LTE coverage in the areas? The answer is not because of phone problems.

Its obvious you have no idea what's happening on Webb and obviously since the McConnell tower hasn't been upgraded Thats why there is no LTE coverage on south rock. I'll research that McConnell tower more.

I dont think there is any reason to act so arrogant. the idea that its a handset problem for 13th and webb not showing coverage is a joke.

you refer to your maps. I'll report real world coverage.

if you consider areas where it's .02 mbps speeds as covered then we shouldnt even talk.

rock rd and webb are mapped weekly if not daily.

to bag on sensorly for being crow sourced when thats basically what your maps and info are is pretty lame.

I wish the top and bottom bezels were smaller thatd cut down on the overall size of the phone.

rumored to be available from carriers mid march. we'll find out soon.

does anyone know what other data sprint will give preference to over data from ppl on framily plan?

s5 is rumored to be available from the carriers starting mid march. thats what I read.

im in a lot of places.

we'll see for lte 800

have you looked at the areas I listed on sensorly?

according to sprint they dont have towers within a couple miles of either of those spots.

3 months until lte 800 starts getting turned on in wichita?

will not becoming to the usa until april. carriers have not been announced yet. article quoting lg execs on phonearena.com

thx guys. I understand there are some outliers, maybe even 3000, sites that will be stubborn. thats why I said essentially. still if you had the current total and the avg completed weekly you'd be able to come up with an estimate. which to me would seem a lot better than saying "we have no idea."

how do you figure they're covered?

whats up with the lack of coverage in wichita around 13th & webb and rock & 47th st south? is sprint just not going to add towers to these areas?

I think if youre out of contract you can.

Do we have an approximate date on when 1900 LTE will be essentially completed? It seems like they're accepting abt 350-400 LTE sites a week on average. If they currently had around 20,000 LTE sites done that'd put completion at abt next Feb or March +/- a couple months.

Very rough guesstimate on that 20,000 number.

have you guys considered that this may have been confused with the lg g pro 2?

Will LTE 800 be able to be turned on fairly quickly at sites already broadcast ing LTE 1900 with the correct backhaul? or is that more related to the spark rollout?

how many problem sites are there? 5%, 10%?

is it safe to say 50% of the country is facing backhaul issues?

this might not be the best thread to ask but will the connection rule for LTE 800 be the same as for CDMA800?

with most of the markets at or even significantly below 50% completion (they do have some large markets with 60 or 70% or more completion) for the LTE portion of the upgrade do we have any idea when the 4G (not talking spark) portion of the upgrade will be completed?

just based on how things have gone it would seem to me that we're at least a year away... thats my anecdotal assessment.

wondering what you guys think?

@bmoses thanks.