Jump to content

Athens, GA LTE


danielholt

Recommended Posts

I'll still try while I'm down there, just in case by freak chance. Also, Sprint can still push PRL's to my Viper since that was the only way they fixed my 3G data this last week.

 

Right, they can change it, but you can't (at least currently).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although I have not received any inside information to back this up, I'm expecting there to be an OTA that comes out within the next few weeks. And when it does, Sprint will claim the OTA will open up the device to use LTE, and then they will stop unblocking the network.

 

Robert, I am quoting you back to you but is this the OTA info that you are referring to?:

 

"It is anticipated that Sprint will offer sometime in June the ability for the Galaxy Nexus to go into LTE Self Discovery mode, where the device will be able to search for a LTE signal on it is own, and turn LTE off itself automatically if it cannot connect to LTE 1900. This would be a pretty desirable setting. Keeping a LTE signal when at all possible, but minimizing the battery drain of just leaving the LTE on all the time. This will be particularly important during the phase while Sprint is in the process of adding service in your area. Self discovery mode is likely to be added via an OTA.

 

Another aspect of the Galaxy Nexus is that it fully supports eHRPD. This is the protocol established to allow 3G EVDO to seamlessly handoff to 4G LTE. Back and forth. This will be especially helpful in travelling in and out of LTE service while it is under deployment. The eHRPD will be a welcome improvement over the handoff failures that customers often complained about between 3G EVDO and 4G WiMax. Let's hope that Sprint's eHRPD is more successful than Verizon's. Which is often one of the culprits heard blamed for Verizon's LTE outages that keep occurring."

 

This is from your article:

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-117-confirmed-sprint-targeting-april-15th-for-galaxy-nexus-launch/

 

Thanks.

 

Mav. :cool:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Robert is referring to an OTA for the Evo 4G LTE; Sprint had apparently originally planned to delay the release to June 10 to fix an LTE connectivity issue on the Evo, but instead they decided (probably to beat the date when people who bought the original Evo would begin rolling off-contract) to go ahead with the now-infamous May 18 date.

 

LTE Self-Discovery may also be part of the Evo's OTA (and surely it will be coming at some point, as it is for the Galaxy Nexus), but that's not the real motivation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Robert is referring to an OTA for the Evo 4G LTE; Sprint had apparently originally planned to delay the release to June 10 to fix an LTE connectivity issue on the Evo' date=' but instead they decided (probably to beat the date when people who bought the original Evo would begin rolling off-contract) to go ahead with the now-infamous May 18 date.

 

LTE Self-Discovery may also be part of the Evo's OTA (and surely it will be coming at some point, as it is for the Galaxy Nexus), but that's not the real motivation.[/quote']

 

As usual, Chris is right on. I think the LTE Connectivity issue OTA fix may possibly come out stealthily with another OTA, like the LTE Self Discovery OTA. And I certainly don't expect Sprint to call it exactly what it is. Although, they may say the OTA allows it to connect to the LTE network, as if it was always planned that way.

 

Robert via Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they not stick with the original launch date in the first place? Yeah, launch a device that has customs issues and LTE issues, on a network that is not even close to be fully baked. Sorry to the EVO LTE owners but that sucks Sprint put you in that spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did they not stick with the original launch date in the first place? Yeah, launch a device that has customs issues and LTE issues, on a network that is not even close to be fully baked. Sorry to the EVO LTE owners but that sucks Sprint put you in that spot.

 

Retention of the OG Evo buyers I'd imagine was a big part of it. And the customs issues could have just as easily arisen with a delayed launch; customs is apparently holding up all of HTC's shipments to check every crate for compliance with the ITC order (which may be within their rights but my understanding is that multiweek delays for established importers are very uncommon, to say the least, especially after letting through earlier shipments of the same products), and I doubt they'll let up anytime soon.

 

By all accounts the Evo LTE is a great device and a good performer on 3G, 1x, and WiFi, and has the exact same access to LTE as everyone else on Sprint (i.e. none, officially). The LTE network isn't there yet, but it's not like the phone's useless without it. And whatever LTE connectivity issues there are with the Evo (it's not at all clear what they are) are likely to be fixed before most users ever experience them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

while I am extremely disappointed with the way sprint are selling LTE devices before the network is ready.... Verizon more or less did the same thing early last year... I believe initially verizon only had LTE deployed in a handful of markets, I believe NFL markets only..... however they were pushing LTE handsets (i.e. thunderbolt) everywhere with a nationwide LTE campaign on TV..

