Jump to content

How is Network Vision progressing?


Recommended Posts

What is your guy's opinions on how NV is progressing? Is anyone seeing any material benefits yet? I know the most exciting part is the LTE deployment, but how about improved 3G speeds, lower dropped calls, getting signal where you weren't before, etc? Does anyone have any hard data on this matter -- pre/post NV deployment network performance? How would you guys rate the non-LTE benefits of NV?

 

I noticed from your maps that Los Angeles is undergoing a lot of NV deployments, but I have yet to see any material benefits -- mostly seeing pretty poor 3G speeds on the Epic Touch. In fact, I think I would argue that the speeds are lower than they were around this time last year, probably due to the increased # of users on the network. I'm just curious if they haven't flipped the switch yet, or if this is all there is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have experienced many problems in my house and certain parts of my town. Most these problems have been fixed with the temporary upgrades but can't wait till NV come through my town this Fall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure about this, but I know that many problems with towers that have already been upgraded is the lack of back haul. With the amount of microwave back haul being implemented, when the fiber optic back haul is late, it can affect up to 6-8 towers. Forcing Sprint to continue to use the legacy back haul and only 3G. It is difficult to accept when you expect to see vast improvement, but it won't be long until there is a premium network fully implemented.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know based on how the rollout has gone here in Chicago that 3g upgrades can happen without the backhaul upgrade being complete yet. The couple towers that I have encountered here that have had both the 3g and backhaul upgrades done I was seeing download speeds of 1+mbps and 500k upload speeds at 2:00 in the afternoon. The upgrades, when they finally happen, are worth it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know based on how the rollout has gone here in Chicago that 3g upgrades can happen without the backhaul upgrade being complete yet. The couple towers that I have encountered here that have had both the 3g and backhaul upgrades done I was seeing download speeds of 1+mbps and 500k upload speeds at 2:00 in the afternoon. The upgrades, when they finally happen, are worth it!

 

It depends on what was slowing down the network though. If it was in need of additional capacity, NV will make big improvements without back haul upgrades. If back haul was the problem, nothing will change until enhanced back haul is installed.

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still stuck at a whopping .2-.4 Mbps not much improvement here in jersey, but if I go east a bit from here it's pretty nice where the 3G towers have been upgraded. I get around 1 mbps man do I miss T-Mobile surprisingly enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is your guy's opinions on how NV is progressing? Is anyone seeing any material benefits yet? I know the most exciting part is the LTE deployment, but how about improved 3G speeds, lower dropped calls, getting signal where you weren't before, etc? Does anyone have any hard data on this matter -- pre/post NV deployment network performance? How would you guys rate the non-LTE benefits of NV?

 

I noticed from your maps that Los Angeles is undergoing a lot of NV deployments, but I have yet to see any material benefits -- mostly seeing pretty poor 3G speeds on the Epic Touch. In fact, I think I would argue that the speeds are lower than they were around this time last year, probably due to the increased # of users on the network. I'm just curious if they haven't flipped the switch yet, or if this is all there is.

 

They have only completed 36 sites out of 1,063 total LA Metro sites. That is only 3%. 97% more to go. Also, with such a high site density, that means most of these cells are very small. I would doubt you would notice much right now, unless you were standing right next to one of the completed NV sites. And we have a S4GRU member who is going around and checking some LA sites that are complete and has reported his findings, including upgraded speeds.

 

Network Vision is not a simple upgrade at each site. It is a major tear down and replace of every single piece of equipment, coax, internet backhaul, sweeps, cabinets, radios, panels...it replaces everything at every single site except for the tower/structure itself. It is going to take 10 months to complete a market the size of LA. And perhaps even longer.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert or someone else capable of answering this question, I have read awhile back ( can't remember where though) that with NV upgrade they were putting something closer to the receiver antenna that was normally on the ground with the main equipment. The logic was that it would minimize signal loss and actually improve signal strength quite a bit being up on the tower itself. Is this so and what was it exactly just to refresh my memory?

 

If this is the case then I can't wait for my towers in Charlotte, NC receive the NV upgrades. I am more concerned with Voice coverage more than anything at the house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert or someone else capable of answering this question, I have read awhile back ( can't remember where though) that with NV upgrade they were putting something closer to the receiver antenna that was normally on the ground with the main equipment. The logic was that it would minimize signal loss and actually improve signal strength quite a bit being up on the tower itself. Is this so and what was it exactly just to refresh my memory?

 

If this is the case then I can't wait for my towers in Charlotte, NC receive the NV upgrades. I am more concerned with Voice coverage more than anything at the house.

