Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Boston Market (all of Massachusetts)


brendan4t

Recommended Posts

At MGH today and useable data 95ms ping 1.2 Mbps up .65 down

 

You can usually do better than that - it's always fast there (fruit street location, I am assuming).

 

What's strange is, EVDO Rev A actually shows higher peak speeds.

 

Same tower, same time, same location, EVDO Rev A can always hit between 2200-2600. When I switched to eHRPD, speeds topped out in the 1800's.

 

Very strange indeed. Watching the the speed test, it looks controlled. EVDO RevA will be a flat line of steady streaming data. eHRPD spikes around. There definitely seems to be some sort of traffic controlling going on. Obviously 1800 vs. 2500 isn't a HUGE difference, but still worth noting that eHRPD seems to have traffic management going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You can usually do better than that - it's always fast there (fruit street location' date=' I am assuming).

 

What's strange is, EVDO Rev A actually shows higher peak speeds.

 

Same tower, same time, same location, EVDO Rev A can always hit between 2200-2600. When I switched to eHRPD, speeds topped out in the 1800's.

 

Very strange indeed. Watching the the speed test, it looks controlled. EVDO RevA will be a flat line of steady streaming data. eHRPD spikes around. There definitely seems to be some sort of traffic controlling going on. Obviously 1800 vs. 2500 isn't a HUGE difference, but still worth noting that eHRPD seems to have traffic management going on.[/quote']

 

Is it possible that you are getting eHRPD from a different site than the EVDO at that location? Just thinking of possibilities.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible that you are getting eHRPD from a different site than the EVDO at that location? Just thinking of possibilities.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

I'll have a full comparative analysis tonight if you are curious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll have a full comparative analysis tonight if you are curious.

 

Great. FYI, CDMA Field Test will produce a handy log with each record listing connection type, signal strength, BSIDs, etc. You have to actually export the log to see all that detail chronologically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it possible that you are getting eHRPD from a different site than the EVDO at that location? Just thinking of possibilities.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

This is strange... eHRPD is, without a doubt, slower. It seems like it is capped around 1850 or so. Oddly enough, the uploads are faster.

 

When the speedtest first starts, it shoots past 2000, then bounces around, then sort of settles, stuttering at 1850 or so.

 

Pings are better though...

 

I need to finish testing and make sure that it is in fact the same site, which is likely, because the site is right outside my window and my signal strength is exactly the same.

 

 

eHRPD vs. EVDO REV A - Same exact site

7701927414_46f9e8beea.jpg

7701927738_54075395a8.jpg

7701928974_9d7f596eb1.jpg

7701925402_abaefce667.jpg

7701925848_30ea21e71a.jpg

7701926564_8faf2435ca.jpg

 

 

 

The other thing that is absolutely amazing is that eHRPD (as Robert has already said) is a totally different network. I was running some traceroutes and it's completely different.

eHRPD:

144.224.112.17

sl-gw20-hrs-10-0-0.sprintlink.net

109.598, 88.051, 87.868

144.232.7.133

sl-crs1-hrs-0-0-2-0.sprintlink.net

87.807, 91.134, 90.371

144.232.24.97

sl-crs1-nyc-0-6-0-0.sprintlink.net

90.187, 87.197, 87.075

74.125.49.212

74.125.49.212

69.312, 74.226, 74.104

209.85.248.180

209.85.248.180

73.493, 69.006, 66.809

72.14.239.252

72.14.239.252

71.174, 74.713, 68.151

74.125.226.228

lga15s29-in-f4.1e100.net

75.935, 80.268, 73.310

EVDO RevA:

