Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

Im not sure the major ISPs are really 100% interested in building cellular networks.  I feel like they are more content as MVNOs, it suits their business model and bundling power.  They also won't want to build a network where they don't have landline service. They also have extensive coverage via their customer routers.

They have owned AWS, 700 and sold those off.  They now have some 600 and I feel they will just sell it off.  You aren't going to solve anything with just 5x5. Have we actually seen Comcast, Charter or the like deploy anything beyond test equipment? I think they might be more interested in unlicensed stuff and deploy those in areas with high data usage across cellular.  But I'd expect these to be more like hotspots and not real city coverage network buildouts.  More a long the lines of the millions of WiFi hotspots they already have.  Shoot, that's an idea, every modem they give a customer has an LAA LTE radio in it for 5GHz.

I think Comcast and the like who have 600MHz are just speculators like they have been before. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
[[Template forums/front/topics/activity is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Comcast is big and likes it that way!   I don't see them doing anything with anyone else but the biggest cellular companies (Ie, Verizon and AT&T).   Not a well liked company and I don't see things changing much.    

Comcast is part of the reason why I find it ridiculous that the Government is having such issues over approving Sprint/T Mobile.    They let (whole heatedly) Comcast merge and buy out competitors until it's as huge as it is... in many areas being the only cable/broadband player.   Now you're (US Gov) is worried suddenly about going from 4 to 3 wireless carriers?!   

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, red_dog007 said:

Im not sure the major ISPs are really 100% interested in building cellular networks.  I feel like they are more content as MVNOs, it suits their business model and bundling power.  They also won't want to build a network where they don't have landline service. They also have extensive coverage via their customer routers.

They have owned AWS, 700 and sold those off.  They now have some 600 and I feel they will just sell it off.  You aren't going to solve anything with just 5x5. Have we actually seen Comcast, Charter or the like deploy anything beyond test equipment? I think they might be more interested in unlicensed stuff and deploy those in areas with high data usage across cellular.  But I'd expect these to be more like hotspots and not real city coverage network buildouts.  More a long the lines of the millions of WiFi hotspots they already have.  Shoot, that's an idea, every modem they give a customer has an LAA LTE radio in it for 5GHz.

I think Comcast and the like who have 600MHz are just speculators like they have been before. 

You remember that the AWS spectrum was supposed to be for Sprint but Sprint dropped the ball. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
You remember that the AWS spectrum was supposed to be for Sprint but Sprint dropped the ball. 
How did Sprint do that? Or why?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, dro1984 said:

If only it had clowns and magicians and "magic"!  Would make it more fun.        This is more like bad acting from a really bad Soap Opera.   It is an uncharted, never seen before Government mess (Government trying to set up another business?!).   Let's hope it gets its oars in the water today!

Believe me this is a circus. And TMobile is the ringleader below the clowns below the ringleader. Whenever I hear about the merger I think and hear circus music.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are making us wait until the last second....   No announcement... no leaks...   Nothing!    Grrrr!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

How did Sprint do that? Or why?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Sprint was part of SpectrumCo that bought a 10x10Mhz chunk in the AWS-1 auction for $2B. That was for Sprint to deploy paying rent to SpectrumCo. But Sprint had financial problems and could not afford to deploy it so they withdrew from SpectrumCo. The spectrum was then sold to Verizon for $4B for a handsome little profit.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Sprint was part of SpectrumCo that bought a 10x10Mhz chunk in the AWS-1 auction for $2B. That was for Sprint to deploy paying rent to SpectrumCo. But Sprint had financial problems and could not afford to deploy it so they withdrew from SpectrumCo. The spectrum was then sold to Verizon for $4B for a handsome little profit.

They also didn't even have a say.  They had just a non-voting 5% stake.  This was also pre-LTE and was expected to possibly be used for CDMA. 

They problably felt like they weren't or couldn't get a fair deal.  A touch more than a year after dropping out of the SpectrumCo JV they got a majority stake in Clearwire and started selling WiMax service.

Edited by red_dog007
Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

They also didn't even have a say.  They had just a non-voting 5% stake.  This was also pre-LTE and was expected to possibly be used for CDMA. 

They problably felt like they weren't or couldn't get a fair deal.  A touch more than a year after dropping out of the SpectrumCo JV they got a majority stake in Clearwire and started selling WiMax service.

The cable cos have had a long and troubled history with Sprint. They seem that they want to work with Sprint but then they stop. I don't know who's at fault.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

DOJ cancelled press release
Tmo cancelled earnings call
Is dish getting cold feet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

More popcorn, anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:

DOJ cancelled press release
Tmo cancelled earnings call
Is dish getting cold feet


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Twitter post shows the results for Tmobile.

https://www.t-mobile.com/news/t-mobile-q2-2019-earnings

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s on behalf of the DOJ .. they are negotiating with the states


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


If that’s to be true. I just think it’s going to be delayed a little while longer. The merger is going to happen.
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites


If that’s to be true. I just think it’s going to be delayed a little while longer. The merger is going to happen.

The deal has been pending over a year. Supposedly doj wants to pick off 1 state. With doj backing the states supposedly don’t stand a chance.. something else is up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The deal has been pending over a year. Supposedly doj wants to pick off 1 state. With doj backing the states supposedly don’t stand a chance.. something else is up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



Good thing Sprint stayed the course with their network upgrades. They would be screwed majorly right now.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The news / business outlets are still saying the delay is due to the DOJ negotiating with the states over the merger.     Overall, this might be good to clear as much of the legalities up as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, tybo31316 said:

Good thing Sprint stayed the course with their network upgrades. They would be screwed majorly right now.

 

 

Imagine how much better off they would be if they put in 100% effort into their upgrades.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

Imagine how much better off they would be if they put in 100% effort into their upgrades.

They've actually done more upgrades and tower additions in Texas after the merger was announced. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, dro1984 said:

The news / business outlets are still saying the delay is due to the DOJ negotiating with the states over the merger.     Overall, this might be good to clear as much of the legalities up as possible.

The DoJ is just trying to flip a couple of states to walk away from the lawsuit. Their goal is to weaken it as much as possible.

I'd be very surprised if the DoJ can convince anti-Trump states like California and New York to walk away. Those AGs are fully locked into a political pissing match.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • lilotimz locked and unlocked this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...