 

Remote Radio Units, or RRU's, is what was talked about many times here on this site.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert or someone else capable of answering this question, I have read awhile back ( can't remember where though) that with NV upgrade they were putting something closer to the receiver antenna that was normally on the ground with the main equipment. The logic was that it would minimize signal loss and actually improve signal strength quite a bit being up on the tower itself. Is this so and what was it exactly just to refresh my memory?

 

If this is the case then I can't wait for my towers in Charlotte, NC receive the NV upgrades. I am more concerned with Voice coverage more than anything at the house.

 

Yes, as Josh explains above, Sprint is moving to RRU's in Network Vision. Placing the radio directly behind the antenna. In field testing, the signal gain for doing this is approximately 20%. However, the gain is highly variable depending on the coax that was used at the legacy site and the length of the run. A newer site with a short coax, the gain could be as low as 3% to 5%. At an old boomer (with a 500' run), the gain could be 30% to 40%, possibly even more.

 

Robert

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still stuck at a whopping .2-.4 Mbps not much improvement here in jersey, but if I go east a bit from here it's pretty nice where the 3G towers have been upgraded. I get around 1 mbps man do I miss T-Mobile surprisingly enough.

 

They actually have completed a block of towers in Central Jersey with both NV and LTE, I believe...I'm going to do some drive testing this weekend if I get a chance. I just got my hands on an LG Viper to test with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report back should you find any sites live with LTE. Would love to update our maps accordingly. Thanks!

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Report back should you find any sites live with LTE. Would love to update our maps accordingly. Thanks!

 

Robert

 

Will do, if they are live...lol.

 

Otherwise I'll get kickass 3G speeds :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • The Kendall/Kerr/Gillespie PCS swap is a very nice win-win for AT&T and T-Mobile. Means both of them will have a 20x20 PCS channel, though in exchange T-Mobile goes from 10x10 to 5x5 on one of their spectrum blocks. I figure AT&T will start running n2 DSS on that channel, as they have enough customers in those areas to need the capacity, while T-Mobile will probably just run B2 LTE, as once Auction 108 finally clears they'll have plenty of n41 to play with. Guessing we'll see the non-G-block 5x5 slice running n25, but it would get aggregated with n71 rather than n41 I figure as n71 will remain 20x20 there until the STA goes away (and maybe after that, as if T-Mobile gets 700 MHz as the result of VZW buying West Central Wireless's spectrum there's no reason to run LTE in 600). Which makes me think that the next move is T-Mobile trading 700A for the 5x5 of orphaned PCS (E block) to VZW once the WCW transaction closes, as that would give VZW 20x20 PCS in the area, and would give T-Mobile 700 MHz in an area where they have none. Then VZW can either trade 700B to T-Mobile as well in exchange for the AWS I block in those areas (gives T-Mobile 10x10 B12, gives VZW 15x15 B66) or they can cut a deal with AT&T to give AT&T 10x10 B12 (AT&T has the lower C block), but I'm not sure what that deal would be if trading like for like (vs. AT&T handing VZW their upper tiny slice of B5, giving VZW 15x15 to play with in that band post-WCW-acquisition). EDIT: Just looked at AWS spectrum again, and if AT&T would rather have 10x10 B12 than 2x 10x10 AWS, they could swap AWS-D for VZW's 700B block. That would give VZW 20x20 AWS, and would take AT&T down to 10x10 + 5x5...which they'd likely be fine with as they have 20x20 PCS, small cells in the busy areas, and as a result of the transaction three 10x10 chunks of spectrum in the area below 1 GHz. And if VZW traded 700A to T-Mobile for PCS-E VZW would have 20x20 PCS as well. Which is quite useful in an area that's macro-only for VZW and likely not dense enough for proper mobile usage of CBRS or C-Band (and an area where VZW doesn't even run DSS now).
    • Yeah, $250 credit for an S22 is awful. tbf last year they didn't have solid upgrade credits until mid-late April, which is when I paid $225 to swap my S21 for an S22. Happy to wait 'til then for that kind of deal, though I'll be annoyed at battery life in the mean time.
    • Miserable upgrade credits from Samsung this year unless you want to rely on carrier financing. Sticking with S22U for a while. 
    • So far we've documented close to 100 Sprint conversions in NYC with permits still rolling in and that's only what we've identified manually. Tons of sites get converted/updated without permits so there's potentially a lot more that we haven't spotted yet. There are also dozens of sites that are still broadcasting the keep PLMN, some have been decommissioned but historically the vast majority have been converted.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...