Jump to content

SMR vs cellular vs PCS vs AWS

dedub

By dedub
in General Topics

 Share

Recommended Posts

dedub Member Level: 4G WiMax

dedub

Posted
Posted

I don't think I've ever seen anyone explain exactly what those mean or what the differences in those labels are for.

 

I know they refer to (or are related to) the bands 800, 850, 1900 and 2100/1700, but why aren't they all simply called cellular instead of SMR, or PCS or AWS etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jefbal99 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jefbal99

Posted
Posted

I don't think I've ever seen anyone explain exactly what those mean or what the differences in those labels are for.

 

I know they refer to (or are related to) the bands 800, 850, 1900 and 2100/1700, but why aren't they all simply called cellular instead of SMR, or PCS or AWS etc?

 

They are acronyms...

 

SMR = Specialized Mobile Radio

PCS = Personal Communications Service

AWS = Advanced Wireless Service

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dedub Member Level: 4G WiMax

dedub

Posted
  • Author
Posted

So essentially, they are different communication protocols that are used at a particular bands, much like http vs ftp vs tftp etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Boosted20V Member Level: eHRPD

Boosted20V

Posted
Posted

So essentially, they are different communication protocols that are used at a particular bands, much like http vs ftp vs tftp etc.

 

I wouldn't say that. CDMA 1X is used across Cellular, SMR, PCS. LTE is being used across 700mhz, eventually Cellular I'd surmise, SMR, PCS, AWS. When the bands got auctioned off they got a moniker for a frequency range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
supert0nes Member Level: eHRPD

supert0nes

Posted
Posted

So essentially, they are different communication protocols that are used at a particular bands, much like http vs ftp vs tftp etc.

 

 

They don't specify the protocol at all.They are just names given to bands(grouped segments) of spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jefbal99 Member Level: LTE Advanced

jefbal99

Posted
Posted

So essentially, they are different communication protocols that are used at a particular bands, much like http vs ftp vs tftp etc.

 

Kinda, kinda not. Like you example, any service CDMA/GSM/LTE/EDGE/WCDMA/etc can be run over any of the RF Spectrum, they are basically buzz words that describe a spectrum band. They don't define what can or can't be used in the spectrum.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deval Member Level: LTE Advanced

Deval

Posted
Posted

I don't think I've ever seen anyone explain exactly what those mean or what the differences in those labels are for.

 

I know they refer to (or are related to) the bands 800, 850, 1900 and 2100/1700, but why aren't they all simply called cellular instead of SMR, or PCS or AWS etc?

 

For people in the industry, it just helps describe the bands in conversation. 800mhz has traditionally been known as Cellular, 1900mhz was known as PCS (hence Sprint PCS), 850mhz was SMR (even though the range is actually much wider and narrower than 850), and 2100/1700mhz, or AWS.

 

When I am speaking to people here, it helps instead of speaking in frequencies :).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
lynyrd65 Member Level: 4G WiMax

lynyrd65

Posted
Posted

I don't think I've ever seen anyone explain exactly what those mean or what the differences in those labels are for.

 

I know they refer to (or are related to) the bands 800, 850, 1900 and 2100/1700, but why aren't they all simply called cellular instead of SMR, or PCS or AWS etc?

 

The names are for their original intended purpose but to be true to their current use they would all be called AWS or Advanced Wireless Services bands.

 

Cellular 850 was licensed for the original analogue AMPS cellular network but is now used for 3G and 2G all-digital services and can be used for 4G.

 

PCS (Personal Communication Services) 1900 was licensed to add capacity for cellular carriers that needed more spectrum and for new competitors to offer wireless services. It is used for all-digital 2G, 3G and 4G services today.

 

SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) 800 was licensed to be used with two-way radios in commercial application but could also be used for cellular service. Originally it could only be used with small channels (like two-way radios used) but the FCC ammended the rules to allow wide-band operations. Effectively this rule change made SMR into an Advanced Wireless Services band in that it now supports wide-band operations like 3G and 4G.

 

AWS-1 (Advanced Wireless Services) (1700 Mhz uplink / 2100 downlink) - This band was specifically made for mobile broadband (3G, and 4G).

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WiWavelength Member Level: LTE Advanced

WiWavelength

Posted
Posted

What is different about aws 1, that the ul and dl are on different bands?

 

The 1700 MHz uplink and 2100 MHz downlink are not different bands. They are paired together to form one FDD band. A band is any defined set of spectrum.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites
briank86 Member Level: 3G EVDO

briank86

Posted
Posted

 

 

The 1700 MHz uplink and 2100 MHz downlink are not different bands. They are paired together to form one FDD band. A band is any defined set of spectrum.

 

AJ

 

Thanx for the clarification. Then to rephrase, what makes that the 2 are paired together? If used as in a TDD, would pairing no longer be needed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • dkyeager
      Dish Network/Boost Mobile cell/5G buildout thread

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • dkyeager
      SignalCheck Beta Crew Forum

      By dkyeager · Posted

      Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Nissan Coupe
    • Paynefanbro
      Network Vision/LTE - New York City Market

      By Paynefanbro · Posted

      Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...