Jump to content

tyroned3222

S4GRU Member
  • Posts

    1,481
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by tyroned3222

  1. Most of it was discussed at conferences the rest is pretty much just basic stuff.. tmo decommissions the sites you get a tmo sim and if you’re device is compatible than you will be on tmo network.. band 4/2/25/26/12/66/71 will be the LTE network.. band 41/band 71/mmWave will be the capacity/coverage for 5G as stated by Neville. The main priority will be the integration of customers as soon as possible Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  2. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tmonews.com/2018/12/t-mobile-cfo-talks-plans-sprint-network-following-merger/amp/ So, say you’re city is up. They decommissions sprint network than you will be placed on tmo lte grid with a compatible device. The fastest way to add capacity to tmo grid is to integrate band 25/26.. Neville has stated at conferences that he plans to use all of band 41 for 5G and leave his current lte network as a fall back until its time to refarm Also, 36 million still need to be migrated over to compatible devices.. good luck with that Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  3. It’s all on the the new tmo website that T-Mobile is “applying the same philosophy” with the Sprint merger as it did when it acquired MetroPCS. “The playbook that we did with Metro, it wasn’t combining two networks. It was shutting one network down and extracting some assets (from) that network to enhance the T-Mobile network,” he said. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  4. This is the Customer/ network integration plan.. been public for a while now for anyone that curious Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  5. The anti-trust could provision the new tmo to divest spectrum if they don’t live up to the target goals Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  6. The only thing is although they are aligned .. Fox buinsess is reporting the DOJ wants more concessions Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  7. Yup, but those promises really don’t mean much .. the new tmo will have more money and could just check that off as a business expense cost of doing business.. if they don’t hit their target goals Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  8. The only way sprint can pull it off .. they have to dedicate more TDD spectrum towards the actual upload without using CA. Like they were doing with with the earlier configuration. That’s what I think hes talking-about Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  9. This is more newer and he is the only one that makes the decision and can overrule everyone from the staff . https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-dojs-delrahim-still-open-113929330.html Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  10. I do not see this scenario happening!! The DOJ staff cannot sue without Makan delharim .. the White House made a clear statement today they want this deal to happen ( I know it’s getting very political) but I’m expecting Makan to approve the deal in the 48 hours just my opinion of course. But the DOJ and states will struggle to win in court really don’t have a case Admin economic officials still support deal, believe merger presents no antitrust concerns. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  11. And I think that would happen if T-mobile backs out of the deal. I’m very positive that T-mobile has no intentions of doing so Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  12. Only the fcc has a shot clock deadline which they will meet .. the doj can take as long as they want they have no shot clock or deadline. This thing could do on for years if they sue Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  13. No, the fee is only in Place If t-mobile backs out of the deal first.. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  14. Based on reports stocks are taking a hit. The pressure is now on Delrahim to announce how he feels ( thanks to the internet lol). He can overrule the staff, but if he agrees to sue.. the spotlight will be on t-mobile and sprint to see if they allow a definite delay until this matter can be resolved in court.Allowing, Verizon and att to continue with their plans!! As everything comes to a halt with t-mobile and sprint other than their regular network plans Att/Verizon stock have also taken a hit on this news today Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  15. Ya, this is unprecedented and the doj will struggle to win in court, but the time this will take Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  16. Same thinking here : Masa: what are you thinking at the moment ??? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  17. Well, I hope everyone has their coffee ready lol Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  18. DOJ seem to be undecided, but even if they approve it is looking like ny and California AGs are on board to sue if doj gives approval. With a few more states on board they would fully have the resources to fight this merger without the backing of the fcc or DOJ!! Hang tight this could get ugly fast Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. DOj doesn’t deal with concession it’s the FCC.. there is even a huge penalty to pay of some sort if the new tmo doesn’t apply by the terms reached.. If the reports are true and not put out by career people that are salty.. than the DOJ really just can’t accept the us going from 4 to 3 carries .. is that a strong enough case to hold up in court? Maybe not, but it will sure make sprint/tmo think about if they wanna spend more time on this in court or do they back out Penalties for broken promises So what happens if the New T-Mobile fails to deliver on any of the obligations outlined here? In their letter to the FCC, T-Mobile and Sprint say they'll agree to an "unprecedented" amount of verification and enforcement. "Failure to meet New T-Mobile obligations will trigger severe, increasing, and continuing voluntary contributions that will make failure prohibitively expensive and incentivize New T-Mobile to meet its commitments," the companies said Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  20. If the DOJ firmly believes that this merger goes against the Clayton act they will create a case and push the ball into tmo and sprints court to see if they want to fight in court or if they back out Basing this on the Clayton act: there is really no price protection for the consumer After 3 years prices are a fair game maybe even before 6 months in a major shake up in upper management is already expected to happen. After merger is done, there isn’t really anything to hold them accountable Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  21. If the DOJ wants to sue and if the reporting is accurate. It’s not because of concessions those comes from the FCC ( the DOj has no clue about spectrum etc..) it would be simply just an anti-trust/ Clayton act issue ( the doj just not accepting the us to go from 4 to 3 carriers) and a hard one to overcome if the reporting is accurate.. If DOJ sue ( this time based on the lose against att) I think they have a strong case to win and it will be up to sprint and tmo to see if they wanna spend resources and time fighting in court Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  22. That’s in areas where sprint has no or little to no service.. if you turn this on everywhere to offset congestion and such it would be tough to do... i guess the small areas where sprint has coverage where tmo doesn’t it would work Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  23. No, I think that would be a RF nightmare with sprint and tmo on the same towers and close by Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  24. This deal is done imo.. now just waiting on the doj Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...