144.232.18.206

sl-crs1-nyc-0-8-0-1.sprintlink.net

131.696, 126.263, 126.141

144.232.18.206

sl-crs1-nyc-0-8-0-1.sprintlink.net

145.247

74.125.49.212

74.125.49.212

127.789

144.232.13.42

sl-crs1-nyc-0-0-0-1.sprintlink.net

136.945

74.125.49.212

74.125.49.212

129.406, 154.463

209.85.248.180

209.85.248.180

156.112

72.14.239.252

72.14.239.252

132.214, 125.073

209.85.248.180

209.85.248.180

129.071

72.14.239.252

72.14.239.252

117.991, 94.613, 122.997

74.125.226.232

lga15s29-in-f8.1e100.net

103.616, 98.550, 106.852

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is strange... eHRPD is' date=' without a doubt, slower. It seems like it is capped around 1850 or so. Oddly enough, the uploads are faster.

 

When the speedtest first starts, it shoots past 2000, then bounces around, then sort of settles, stuttering at 1850 or so.

 

Pings are better though...

 

I need to finish testing and make sure that it is in fact the same site, which is likely, because the site is right outside my window and my signal strength is exactly the same.[/quote']

 

Have you noticed this phenomenon at several eHRPD sites? Its possible they are limiting core traffic as they are getting things online. With switches, each site was only connected to its dedicated switch. But with eHRPD and LTE, the network is dynamic. Each site can be routed to several different cores based on traffic. Its possible since only a handful of cores are complete and ready now, maybe they are limiting traffic? I don't know. Interesting.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you noticed this phenomenon at several eHRPD sites? Its possible they are limiting core traffic as they are getting things online. With switches, each site was only connected to its dedicated switch. But with eHRPD and LTE, the network is dynamic. Each site can be routed to several different cores based on traffic. Its possible since only a handful of cores are complete and ready now, maybe they are limiting traffic? I don't know. Interesting.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

I've never had any other sprint site just spit out such consistent speedtests (and I've looked). I don't think I could find another location where I can actually max out legacy hardware on a consistent basis. I really wonder how many EVDO carriers Sprint installed at this location because this is downtown boston - there is definitely traffic - but it NEVER slows down.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I've never had any other sprint site just spit out such consistent speedtests (and I've looked). I don't think I could find another location where I can actually max out legacy hardware on a consistent basis. I really wonder how many EVDO carriers Sprint installed at this location because this is downtown boston - there is definitely traffic - but it NEVER slows down.

 

Another thought...have you tried several speed test servers on eHRPD? The 4G core's connection to the backbone will be completely different than the switch. So the ideal server for each is likely to be different. Because they will have completely different routes to the internet.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another thought...have you tried several speed test servers on eHRPD? The 4G core's connection to the backbone will be completely different than the switch. So the ideal server for each is likely to be different. Because they will have completely different routes to the internet.

 

Robert via Samsung Galaxy S-III 32GB using Forum Runner

 

Definitely agree on the routing. The new switches have far superior routing... but the speeds stay the same. No matter what (good) speedtest server I use, the behavior is exactly the same.

 

Everything on eHRPD does the same thing - starts off bouncing over 2mbit, then just sort of jumps around and lands in the 1800 range or so. It wants to go faster, but it can't, heh.

 

I am thinking about taking a video so you can see, it's almost comical.

 

Maybe I'll hunt for some other solid sites around Boston. I am sure I can find one - I'll see if this is typical or not.

 

The other thing that is weird is my phone loses eHRPD all the time and falls back to EVDO REVA. I have to toggle to CDMA and CDMA/LTE to get it back. Not sure why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting 1200 down, eHRPD @ -98 dbm in Arlington MA. Signal isn't improved, but speed sure as hell is.

 

Another thing I just noticed is I'm pulling 3000 down on my airave. It used to be capped at 1500...

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just ran a speed test @ south station. Avg. 1.5 down .9 up. (eHRPD)

 

Last time I ran it which was towards beginning of this week, it was connected Evdo Rev A.

