tyroned3222
-
Posts
1,481 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by tyroned3222
-
-
Someone has filed a motion to stop the merger review for the time being.. to review spectrum totals on per market basis. Just wanted to let everyone know
Let's see what the FCC does the last thing we need is for them to postpone even longer
Although is does give Sprint more time to work on the network
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
I was about to say the same. The combined company is going to have a around a 110 thousand combined sites.. T-Mobile in the public filing stated that they will only keep 10, 000 of Sprint sites to boost density and capacity.. the rest of the sites to equal the 85000 the new T-Mobile is going to newly buildTmobile has 65,000 total sites including many many DAS nodes inherited from MetroPCS that I've come across. They do not have by themselves 65,000 macro sites. It's closer to 45-50k range.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
Ya, I have asked myself that question a few times lolI wonder why Sprint waited until now to push out all of these software upgrades to the network?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 2
-
Ya, I'm sure on a bigger scale there are a few more then we would like out thereSprint still hasn't finished El Paso?!? I know there are a few sites that haven't been touched in West Texas (SW of Monahans and between Van Horn and Fort Stockton), but if this site is in the immediate El Paso area, then this is just....[emoji52].
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
It's Sprint old legacy 3G equipmentMaybe old Cricket CDMA?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
Quiz of the day : what tower equipment is this ? Lol
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk -
Yes and root uses Samsung phones so they could of likley used the calling plus featureI would normally agree with you but that happened over a year ago with the second band 25 carrier.
Ill do do some tests today to see what is on 1x and 3g.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
The small cells that Sprint has been adding on their stores... Here in my market they have about 14 of them.. those are doing to 2xca band 41.. can those small cells also do higher uplink?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk -
-
Drastic change in Albuquerque.. Sprint more then doubled speeds in the 2nd half of 2018.. with more work on the way.. wow
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk- 5
-
I don't think anyone is anti merger.. 1st not 1 carrier currently at this point is bringing 5G to other areas other then the city that we're annouced and even in those cities its questionable how widespread it will be so your argument on that part is irrelevant.. 2nd. Massive Mimo isn't cheap to install, so that would happen over time. Sprints brand is showing signs of live again in the last few Quarters nothing crazy, but it's somethingI dont think so. It is onky being deployee in urban cores. Not even suburbs are getting 5 g love by enlarge. If they were serious about building a 5g network 75 percent of their towers would be palmed for massive Mimo upgrades, as it is it is closer to a quarter. You anti merger people live in a fantasy world if you think sprint will be anything more than a metro or cricket circa 2013 if the merger doesnt go through.
P.s.. There brand is still trash compared to even T mobile worst year. And T-Mobile recovered after billions and years of rebranding. Where are those billions going to come for sprint?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
Your post is referring to scalability..volte will have issues just like any other carrier but Sprint can't afford to have that bad rep again so they're allowing you to opt out if it's really bad nothing wrong with thatIt also doesnt give them the resources to build out a 5g network properly, restore their brands or come up with a market place niche. I was asking back in 2014 why would someone buy sprint amd cam only come up with price. That is still the case. How is VoLTE going to work on their network across most markets? There is a reason people have to opt. Into it.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
I know the merge will be good on the technical side , but this is quiet starting to get funny to me .. how Sprint is able to regain a stronger network that fastWhat market?Louisville Kentucky boom
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 2
-
Opps, Minnesota 2nd halfWhat market?
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
[emoji15][emoji15][emoji102][emoji102][emoji102]
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk- 4
-
This time around it's different ( imo).. Sprint was very indecisive in the past( they only kind of Improved in those market and didn't go all out 100%).That’s a great point. We’ve seen this happen with Sprint before, where it would gain the lead in a flagship market like Chicago only to lose it after 6 - 12 Months as the other carriers catch up.
Is the pace of network improvements at this point primarily limited by available capex, available work crews or available equipment?
I hope they can bring some strand mounts or other rapid network improvements to the Bethany Beach, DE and Ocean City, MD areas. I was there several years ago and the network coverage was terrible. I currently have family there now on Sprint (with an S8+ and HTC U11) and they’re telling me it’s still terrible.
Sprint knows what's at risk and this time around i don't see them letting up.. at nextgencpu pointed out this was achieve pure spectrum and small cells.. so, Sprint celebrate this a few days and gets back to work.. running higher back haul, implementing 4x4 mimo, and massive is next and more aggressive throughout NYC.. I think this is only the beginning now Sprint will let loose
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
Yup and Sprint still has less user per site ... So the network should run very smooth and fast .. in a lot of cities all the Network needed in most cases was just getting tri band on their gridHonestly they have all the tools to really bring it with 5G hell even with 4G(we all know what happened there). They just lack scale which is going to possibly be a problem for 5G and density. If Sprint can get to together, I have no problem coming back for their 5G network cause I know they can outdo the competition and not have a crap ton of small cells on every other block cause of MmWave.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 1
-
I thought I'd do the honors lol and whats crazy this is only the beginning.. this seems to be their first real big push towards improving the Network across the Nation
https://twitter.com/SprintCTO/status/1030080324217102336?s=19
Still need the merger ?
Well, Sprint gets to check this one off as a big win
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
- 3
-
The trend continues for Sprint and improvmemts on rootmetrics.. more improvements in Oxnard CA , San Jose CA , Hawaii and
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk- 10
-
This is just sprint adding more fuel to the merger review.. I'm sure Sprint could continue to become a better business and continue they have this whole timeNeither am I, but since they insist that they can't compete successfully apart, if the merger isn't approved then it would seem to me that would be their only option if they want to survive.Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
I think the roaming aggremeent will be enough for now.. even offering roaming within city limits is a big deal imo and it looks like it will be treated as native coverage which will improve customer experience.That’ll be awesome. Then at that point, they’ll need to compete on price or the things that come included with your plan outside of talk, text and data.
Also why is it that T-Mobile is the only carrier who hasn’t announced their initial 5G markets? They said they’ll have 30 in first half of 2019 but there’s no list provided. It’s just kinda odd only because they’re always vocal about things.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
Yup in my marketI can probably agree with that. Sprint needs work in many cities. Which is what they are doing now but as a fallback in the case the merger falls through but to for better prep for 5G. This is really their chance to shine.Sprint : 60 macro sites
T-mobile : 156
It would take Sprint a long time to catch up to that macro count
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
I don't think that would be a problem for TMO that why 2.5 would work better on their grid .. I think Neville said that in most markets Sprint isn't even within 50% of their network grid and said it was worse in NYCThat MMWAve is going to require them to place small cells pretty close together just like what Verizon is doing. Sprint on the other hand honestly just needs a good sense grind along with their small cells. Their 2.5 travels far enough. From a network perspective in my eyes, Sprint would have the cleaner looking network within cities and not all these small cells every direction you turn.Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
But the again ... If the merger is approved I think combined they have enough midband to move everyone of off 2.5 and use that for strictly for 5GThey absolutely need to buy spectrum, but the type of spectrum will matter, it will be super interesting to see how it plays out.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
Marcelo Claure, Town Hall Meetings, New Family Share Pack Plan, Unlimited Individual Plan, Discussion Thread
in General Topics
Posted
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk