Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

On 9/6/2020 at 8:39 PM, dkyeager said:

Just set SignalCheck Pro to display the ip address (plus turn off wifi) then touch the ip adress and SCP will tell you which wireless carrier is being used.

Dumb question Mine says "Sprint Chicago POP". This is from an LG V60 on B71 when selecting. Shouldn't that say T-Mobile?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 7.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And what will this all mean for S4GRU?  We are in a wait and see mode before we decide how to adapt.  Until then, we will be here every day with you all, plotting our wireless destiny. Robert

Alright.  There may not be a Sprint anymore, but the same rules apply.  Just incessant complaining about the old Sprint is getting old.  People will start checking out because it just will become a co

And this is the truth that many of us are going to learn.  T-Mobile is not perfect everywhere.  They have some markets where they have some real bad towers here and there.  And there are some entire m

Posted Images

8 minutes ago, stlman314 said:

Dumb question Mine says "Sprint Chicago POP". This is from an LG V60 on B71 when selecting. Shouldn't that say T-Mobile?

Which carrier is billing you and which carrier is providing your primary service?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, dkyeager said:

Which carrier is billing you and which carrier is providing your primary service?

Sprint still billing. But phone is always T-MOBILE. Upgraded from my V50 to V60

Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, stlman314 said:

Sprint still billing. But phone is always T-MOBILE. Upgraded from my V50 to V60

I would kick this back to iansltx.  It matches what I would expect until a market is converted to a greater degree.  Although we are hearing exceptions now, for roaming to T-Mobile (and back to Sprint if you need it) you need to be on Sprint.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, dkyeager said:

I would kick this back to iansltx.  It matches what I would expect until a market is converted to a greater degree.  Although we are hearing exceptions now, for roaming to T-Mobile (and back to Sprint if you need it) you need to be on Sprint.

So if I lose T-Mobile connection my phone will try and hit Sprint then his roam then no service continue this cycle until I toggle airplane mode or restart. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dkyeager said:

I would kick this back to iansltx.  It matches what I would expect until a market is converted to a greater degree.  Although we are hearing exceptions now, for roaming to T-Mobile (and back to Sprint if you need it) you need to be on Sprint.

Sprint-billed accounts, as a rule, tunnel through to Sprint's network before going out to the internet, no matter whose towers you're using...international (or domestic) roaming works the same way. T-Mobile's IP network handling Sprint ROAMAHOME devices (e.g. 5G phones) is being trialed.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

My native T-Mobile line can now roam on Sprint using the 311-490 PLMN here in Houston. So far, it depends on the device you're using. VoLTE and SMS seem to work fine over all three Sprint bands on my unlocked Pixel using my T-Mobile SIM. Oddly enough, roaming isn't working on my tmobile OnePlus device.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, greenbastard said:

My native T-Mobile line can now roam on Sprint using the 311-490 PLMN here in Houston. So far, it depends on the device you're using. VoLTE and SMS seem to work fine over all three Sprint bands on my unlocked Pixel using my T-Mobile SIM. Oddly enough, roaming isn't working on my tmobile OnePlus device.

Lots more of this being reported in the /r/tmobile Subreddit as well.  Still nothing here in Washington, DC when I try to force roam.  I'm going to try to stop by my office (with a Sprint DAS, but no T-Mobile) later to see if it's enabled there.

Dallas Area: 

 

Irvine, CA: 

Las Vegas, NV:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

central iowa here, i've been trying to force my phone to the sprint network every day for the past week and so far it won't let me on there. i have the oneplus 7t pro 5G phone. tried combinations of selecting the 311490 network as well as disabling all bands except sprints. nothing yet 😕 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, bmoses said:

central iowa here, i've been trying to force my phone to the sprint network every day for the past week and so far it won't let me on there. i have the oneplus 7t pro 5G phone. tried combinations of selecting the 311490 network as well as disabling all bands except sprints. nothing yet 😕 

I'm wondering if CA was accelerated due to the wildfires.  Better to have two networks at their disposal during this time of need.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, dewbertdc said:

I'm wondering if CA was accelerated due to the wildfires.  Better to have two networks at their disposal during this time of need.

