Jump to content

bm92708

S4GRU Member
  • Posts

    12
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bm92708

  1. You don't seem to understand the bureaucratic red tape that carriers have to jump through in order to get permits for stuff like this. Many cities don't like cell towers because they are "grotesque" in visual appearance compared to a standard city skyline. In those cities, there is more red tape to fight with, and extra engineering that has to take place in order to secure the permits necessary. Take Henderson, NV for example. They hate cell towers, and many of them are "stealth" sites that have to be done a certain way, i.e. monopalm, monopine, "flagpole". So you see, Fresno is one of those picky cities, and as Oedipus has posted many pictures of, the RRU's are on racks by the equipment cabinets because of the extra expense of making fake trees bigger or flagpoles that can't fit the RRU's.

    Yep, that's Fresno!  We can have downtown continue to look like hell because of old laws, bridges from the freeways to roads going no where except to homeless encampments, prostitutes and their pimps taking over strips of motels, but HEAVEN FORBID WE HAVE "UGLY" LOOKING CELL TOWERS!!  

    • Like 1
  2. Yea the "signal bloom" changed after they placed the new hardware. Where I live (between Biola and Kerman) we are getting the worst service ever because of the new alignment. We are now roaming constantly. Luckily the 800mhz will have a bigger throw distance and everything should work peachy when the new hardware is actually lit up. But until then I hope Sprint don't mind paying the roaming charges! :lol:

    I spoke with a customer service rep and I told them about being affected by the update with slow data speeds and they said they would make note of it. I have no idea if that will change anything but we will see. I guess we all we have left to do is wait for the upgrade to finish. Great reporting as always bjarabian! Thanks!

×
×
  • Create New...