-
Posts
144 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Gallery
Downloads
Events
Forums
Posts posted by WiseGuy321
-
-
Have you been to the newer store in chestnut hill?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
That one has been there for a few years now. The Natick and Medford locations are new. -
They will have to be pretty methodical where they deploy it. I'm also sure during rush hour speeds will not be anywhere near this considering how much competing 2.4 they will have to contend with.
B46 uses 5Ghz spectrum. Not 2.4. -
By TMobile to make themselves look good
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
That doesn't mean it's doctored... -
Does this include free calling back to the US from South Korea during the OIympics? T-Mobile is offering free calling back to the US.
Looks like Sprint and TMobile have jumped on the bandwagon. Verizon was the first with free data for the Olympics. -
He is a T-Mobile schill but he in fact does work for Ookla and receives information that carriers typically have to pay for. He has authored or co-authored at least 5 articles for them.
Interesting! Guess he finally got hired!
He typically spends his time trying to drive traffic to his Cellular Insights blog...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
Milan doesn't work for Ookla. He's just a TMobile schill.Nope because the news came from Milan Milanovic who, as far as I know, actually works for Ookla. Sprint's average speed climbed to 23.9 Mbps from 14.5Mbps last November.Remember his Intel vs Qualcomm iPhone modem articles? He conveniently forgets to mention how he's sponsored by Qualcomm and has a working relationship with them.
People shouldn't take him seriously, unless he's quoting crowd-sourced data. His "laboratory" tests mean nothing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- 1
-
If they did that they could pass att on LTE as att doesn't have plans to add LTE to H+ areas.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
They don't? That's exactly what they're doing...
Especially with the upcoming FirstNet build.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk -
https://boston.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=968bcd0da75f44cca75298153b33ac7f
Here's a map of Mobilite sites in Boston.
- 7
-
11 minutes ago, Paynefanbro said:
So a lot of those have the potential to be Sprint small cells.
Most of them aren't (yet)
Sprint is on the Extenet oDAS nodes down Boylston + Newbury, but the rest of them are typically Verizon and T-Mobile.
All the Extent nodes in Brookline are Verizon-only. You can tell by looking on the side. They have Verizon stickers on them.
The North End Extenet nodes are Verizon too. Extenet + Verizon met with the residents a few months ago to propose their plans.
The majority of Crown Castle nodes in Dorchester/Mattapan are from MetroPCS, so T-Mobile.
- 2
-
https://boston.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=968bcd0da75f44cca75298153b33ac7f
The Boston Small Cell map just got updated with Mobilite locations (Dark Blue dots). Should be seeing them deployed soon.
- 1
- 1
-
VZW uses B13 not 17 which can't go any higher than 10x10. They can reframe to add B5, VZW also bought B66 there.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Correct. And Verizon has deployed 20x20 B2 and B4 across the entire NYC metro area. Only EVDO/1x left is on B5.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Looks like T-Mobile already has B71 up in some areas, even areas that I frequent up in the Northeast.
The timeframe is pretty impressive!
Quote9 months between the time the boundaries of band 71 got known (mid-January), band defined, network equipment and a flagship phone designed and installed/released to customers
- 2
-
Does anyone have an Apple Watch with LTE?
Can you make calls using Sprint's network? -
On 9/15/2017 at 2:25 PM, Paynefanbro said:
Harvard Ave in Boston at my barbershop
I feel like we might go to the same barber... haha
- 2
-
15 hours ago, red_dog007 said:
They will still have their regional provider who already provided their service.
USCC is also an option for those customers. They have fantastic coverage up in Maine.
-
10 minutes ago, nexgencpu said:
I work with one company that uses surfaces 4 and 5 exclusively for 200+ employees working remotely, and they have been awesome. Less than 5% of them have had issues.
Good for them I guess...
Apparently Consumer Reports recently pulled their recommendations for entire lineup due to poor quality and most of the comments on Surface subreddit seem to show similar issues.
