Jump to content

shocker45

S4GRU Member
  • Posts

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Phones/Devices
    flip
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    south
  • Here for...
    Friends

shocker45's Achievements

Member Level: Digital

Member Level: Digital (4/12)

3

Reputation

  1. are you including the mass acceptance of cdma 800 in that? that might skew the numbers.
  2. it will be interesting to see where they are in 2 months. theyve got to have abt 35,000 done now. it does seem like I've seen a slow down in site acceptance in the last couple months. interesting to see if that continues due to the issues you listed.
  3. is sprint sitting on a bunch of completed sites in a lot of larger markets? it seems hard to believe theyre going to have the upgrades completed in 2.5 months when its taken them this long to get to 75% in places like LA and New York and 56% in Cincinnati. entire state of ohio seems like a mess and is lagging behind
  4. @dkoelwer abusive behavior? thats quite the escalation. next I will have e-killed someone. in that thread I was just being "direct." if you guys dont want to acknowledge that something is wrong with ur info in this instance, fine. you guys say its covered. I say it isnt. sensorly says it isnt. and ive physically been there. those are the facts.
  5. lol yea. realistic to compare that map to sprints. obviously you have no clue abt the area, its traffic, or coverage. use ur semantics however you like. doesnt change the facts.
  6. 1st I have not been disciplined for anything. Not that has anything to do with this. I'm skating on thin ice because ur rude? Thats rich man. I love ur logic. i have been talking abt lte the entire time if that wasnt clear. So you look at an area like Wichita which has been widely mapped and you see a major area that has high traffic with an apparent hole in LTE And ur first response is to try to discredit me. To say I must not know how sensorly works or act like I'm the only person here using sensorly. While possible that is unlikely. Ask yourself what's the most likely reason there is no LTE coverage in the areas? The answer is not because of phone problems. Its obvious you have no idea what's happening on Webb and obviously since the McConnell tower hasn't been upgraded Thats why there is no LTE coverage on south rock. I'll research that McConnell tower more.
  7. I dont think there is any reason to act so arrogant. the idea that its a handset problem for 13th and webb not showing coverage is a joke. you refer to your maps. I'll report real world coverage. if you consider areas where it's .02 mbps speeds as covered then we shouldnt even talk. rock rd and webb are mapped weekly if not daily. to bag on sensorly for being crow sourced when thats basically what your maps and info are is pretty lame.
  8. shocker45

    LG G Pro 2

    I wish the top and bottom bezels were smaller thatd cut down on the overall size of the phone.
  9. rumored to be available from carriers mid march. we'll find out soon.
  10. does anyone know what other data sprint will give preference to over data from ppl on framily plan?
  11. s5 is rumored to be available from the carriers starting mid march. thats what I read.
  12. im in a lot of places. we'll see for lte 800 have you looked at the areas I listed on sensorly? according to sprint they dont have towers within a couple miles of either of those spots.
×
×
  • Create New...