Jump to content
Nextel49

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread

Recommended Posts

I do hope FCC is going to enforced the deadline and hand the spectrum to whoever really want to be a carrier. I doubts the current FCC will do that.
If the merger fails Sprint should be allowed to have it. Could use the added BW

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the merger fails Sprint should be allowed to have it. Could use the added BW

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Make dish use it

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tengen31 said:

If the merger fails Sprint should be allowed to have it. Could use the added BW

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Sprint have enough spectrum but not enough cash.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint have enough spectrum but not enough cash.
I don't agree. They could have used it in the past for LTE allowing more B41 for 5G

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint have enough spectrum but not enough cash.
They lack low band spectrum which is important when scaling up coverage.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, danlodish345 said:

They lack low band spectrum which is important when scaling up coverage.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

Dish doesn't have much low band, I believe. They do have some 600Mhz. But the bulk of their spectrum is in AWS and PCS H block as well as some satellite bands converted for terrestrial use

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They lack low band spectrum which is important when scaling up coverage.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Plus other spectrum would allow them to use more B41 on 5G and maybe another band to use on 5G

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dish doesn't have much low band, I believe. They do have some 600Mhz. But the bulk of their spectrum is in AWS and PCS H block as well as some satellite bands converted for terrestrial use
The AWS would have done them some good. If Sprint had vzws pocket book I think the would have gone in on the last two spectrum auctions

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dish doesn't have much low band, I believe. They do have some 600Mhz. But the bulk of their spectrum is in AWS and PCS H block as well as some satellite bands converted for terrestrial use
well either way that little bit of low band spectrum would give them a better position than what they have now. They really need some serious low-band spectrum in order to upscale coverage to even compete with T-Mobile. That little five-by-five slice of band 26 aka the 800 SMR band is not enough for long-term it's enough for voice coverage yes and maybe a small slice for Data but other than that they're going to need quite a bit.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Plus other spectrum would allow them to use more B41 on 5G and maybe another band to use on 5G

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

I still want to see them acquire some low-band spectrum. It would greatly benefit Sprint. But I also understand that takes cash.

 

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

If I'm not mistaken doesn't dish have spectrum Nationwide

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

If you read the article, the DOJ is negotiating with Charter, Comcast and I believe they tossed it over to Google too.   Dish was not offered because they are not believed to have the funds to establish a network.   I don't get this either as I'm sure many of you won't.  Seems the DOJ is way out of bounds with this info.    I would think they'd want Dish to start utilizing their spectrum also.   I don't know how much of this is real or rumor... time will tell.    I think this merger has been stretched to ridiculous levels - never seen before.    To offer this to Comcast is a slap in the face and offers special treatment to a company that is already a near Monopoly in the cable industry nationwide!   

Edited by dro1984

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If you read the article, the DOJ is negotiating with Charter, Comcast and I believe they tossed it over to Google too.   Dish was not offered because they are not believed to have the funds to establish a network.   I don't get this either as I'm sure many of you won't.  Seems the DOJ is way out of bounds with this info.    I would think they'd want Dish to start utilizing their spectrum also.   I don't know how much of this is real or rumor... time will tell.    I think this merger has been stretched to ridiculous levels - never seen before.    Too offer this to Comcast is a slap in the face and offers special treatment to a company that is already a near Monopoly in the cable industry nationwide!   
I'm well aware that they have a monopoly Nationwide. Plus they have a MN vo agreement with Verizon. In my opinion I'd like to see Sprint stand on its own. if they strategize in areas where their coverage is strong they can easily compete with T-Mobile on the urban level. But obviously that also takes cash.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint doesn't have the cash to do anything with additional spectrum on their own.   They can barely use what they have now let alone fix the backhaul issues.    