I have no idea, they wouldn't give me one when I asked
-
5 minutes ago, Jones said:
Off topic but in all of the hospitals I've worked in - the truly high res diagnostic imaging, like what a radiologist uses, is done on a PC with big monitors in portrait mode. I've never seen a Mac in a reading room...aside from the radiologist's iPhone (which is being used to scroll through ESPN while working...) (that's a joke...sorta)
The workstations hooked up to the MRI/PET/etc are PC.
We use Macs in the reading room. Many of my fellow radiologists use Retina MacBooks (with dock + ext. monitor) and/or 4k/5k iMacs in our offices. IT has testing Surfaces, but hardware reliability hasn't been the greatest...
-
3 hours ago, greenbastard said:
If you need your phone serviced you have to make an appointment, which at times can take up to a week. Sure, you can always mail it in, but that means being without a phone for over a week and a half.
AppleCare has offered exactly what you want for years...
https://support.apple.com/iphone/repair/service/express-replacement
-
14 hours ago, JustinRP37 said:
It all depends on your use case. Apple definitely is great for computer and smartphone newbies, but it is still quite prevalent in scientific settings.
This is correct. In the medical world, I prefer Apple hardware. For example, the software I use to read scans is far better optimized for iOS/OS X than PC/Androids. I've used Windows desktops + laptops with high-res displays and there hasn't been a single one without image scaling problems across the OS. This is important because size + shape is used as a method of diagnosis.
Another example is as simple as looking through MRIs on my phone. If I'm quickly flipping through the scans, Android phones typically can't keep up. There is lag and choppiness. I experience none of this with an iPhone or iPad.
QuoteJust don't like when people bash people for their tech decisions.
These arguments are a waste of time. Why do PC/Android guys feel so strongly against Apple's ecosystem?
If people want to call me "tech illiterate" and a "sheep" for using the best tools to diagnose my patients, so be it.
- 1
-
23 minutes ago, kg4icg said:
Both my HTC's came with a Quickcharge adapter. You might want to do some research.
You replied to the wrong post, but yes, you are correct about HTC.
According to XDA, it seems that LG does not supply the newest Quick Charge adapter with the G5, etc.My point still stands with the likes of OPO and Motorola. Why not bash them for charging extra? Or is it cool to bash Apple for no reason at all these days?
-
12 hours ago, kg4icg said:
Well don't go breaking your iPhone, they jacked up the cost.
Interesting, but who else offers in-store replacements at the Genius Bar?
Google + Pixel? Nope
HTC? Nope
Samsung? Nope
LG? Nope
Even a company as large as Samsung doesn't offer flat-rate screen replacements for their products. There's a price to pay for superior customer service. Why are we acting like Apple is suddenly doing something different?
- 1
-
23 hours ago, Johnner1999 said:
Samsung has been increasing its prices prior to Apple.
This. The Note 8 is also nearly $1k...
- 1
-
14 hours ago, kg4icg said:
Paying extra for what android includes a standard, oh the Sheeple runs deep.
You seem very misinformed and quick to bash for no reason.
How is this any different from what Android OEMs do? These phones typically don't come with the Dash charge or QuickCharge bricks. All of that costs extra.
So it's ok for Samsung/LG/HTC/OPO/Motorola/etc to charge extra, but not Apple? Why the double standard?
-
2 hours ago, Arysyn said:
Maine doesn't even get very good broadband internet options either. I once considered moving to Maine, checked the internet options in both Bangor and Portland areas, wasn't impressed at all. They really need more high-tech there.
Meh, I don't think you understand how rural the state really is. Outside of Portland, Augusta, and Bangor (and all of their suburbs), there is no reason for 100+ mbps broadband.
Spectrum recently took over Time Warner and bumped up the residential broadband speed tiers to 60/10 for normal residential accounts. Before that, it would max out at like 15/10 in the areas I frequented.
Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)
in Markets
Posted
Here's the map
https://boston.maps.arcgis.com/apps/View/index.html?appid=968bcd0da75f44cca75298153b33ac7f