Jump to content

So...which Sprint phone has the best RF quality?


Recommended Posts

So I don't think there was ever a real answer to the OP's question and now I'm curious too.

 

 

So...which Sprint phone has the best RF quality? Samsung GS3?

 

Possibly... GS3 isn't too good at 850mhz compared to other phones. I would assume the same as 800 too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I think I recognize some of those figures, too.

 

;)

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to add to the RF thing. Look at the numbers for LTE on the S3 and the Note2. I was in an area today trying to hunt down another LTE active site was seeing in the engineering screen. I kept dropping it on the Note2 as it was very fringe. I couldn't even get the S3 to find it. I could get the Note2 to connect but the speeds were mid range 3gish. Needless to say I was VERY impressed with the Note2 LTE RF performance which doesn't jive with these numbers. But of course these numbers are only part of the puzzle.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And just to add to the RF thing. Look at the numbers for LTE on the S3 and the Note2. I was in an area today trying to hunt down another LTE active site was seeing in the engineering screen. I kept dropping it on the Note2 as it was very fringe. I couldn't even get the S3 to find it. I could get the Note2 to connect but the speeds were mid range 3gish. Needless to say I was VERY impressed with the Note2 LTE RF performance which doesn't jive with these numbers. But of course these numbers are only part of the puzzle.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

If I'm not mistaken those are only rf transmit numbers which have no bearing on receive strength, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a direct correlation to the 'RF scores' and radio performance in most of the devices. But there were anomalies.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 on Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to think about when considering RF performance... Last week a field tech and I put a GS3, an iPhone 4S and an iPhone 5 side by side, put all 3 of them in test mode and got wildly different RSSI readings. We were standing in front of a legacy toy cell and all 3 phones hashed to the same carrier, so by the nature of the way CDMA functions, all 3 handsets should have the exact same RSSI, which should have been around -40, since we were 12 feet from the antenna.

 

With that being said, the dB level is based on a reference, and if that reference is different between chipsets, the RSSI will be inaccurate.

 

Also keep in mind that different phones hash to different carriers and the pilot power between the carriers can differ.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So based on your speadsheet, the LG Optimus G has the strongest transmitter?

 

Maybe... Not an FCC doc guru, or even baseband guru by any means. It was the numbers listed at which they tested things.

 

-- "Sensorly or it didn't happen!"

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's something to think about when considering RF performance... Last week a field tech and I put a GS3, an iPhone 4S and an iPhone 5 side by side, put all 3 of them in test mode and got wildly different RSSI readings. We were standing in front of a legacy toy cell and all 3 phones hashed to the same carrier, so by the nature of the way CDMA functions, all 3 handsets should have the exact same RSSI, which should have been around -40, since we were 12 feet from the antenna.

 

With that being said, the dB level is based on a reference, and if that reference is different between chipsets, the RSSI will be inaccurate.

 

Also keep in mind that different phones hash to different carriers and the pilot power between the carriers can differ.

 

Good point there about the reference causing the RSSI to be inaccurate....at least for comparison sake between different devices...

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • My s24 Ultras auto updated to April 1 security patch over night. Not on wi-fi.  Play system remains at March 1. No notice that update occurred on screen.
    • Got the latest update. On my S24 ultra the NR-ARFCN display remains constant (which is inaccurate according to diags) while n41 and 38 toggle back and forth.  I updated then rebooted before testing. Two sims active. My security patch level updated automatically to April 1 before this update. Diags sent while n38 was displaying.
    • Was able to install the March 1 Android security patch. Seems slightly more accurate with 5g ca band id, but can not swear by it. Updated google play system update through the software information screen to March 1. *#73# still works. Froze updates waiting on SCP update beta to fix n41 showing as n38.
    • Just installed it. Thanks for the info.  71 mb mar 1st date.
    • There's a permit for a new 47 story building at 205 Montague St in Downtown Brooklyn. The problem is that  T-Mobile eNB 48352 is on the building next door and this new building will block two out of 3 sectors of the site. For reference, the new building will be roughly as tall as 16 Court St which is right across the street. This site is the primary site covering Cadman Plaza so I wonder what the plan is. Will they just try to change sector placement, move to a different building, or will this just speed up the conversion of the Sprint site at 25 Monroe Place?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...