I doubt T-Mobile would want to run into potential network integration issues during this time. VoLTE works when roaming on Sprint, but it isn't working flawlessly. Sometimes I get no VoLTE and I have to switch the preferred network type to get it working.

This seems more like a region by region rollout.

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

c3e09bb3882b8bbbb8f4bf6e31989b21.png

4afa8199dc941d097d95a6eb2b009d0e.png

33628972dfd9a2cac54ee622bafe1f50.png

 

Earlier today at the school in Gates, NY, I noticed my iPhone 11 Pro Max roaming on T-Mobile as it had full service. I then almost hit 200 Mbps download twice. The 1st Speedtest got me 188 followed by the 191. However, five minutes later it defaulted/fell back on Sprint and could barely get over 2 Mbps. I texted these to the math teacher I work with as he has T-Mobile and follows the merger progress on Reddit. To the best of my knowledge he has a Google Pixel 3 and this was the first time my iPhone had speeds similar to him. The fast speeds were short lived but it was exciting to know that the networks are coming together in the Greater Rochester area! [emoji100][emoji390][emoji1430]

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marketing fluff aside, there's a pretty good explainer video for MU-MIMO in this press release.

https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-achieves-mind-blowing-5g-speeds-with-mu-mimo

Quote

In tech terms, with 100 MHz of total 5G spectrum in the demonstration, T-Mobile was able to achieve an astonishing 50+ bps/Hz in spectral efficiency. That is much higher than the single digit efficiency typically experienced today. T-Mobile expects to begin deploying this technology next year as they continue the goal of building America’s best 5G network.

Sounds like we can expect 100MHz NR channels next year, after they consolidate/eliminate Sprint B41 LTE.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, dewbertdc said:

Marketing fluff aside, there's a pretty good explainer video for MU-MIMO in this press release.

https://www.t-mobile.com/news/network/t-mobile-achieves-mind-blowing-5g-speeds-with-mu-mimo

Sounds like we can expect 100MHz NR channels next year, after they consolidate/eliminate Sprint B41 LTE.

That's fine and dandy, but seeing so many N41 sites in Houston with only 200-300mbps total backhaul makes me frown. Not much point if T-Mobile isn't going to or is unable to supply the backhaul to support it. Every month I'm thinking more and more that backhaul is going to be biggest hurdle of the 5G race.

There are previous Sprint N41 sites that were able to pull 500mbps+ that T-Mobile is colocated on and now deploying the same N41 themselves topping out at 200mbps at 2AM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure how much of a rush T-Mobile is going to be in to turn off Band 41 LTE.  Quite frankly, they need the capacity for the Sprint customers right now, and my understanding is that the existing NR equipment only does 100 MHz of LTE and/or NR, meaning any remaining spectrum would be wasted if Band 41 LTE were turned off before that NR equipment is, itself, replaced.  I'm actually surprised they're running Band 41 LTE on T-Mobile in this area given that they could just run 100 MHz of NR and be done with it, but they must need the capacity on LTE for their own customers.

If Band 41 LTE is gone at this time next year, my guess is that they either seriously subsidized cheaper NR phones and have much better penetration with those devices than I would expect otherwise, or they've decided to punish LTE customers with poor performance until they upgrade--or leave for AT&T or Verizon.

- Trip

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Trip said:

I'm not sure how much of a rush T-Mobile is going to be in to turn off Band 41 LTE.  Quite frankly, they need the capacity for the Sprint customers right now, and my understanding is that the existing NR equipment only does 100 MHz of LTE and/or NR, meaning any remaining spectrum would be wasted if Band 41 LTE were turned off before that NR equipment is, itself, replaced.  I'm actually surprised they're running Band 41 LTE on T-Mobile in this area given that they could just run 100 MHz of NR and be done with it, but they must need the capacity on LTE for their own customers.

