Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

Can Charter and Comcast help Sprint accelerate band 41 deployment so Comcast’s Xfinity Mobile phones can have access to band 41 too?

 

If they can help Sprint densify their 2.5 spectrum, then it will be a great win for all of them. Also band 41 would be able to handle both Sprint users and Xfinity Mobile users. 

 

Just my opinion.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I don’t think the current administration will take kindly to any mergers within the same ecosystem. Especially if it will produce less new hires then cuts.

If the feds block ATT and TWMedia it will be a tough road for anyone.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully we come out with better roaming from this exploration, between T-Mobile and Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, IamMrFamous07 said:

Can Charter and Comcast help Sprint accelerate band 41 deployment so Comcast’s Xfinity Mobile phones can have access to band 41 too?

 

If they can help Sprint densify their 2.5 spectrum, then it will be a great win for all of them. Also band 41 would be able to handle both Sprint users and Xfinity Mobile users. 

 

Just my opinion.

I'm curious if Charter's deal being discussed with Sprint now still includes Comcast, or not. I really doubt the deal will happen with just Charter alone, and I also doubt Charter's involvement, unless together with Comcast, is going to help at all regarding band 41 deployment and densification.

Softbank is making a huge mistake if they think Charter is a better deal for Sprint than going with T-Mobile. I'm not bashing Sprint at all here by saying this, but regarding Softbank it seems like a huge blunder to reject DT's offer while expecting Charter to be a better deal, because why? Masa gets a bit more say supposedly with a Charter merger? If so, then Softbank isn't caring a bit about Sprint, but rather themselves and their own company in Japan.

This is just part of why I really dislike Softbank's involvement with Sprint and I fully believe Sprint would be better off with another company owning it, except for cable - unless its a combined Charter/ Comcast deal where there is a stronger chance for national cable coverage along with the possibility of a Verizon merger into it with Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be truly great to see Son just crap all over TMO

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Agreed. Would be nice to buy out the remaining portion of Sprint, take them private and pour some money into the network and help pay down the debt. #pipedream

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, derrph said:

 


Agreed. Would be nice to buy out the remaining portion of Sprint, take them private and pour some money into the network and help pay down the debt.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

If Son is serious about this and truly is going to finance Sprint, that would be great. I just don't believe he's going to after all these times he's been trying to get rid of Sprint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Arysyn said:

If Son is serious about this and truly is going to finance Sprint, that would be great. I just don't believe he's going to after all these times he's been trying to get rid of Sprint.

I feel like he has no choice now but to do this. The next upcoming months will be interesting. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Son is serious about this and truly is going to finance Sprint, that would be great. I just don't believe he's going to after all these times he's been trying to get rid of Sprint.


Except if he wanted to dump Sprint he would have today.

It seems none of us have a clue here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Except if he wanted to dump Sprint he would have today.

It seems none of us have a clue here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


Exactly or on Monday.

If this man is wanting more control it clearly shows that he sees something in Sprint and is I guess changing course instead of just unloading them onto someone. I still stand behind Sprint being a serious force and can easily leap past T-Mobile on network quality and give atleast AT&T a run for their money if executed right with the network.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, IamMrFamous07 said:

I feel like he has no choice now but to do this. The next upcoming months will be interesting. 

 

1 minute ago, Johnner1999 said:

 


Except if he wanted to dump Sprint he would have today.

It seems none of us have a clue here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Masa has tried selling Sprint many times, according to reports online, but he didn't get anywhere with that. Now he's had a chance to do so with T-Mobile, but from reports now it sure sounds like DT was perfectly willing and ready to approve a deal, but he's not happy with it because he wants some part of it. Really what is it going to be?

While I'm pretty much anti-Softbank at this point, I like many here were pretty excited about Softbank buying into Sprint a few years ago, which I certainly believed they were going to pour money into Sprint's densification and massively do so, along with spectrum deployment. After my very positive experience using Sprint in a band 41- rich environment, I fully believed that effort, along with the massive amount of band 41 spectrum, would make Sprint a very dominating, powerful force in wireless, of which I certainly was looking forward too.

Yet that hasn't happened. I really don't blame Sprint for it, never had, and I believe Sprint employees would love for this to happen, though sadly there has been the unfortunate monetary situation hindering Sprint's progress. Although I've been looking towards Softbank to do something about it, and they really haven't. Instead, they are busy trying to unload Sprint while spending millions and billions of dollars buying other companies, money that easily would have turned Sprint around and made it the awesome company it really can be.