 

heres where the rub is, while verizon were guilty of this practice, they STILL had LTE deployed at the time the handsets were sold, LTE was up and running in the major NFL cities. Sprint has nothing, nada, ziltch. A test tower here and there, with no sense of a deployment date.... I seriously doubt they will turn the switch in June, I am not sure if its a sponsor only piece of data, so I won't quote it, but the actual amount of live LTE (but blocked) towers are miniscule. I am not trying to lead a mutiny against sprint, cause I am beating the drum for unlimited national LTE data, but this was all handled wrong. by the end of 2012 there will be only a handful of markets running, by 2013 theyll be converting to 800mhz LTE, rendering these current handsets not useless, but.... enough to make me go ... GAHHH why didnt I wait!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Retention of the OG Evo buyers I'd imagine was a big part of it. And the customs issues could have just as easily arisen with a delayed launch; customs is apparently holding up all of HTC's shipments to check every crate for compliance with the ITC order (which may be within their rights but my understanding is that multiweek delays for established importers are very uncommon, to say the least, especially after letting through earlier shipments of the same products), and I doubt they'll let up anytime soon.

 

By all accounts the Evo LTE is a great device and a good performer on 3G, 1x, and WiFi, and has the exact same access to LTE as everyone else on Sprint (i.e. none, officially). The LTE network isn't there yet, but it's not like the phone's useless without it. And whatever LTE connectivity issues there are with the Evo (it's not at all clear what they are) are likely to be fixed before most users ever experience them.

 

I didn't want to seem like I was just singling out Sprint. AT&T isn't saying a peep yet about the One X LTE/Wi-Fi issues it has, or their own customs issues. AT&T will soon issue the 1.85 update that should fix a lot of the issues. It just sucks users have to be the beta testers here. I don't find it surprising these issues are popping up with the S4, a chipset with loads of potential but still having bugs to work out. That is a big reason why I have not yet pulled the trigger on a One X yet. I unfortunately don't live in a town with much in the way of native Sprint coverage so that rules the EVO out for me.

Edited by Fraydog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

 

It might have something to do with the need to differentiate one's self from all the other manufacturers using the same platform. I do believe they need to slow down the torrent of handset releases to test each handset more thoroughly. This business of a handset/month has to stop to allow for more thorough testing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might have something to do with the need to differentiate one's self from all the other manufacturers using the same platform. I do believe they need to slow down the torrent of handset releases to test each handset more thoroughly. This business of a handset/month has to stop to allow for more thorough testing.

 

true, but people also don't want to wait a year+ for an iphone refresh either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the deal with shoddy Android phone quality and Android phones basically released as betas? The EVO 4g LTE purportedly has reboot, WIFI, 3G and bluetooth issues. Reminds me of the Nexus S, the Galaxy Nexus, the LG G2x, the Galaxy S II, the Motorola Photon, and the Droid X. Each of those phones had issues either with reboots, and/or wifi and cellular connectivity.

 

I wouldn't single out Android phones for this type of complaint. iPhones are released with bugs and issues that need fixes. iOS updates are released that then need to be patched because they broke something else. Windows phones have issues as well. With iPhone, you only have one manufacturer so the variety of complaints are limited and iPhone users seem to be much more tolerant of issues.

 

The phone buying public wants new devices released regularly and without delays but then can't understand why there are issues upon launch. We then want manufacturers to support our devices forever, while still keeping up with our rapid update and release demands. Oh and make sure each phone you release has every piece of new tech, even the stuff that's not fully developed yet. Make sure it all works perfectly when I get it. Oh yeah, and definitely make sure I don't have to pay more than $199.00 for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

true, but people also don't want to wait a year+ for an iphone refresh either.

 

If by people you mean phone geeks like you and I, yes you're right! Regular people don't care and they certainly don't open up new lines on their accts just to get the latest and greatest handset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really just post the same article in 2 threads... you missed Texas..

 

Sent from your Galaxy Nexus 6

 

 

Edit: ahhh crap I can edit... hey its good to be in the top 2 LTE markets tho

Edited by danielholt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you really just post the same article in 2 threads... you missed Texas..

 

Just keeping the locals informed.

Texas? Eww. Let 'em fend for themselves. ;)

 

Mav. VERY :cool:

 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Nexus 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...