If Band 41 LTE is gone at this time next year, my guess is that they either seriously subsidized cheaper NR phones and have much better penetration with those devices than I would expect otherwise, or they've decided to punish LTE customers with poor performance until they upgrade--or leave for AT&T or Verizon.

- Trip

I don't see B41 LTE going away any time soon, either, but I also don't expect that we'll see 100MHz NR carriers everywhere soon either.

T-Mobile is famous for only deploying capacity where they need it - I can see them reserving 100MHz of their 2.5 for NR but only deploying the full carrier where they know there's demand, leaving the 40-60MHz carriers in place elsewhere.  They could use multiple panels to deliver LTE alongside it, or use the higher-capacity Ericsson AIR 6449 panels that are becoming available to deliver it all.

The breadth of their 2.5GHz spectrum holdings gives them a lot of flexibility, but they've got to clear the legacy Sprint stuff out first...

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, dewbertdc said:

T-Mobile is famous for only deploying capacity where they need it

You say this like it's a bad thing, but Shentel does it too and that's the best part of the Sprint network that I've experienced--and I'd argue that some of Sprint's problem has been that it doesn't do this.  Not prioritizing the deployment is how you end up with Band 41 on towers surrounded by corn fields and cow pastures in Fauquier County, but a Band 25 GMO serving multiple shopping centers in Alexandria. 

But to your other point, there's a ton of Sprint 8T8R and MMIMO gear they could recycle in the short term to cover the rest of the Band 41 spectrum; perhaps even just moving it from the Sprint rack to the T-Mobile rack.  Or they could just leave it operating in the current tower position until the T-Mobile gear is upgraded with newer n41 gear and then remove the legacy Band 41 gear at that time.

- Trip

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Trip said:

You say this like it's a bad thing, but Shentel does it too and that's the best part of the Sprint network that I've experienced--and I'd argue that some of Sprint's problem has been that it doesn't do this.  Not prioritizing the deployment is how you end up with Band 41 on towers surrounded by corn fields and cow pastures in Fauquier County, but a Band 25 GMO serving multiple shopping centers in Alexandria. 

But to your other point, there's a ton of Sprint 8T8R and MMIMO gear they could recycle in the short term to cover the rest of the Band 41 spectrum; perhaps even just moving it from the Sprint rack to the T-Mobile rack.  Or they could just leave it operating in the current tower position until the T-Mobile gear is upgraded with newer n41 gear and then remove the legacy Band 41 gear at that time.

- Trip

LOL - my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek, but it's both good and bad - T-Mobile certainly keeps costs low by doing this and passes those savings on to the consumer, however, I've noticed that in DC proper, they haven't been able to keep up with the explosive growth in some of our neighborhoods.

The NoMA and H Street NE areas blew up over the last couple of years, and until very recently T-Mobile has been spotty (especially indoors) and had poor data speeds even with a strong signal.  The Fort Totten area of NE DC is starting to have the same problems - meanwhile, my AT&T work phone and Sprint iPad are flying along here.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All-

Long time viewer who has not commented in some time. Was on Sprint for a decade but switched to T Mobile four years ago. 
 

Today during my break, I went to the break room as I usually do. I am often connected to WiFi and or Tmobile WiFi Calling. I noticed my cellular reception was showing 4 bars. To my astonishment I saw Sprint as the network provider. This is an unlocked iPhone so there are no old device issues. Reception is very very strong throughout the building I’m in. Thought I’d share!

1512923E-422B-4EA9-BD09-4B31F2DDADDD.jpeg

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, bar5rab said:

Hi All-

Long time viewer who has not commented in some time. Was on Sprint for a decade but switched to T Mobile four years ago. 
 