Yet now Masa wants power after all this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fd9c995c5189b736cb2773fff60a8d8b.jpgdab0020acee8a10b16e33a32df63d76d.jpg

Marcelo came out and made a 10 part statement. All the typical things that Sprint has always said but these two points stuck out the most.

Maybe a sign of things to come.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2017 at 9:37 PM, S4GRU said:

Official word?  How can there be an official announcement that a deal is off when there has been no official announcement that a deal is on?  It's all rumor and speculation.

:rofl:

        Both Sprint and T-Mobile officially announced they are ending merger talks.   What? Really...  Yes!     :rofl:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

        Both Sprint and T-Mobile officially announced they are ending merger talks.   What? Really...  Yes!     :rofl:

It happened just as the news reports said it would, regarding the notion of official announcements being made.

Despite some confusion/misunderstanding between Robert and I in our posts briefly conversing about the announcement issue, I do agree with him about how it didn't make sense there would be official announcements about the deal being cancelled, particularly since there wasn't any official announcements from these companies regarding the deal being discussed in the first place. Indeed all the insider discussion was in the news, and of course tech blogs and forums, such as where people such as myself love to speculate about mergers and acquisitions.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a great news, I just never saw consumer benefit from this. Way too much network overlap and unnecessary network integration complexity.

Land grab is the name of the game to make densificafion happen at it's fastest possible clip.

Sprint still has a massive spectrum advantage considering it's the sweat spot between equipment size+capacity. 

While the others are toying with unlicensed frequency for a reason.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, bill875 said:

And Donald Trump is on his way to Japan this afternoon.  Any coincidence?  I think not :lol:.

Unless the Trump Organization plans on purchasing Sprint and turning Sprint yellow into Trump gold, along with promising to make Sprint great again by advertising Trump's name on everything Sprint sells, his image on every bit of Sprint signage, calling Sprint's unlimited.plan The Trump Gold Unlimited Plan, Sprint stores where there is a giant wall in front of where some yuge Russian mafia bodybuilder male stands guard requiring proof of U.S. citizenship to enter, and all the employees look sad, very sad, because they don't get paid very well and always fear getting fired by their "official" boss, Jared Kushner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, IamMrFamous07 said:

Can Charter and Comcast help Sprint accelerate band 41 deployment so Comcast’s Xfinity Mobile phones can have access to band 41 too?

 

If they can help Sprint densify their 2.5 spectrum, then it will be a great win for all of them. Also band 41 would be able to handle both Sprint users and Xfinity Mobile users. 

 

Just my opinion.

xfinity mobile runs off of verizon wireless...i have them...so they wouldnt have access to sprints network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, derrph said:

 

Marcelo came out and made a 10 part statement. All the typical things that Sprint has always said but these two points stuck out the most.

 

Maybe a sign of things to come.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

Remember those densification plans that leaked a couple months back? I think that's their plan now, at least I hope it is. I'm half tempted to open a free line just in case this starts coming to fruition.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Fury Gran Coupe (My First Car - What a Boat...)
    • Definite usage quirks in hunting down these sites with a rainbow sim in a s24 ultra. Fell into a hole yesterday so sent off to T-Mobile purgatory. Try my various techniques. No Dish. Get within binocular range of former Sprint colocation and can see Dish equipment. Try to manually set network and everybody but no Dish is listed.  Airplane mode, restart, turn on and off sim, still no Dish. Pull upto 200ft from site straight on with antenna.  Still no Dish. Get to manual network hunting again on phone, power off phone for two minutes. Finally see Dish in manual network selection and choose it. Great signal as expected. I still think the 15 minute rule might work but lack patience. (With Sprint years ago, while roaming on AT&T, the phone would check for Sprint about every fifteen minutes. So at highway speed you could get to about the third Sprint site before roaming would end). Using both cellmapper and signalcheck.net maps to hunt down these sites. Cellmapper response is almost immediate these days (was taking weeks many months ago).  Their idea of where a site can be is often many miles apart. Of course not the same dataset. Also different ideas as how to label a site, but sector details can match with enough data (mimo makes this hard with its many sectors). Dish was using county spacing in a flat suburban area, but is now denser in a hilly richer suburban area.  Likely density of customers makes no difference as a poorer urban area with likely more Dish customers still has country spacing of sites.
    • Mike if you need more Dish data, I have been hunting down sites in western Columbus.  So far just n70 and n71 reporting although I CA all three.
    • Good catch! I meant 115932/119932. Edited my original post I've noticed the same thing lately and have just assumed that they're skipping it now because they're finally able to deploy mmWave small cells.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...