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint doesn't have the cash to do anything with additional spectrum on their own.   They can barely use what they have now let alone fix the backhaul issues.    
I do understand to that they have a considerable amount of debt. but with a bit more strategizing and not giving away free service they could hopefully make a positive cash flow.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint doesn't have the cash to do anything with additional spectrum on their own.   They can barely use what they have now let alone fix the backhaul issues.    

That's why If the DOJ fails the Merger then they should have to be on the hook to help Sprint out

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's why If the DOJ fails the Merger then they should have to be on the hook to help Sprint out 
Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 
 
 
I actually agree with that. TMobile should fork over cash and in my opinion some of that delicious band 71 spectrum to Sprint.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, danlodish345 said:

I actually agree with that. TMobile should fork over cash and in my opinion some of that delicious band 71 spectrum to Sprint.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
 

They'll never give up band 71. Not a chance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
They'll never give up band 71. Not a chance. 
Think there would be a better chance of PCS. If the Merger fails I wish they could then just share spectrum

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

Think there would be a better chance of PCS. If the Merger fails I wish they could then just share spectrum

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

I don't think they would do that either. They don't have enough spectrum as it is. But I think band 71 would be the last thing they would give up. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't think they would do that either. They don't have enough spectrum as it is. But I think band 71 would be the last thing they would give up. 
Oh you never know that could become one of the concessions for the merger. If the merger fails.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sprint-corp-m-a-t-mobile-amazon-com-e/exclusive-amazon-interested-in-buying-boost-from-t-mobile-sprint-sources-idUSKCN1T02OV?il=0

Amazon wants to buy boost and some spectrum. The irony is, they should have bought the whole company from the get-go.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sprint-corp-m-a-t-mobile-amazon-com-e/exclusive-amazon-interested-in-buying-boost-from-t-mobile-sprint-sources-idUSKCN1T02OV?il=0
Amazon wants to buy boots and some spectrum. The irony is, they should have bought the whole company from the get-go.
If the Merger fails they should buy Sprint

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, NYC126 said:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-sprint-corp-m-a-t-mobile-amazon-com-e/exclusive-amazon-interested-in-buying-boost-from-t-mobile-sprint-sources-idUSKCN1T02OV?il=0

Amazon wants to buy boots and some spectrum. The irony is, they should have bought the whole company from the get-go.

That'll be interesting. Who would they get spectrum from? 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the Merger fails they should buy Sprint

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk


Cheaper to buy boost and invest the money that you would buying sprint Into boost


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tyroned3222 said:


Cheaper to buy boost and invest the money that you would buying sprint Into boost


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No debt with Boost unlike Sprint

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • LTE or LTE B? would be good.  I personally prefer to know that it is unknown.  Thanks!
    • Shoot me a diagnostic if you can catch this again! Invalid signal levels should automatically be filtered out.   Yeah, B66 and B71 are natively reported wrong on many devices due to an Android bug. SignalCheck tries to catch these and report them as B66/B71, but it's tricky because in some instances the incorrect band is actually a possible valid result. I'm not aware of B7 showing up, if someone catches that please send a diagnostic.. it is likely B66/B71 being reported incorrectly but not getting caught.
    • The report you sent showed the app was displaying B2 and the icon at the time was also B2--I checked the graphics to make sure the B2 icon didn't actually say B71, LOL.. if it happens again send another report! I don't recall any recent reports of the notification icon falling out of sync with the app itself.
    • Your G4 is running Android 6.0, which does not report EARFCN info. SignalCheck is displaying it as band 41 because PLMN ID 311490 is leading it to believe that it is a former Clear site, so it defaults to B41 unless another band is identified another way. With 311490 now being used during the merger transition, it's throwing things off. Unfortunately the app isn't going to be able to know if it's a Clear site or a merger-related thing.. perhaps I'll just remove the default band for now, since newer devices will be able to figure it out anyway. These multiple PLMNs are going to be even more problematic than they were before, because they aren't being used the same way in every market.
    • Because just like any other network, they can't guarantee coverage everywhere.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...