Today during my break, I went to the break room as I usually do. I am often connected to WiFi and or Tmobile WiFi Calling. I noticed my cellular reception was showing 4 bars. To my astonishment I saw Sprint as the network provider. This is an unlocked iPhone so there are no old device issues. Reception is very very strong throughout the building I’m in. Thought I’d share!

1512923E-422B-4EA9-BD09-4B31F2DDADDD.jpeg

Can you share your approximate location?

Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, JLevoLTE said:

Lmao riverside county is huge

That’s specific enough for me - was just curious if it had expanded outside of the states we already know about. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Another one: https://www.fiercewireless.com/financial/softbank-to-sell-majority-stake-brightstar  
    • Hmm, I'm betting this is why I keep getting a "ROAMING NOT ALLOWED" in the service menu when I try to force SA N71. I had an issue trying to activate both my S20+ and Tab S6 when I switched to T-Mobile in April. Long story short they fixed the issue by giving me new SIM cards for both at a local store. My current SIM does not say R15 on it, it just says TM9263.
    • Not sure how more of yous guys aren't having GPS problems, my wife's phone finally updated and immediately started to fail and her dot was wandering around on Google Maps...... but as an update, I heard from Samsung. They know about the GPS dropouts and failed locks. It's almost isolated only on T-mobile's software build. It's an issue with Qualcomm's 5G chip and the GPS component. It will be fixed in ~2 weeks in the next update.    I hope your data issues are fixed on the next update too. I always have these kinds of issues with my data dropping out or locking on to a shitty signal. It's just the cost of doing business with The New T-mobile I've learned. Going back in time 6 years when Sprint's network was unusable. 
    • FYI for anyone with a recent multi-line T-Mobile plan, they're offering another free line for life if you call in or chat via T-Force on Twitter/Facebook/iMessage. I now have five lines of Magenta Plus for $125, all taxes included.  (Three free lines, plus a $15 discount match from when I ported one number over from Verizon that had an corporate discount attached to it).  
    • IMO, T-Mobile is pretty conservative with backhaul for most of their sites. Not to the point where it’ll start causing congestion issues, but I haven’t seen peak speeds at quite the level as I have on other carriers. Likely something to do with them not being in the wireline business.  That said, I was testing during rush hour and the engineers may still be working on optimizing these sites. AFAIK LTE-LAA was turned on in the past couple of days (plus they're the first non-macro sites in the city that I, personally, have seen LTE-LAA deployed on) and it was running at super lower power. Additionally, these oDAS sites are pretty limited on antenna diversity. I’ll have to check again, but I believe B46 was running in SISO mode on some nodes.   It's really pretty interesting how different the approach is in every neighborhood. Where I predominantly map (135 to 155), small cell density is pretty staggering - by my count, 22 new nodes have been activated in the past year and a half. The small cell count in East Harlem (specifically 100-110) is equally impressive - I've mapped 10 new nodes in the area over the past 9 months. That said, other upgrades seem to hit Harlem more slowly. On the other hand, places that I first mapped 2-3 years ago (ie. the East Village and Crown Heights) still have next-to-no small cell roll-out. Here's hoping the roll-out begins to become a bit more ubiquitous over the next year or two. So much congestion and spotty service in areas that small cells are made for, but T-Mobile hasn’t built out as dense. Carroll Gardens, Cobble Hill, Brooklyn Heights, Downtown Brooklyn, DUMBO, Red Hook, and even Gowanus - just off the top of my head. Hell, I haven’t been able to run a speedtest at the Smith-9th St station for three years.  Posted on Reddit about this a couple weeks back. Not just happening in the city. I understand why split eNBs exist when site upgrades occur - there typically have to be alterations to the BTS to allow all bands to operate under a single eNB ID. Sometimes the BTS isn't upgraded at the same time as the antennas, which means that you're stuck with split eNBs for several months.  However, this seems like a conscious choice. Sites that were previously broadcasting over a single eNB now have split eNBs without any upgrade to the antennas. Would really like to know the purpose of this, myself.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...