Actual speed did not change from when it was connecting Evdo. But glad to see another eHRPD site up and running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly off topic, but on topic. I'm glad people here are reporting these kind of speeds and user experiences. It makes this whole Sprint Network Project so worthwhile that there is real ROI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slightly off topic, but on topic. I'm glad people here are reporting these kind of speeds and user experiences. It makes this whole Sprint Network Project so worthwhile that there is real ROI.

So is our Roy (muffin man) not real?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is our Roy (muffin man) not real?

 

Sent from my EVO using Tapatalk 2

 

I don't get the joke.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speeds in Boston have been really bad lately. Just dying for 4g to light up on my phone. it does suck that right now i can barely use the internet if im in or around Boston. Def looking at it as a good sign that LTE work is getting done.

 

When I was last in Boston proper about 2-3 months ago 3G and WiMAX was blazing fast. I was pulling about 7-12Mbit/s down on WiMAX and 0.60-1.5Mbit/s on 3G which is more than adequate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was last in Boston proper about 2-3 months ago 3G and WiMAX was blazing fast. I was pulling about 7-12Mbit/s down on WiMAX and 0.60-1.5Mbit/s on 3G which is more than adequate.

 

Speeds in Boston are extremely variable. One site can be blazing fast, the next one over, extremely slow.

 

It's very strange.

 

WiMAX speeds are pretty good in Boston, but the coverage is swiss cheese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting 2mb down and 1mb up in southern tewksbury, I'm guessing my tower was upgraded, but S4GRU told me my area was TBD :). Hoping to see the 4G sign at the end of the month!

 

By the way, whats the name of the app that gives you information on thw tower your connected to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speeds in Boston are extremely variable. One site can be blazing fast, the next one over, extremely slow.

 

It's very strange.

 

WiMAX speeds are pretty good in Boston, but the coverage is swiss cheese.

 

Got .01 4g WiMax at Fenway, i'm guessing that could've been because so many people in one place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting 2mb down and 1mb up in southern tewksbury' date=' I'm guessing my tower was upgraded, but S4GRU told me my area was TBD :). Hoping to see the 4G sign at the end of the month!

 

By the way, whats the name of the app that gives you information on thw tower your connected to?

 

Correction...schedule info comes directly from Sprint. Sprint schedule database said TBD. TBD just means that the person doing the data entry didn't have info about the site at the time they were entering in the data.

 

We shouldn't read anything into a date marked TBD. It doesn't necessarily mean it's far out.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correction...schedule info comes directly from Sprint. Sprint schedule database said TBD. TBD just means that the person doing the data entry didn't have info about the site at the time they were entering in the data.

 

We shouldn't read anything into a date marked TBD. It doesn't necessarily mean it's far out.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

Thanks :)..... And do you know of the app name that tells you the tower # your connected to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Thanks :)..... And do you know of the app name that tells you the tower # your connected to?

 

There is no app that will provide you the actual Sprint Site ID numbers. But there are apps that will give you a BSID number for the sector you are on at a specific site. Apps like CDMA Field Test. However, it only works for the 1x carrier, not the EVDO carrier.

 

You can also get the same information from your Debug Menu, by entering ##DEBUG# in your phone dialer.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got live 4G LTE tonight in Tewksbury around 7pm!! I was on Route 38 and likely hitting the tower at the Wynn School on Griffin Way, which I know has been worked on. Signal was strong and LTE held steady until I left the area. Speeds were very good.. screenshots attached. Even if its only temporary (?), still a great sign!

 

-Mike

 

ad4cabd0-7170-d3f4.jpgad4cabd0-717d-152c.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Everything on eHRPD does the same thing - starts off bouncing over 2mbit, then just sort of jumps around and lands in the 1800 range or so. It wants to go faster, but it can't, heh.

 

Now that they have some headroom they're almost certainly bursting before throttling to sustained speeds. This accelerates many common use cases (email updates, html downloads, Google results) without choking capacity with large sustained downloads. Its super smart, giving a much better general user experience the majority of the time. Cable internet providers have been doing it for years.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...