Jump to content

Samsung SPH-L300- Interesting Rumor

MacinJosh

By MacinJosh
in Samsung

 Share

Recommended Posts

MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
Posted

Android Police has posted a pic that might match that last device on the Sprint roadmap from April. According to the article it has a Snapdragon S4.

 

http://www.androidpo...ii-but-has-ics/

 

Could this be fake, or maybe this is our next mystery device.

 

Android Police references this article as their source: http://briefmobile.c...-l300-leaks-out

 

BriefMobile_L300.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

I read that last night. Although I wont say it is impossible, I will say it hasn't been on the lab schedules. I'm not convinced yet.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
BenChase7 Member Level: 4G WiMax

BenChase7

Posted
Posted

I read that last night. Although I wont say it is impossible, I will say it hasn't been on the lab schedules. I'm not convinced yet.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

 

So that unidentified phone in Sprint's lab is definitely something other then this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
S4GRU Member Level: LTE Advanced

S4GRU

Posted
Posted

 

So that unidentified phone in Sprint's lab is definitely something other then this?

 

I think the device in the lab now is a flagship phone. I don't think this "thing" fits the bill.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
themuffinman Member Level: LTE Advanced

themuffinman

Posted
Posted

This phone is definitely not a flagship phone, not being 12mm thick and having 800*480 wvga resolution. But if it has s4 in it and a gig of ram then it could very well be the fastest phone on sprints line up since it has a lot less pixels to push, LOL.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
miguell2 Member Level: 3G EVDO

miguell2

Posted
Posted

This phone is definitely not a flagship phone, not being 12mm thick and having 800*480 wvga resolution. But if it has s4 in it and a gig of ram then it could very well be the fastest phone on sprints line up since it has a lot less pixels to push, LOL.

 

Could very well just be a leaked proof of concept prototype or a network test phone for NV...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
9erHater Member Level: iDEN *chirp*

9erHater

Posted
Posted

At 12mm thick, I'm guessing it's a qwerty device. It would still be slightly thinner than the original Epic 4G. Pretty close in specs and dimensions to the AT&T Samsung Captivate Glide, but with a S4.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
themuffinman Member Level: LTE Advanced

themuffinman

Posted
Posted

At 12mm thick, I'm guessing it's a qwerty device. It would still be slightly thinner than the original Epic 4G. Pretty close in specs and dimensions to the AT&T Samsung Captivate Glide, but with a S4.

 

I didn't even think of that, 12mm thick for a device with a hardware keyboard is pretty awesome, only if it had a higher resolution though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MacinJosh Member Level: LTE Advanced

MacinJosh

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I didn't even think of that, 12mm thick for a device with a hardware keyboard is pretty awesome, only if it had a higher resolution though.

 

Higher resolution would be nice. I haven't noticed the low resolution much on my Evo Shift, so it doesn't bother me too much. I sure noticed it against the E4GT though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
themuffinman Member Level: LTE Advanced

themuffinman

Posted
Posted

Higher resolution would be nice. I haven't noticed the low resolution much on my Evo Shift, so it doesn't bother me too much. I sure noticed it against the E4GT though.

 

Thats the thing though, you never really notice that sort of thing until you see something else with an even higher resolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Deval Member Level: LTE Advanced

Deval

Posted
Posted

Thats the thing though, you never really notice that sort of thing until you see something else with an even higher resolution.

 

I agree, just swapped my Epic Touch for the EVO 3D (I have both, just testing an ICS ROM for the 3VO), and I miss that higher res screen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Evening Shade  
    • radem
      Net Neutrality - take 2

      By radem · Posted

      I would like to see a technical explanation as to how 5G network slicing is supposed to work with Net Neutrality.  My read on this which may be incorrect is that network slicing would only be allowed under net neutrality so long as the slice of the network is a private network but that seems to contradict the ability for the general public to use a public facing app from the app store that will run over the network slice.
    • topdownat4
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By topdownat4 · Posted

      Shade Tree
    • S4GRU
      Keep a Word, Drop a Word #7

      By S4GRU · Posted

      Tea Tree  
    • dkyeager
      Wireless carrier FWA

      By dkyeager · Posted

      https://www.lightreading.com/fixed-wireless-access/t-mobile-verizon-disclose-fwa-usage-stats I disagree with this article.  AT&T and Verizon have many rural sites without C-Band (or mmWave),  which ultimately are use it or lose it for them due to licensing requirements.  T-Mobile's rural FWA will greatly benefit once Auction 108 licenses are finally awarded.  Thus much growth is left for FWA.  So far the carriers have been going after the low hanging fruit in the suburbs and exburbs.  In those places FWA may ultimately be forced out.  Perhaps by them BEAD money would be better put to use to bury fiber in suburban back yards (or next to the curb).  This assumes that FWA will result in more rural towers given better economics with wireless plus FWA revenue.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...