Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, S4GRU said:

The more meaningful number will be how many will be forced to upgrade because their phone will not be given a VoLTE update at all.  It's possible they will not support even newer Sprint phones that are certainly VoLTE capable with little to no firmware changes.  They may require ALL Sprint customers to upgrade in order to use to new combined network.  That precedent has occurred in the past in other mergers.  We just have no idea at this point how far they will be willing to go back for Sprint customers with existing devices capable of running on what the new network architecture will be.  They may not go backward at all.  Only forward.  We'll see as we start to hear details instead of rumors.

That's a very good point. I've been on Sprint with an iPhone 6/6s/7 and soon an 8 (once my screen protectors arrive).... all of which support VoLTE.

As you said, Sprint has these numbers. I imagine there will be a set deadline for folks to get a new VoLTE-capable device if this goes through. Perhaps there will be "upgrade incentives".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bigsnake49 said:

VOLTE is not a hardware feature. It's a software or firmware update. Heck it just might be a carrier settings update. Between voice over WiFi and VoLTE with graceful handover over, CDMA and WCDMA will be forgotten really soon.

Eh, VoLTE is a hardware feature in that it requires FCC OET authorization.  If a handset has not been lab tested and authorized for VoLTE in the FCC OET, then it ain't getting VoLTE.  Bar none.

And if the CDMA1X 800 carrier were shut down prematurely because of a merger with pink poop, that would be a damn shame.  It would favor "No Service" over fallback reliability.  And rebanded SMR 800 MHz spectrum that practically is made for a band class 10 carrier would go to waste, not useful for anything else.

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not advocating shutting down 1x800 prematurely. But at some point VOLTE particularly on the 600, 700 and 800MHz will have to make up for it. LTE supports a 1.4MHz channel size so the spectrum won't go to waste. Now at some point or another I would like to see the whole 800Mhz bandplan get revisited.

Isn't the only reason that VOLTE get's tested by the FCC  the hearing aid compatibility? And once it passes, it is a simple software or settings upgrade?

 

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not advocating shutting down 1x800 prematurely. But at some point VOLTE particularly on the 600, 700 and 800MHz will have to make up for it. LTE supports a 1.4MHz channel size so the spectrum won't go to waste.
Isn't the only reason that VOLTE get's tested by the FCC  the hearing aid compatibility? And once it passes, it is a simple software or settings upgrade?
I hope this Merger doesn't happen. Rather see Sprint do something with Dish or even USCC. It looks like USCC even holds Nationwide licenses.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

I hope this Merger doesn't happen. Rather see Sprint do something with Dish or even USCC. It looks like USCC even holds Nationwide licenses.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
 

If Sprint was a financially healthy company and had its network ducks in a row, I would agree with you. But even then the Big 2 would always have a built in advantage. Their Capex would be spread over twice as many customers.

Edited by bigsnake49
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sprint was a financially healthy company and had its network duck in a row, I would agree with you. But even then the Big 2 would always have a built in advantage. Their Capex would be spread over twice as many customers.
http://bgr.com/2017/10/10/sprint-t-mobile-merger-regulators-donald-trump/

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a question for the hardware gurus in this group. Which RRHs and panels would need to be replaced because they don't have enough ports? How about antenna panels? Or will they just add the other company's RRHs and panels onto the rack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Well Softbank could then say, remember those 50,000 jobs that we promised? You can kiss those goodbye! BTW, T-Mobile is not failing. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Softbank could then say, remember those 50,000 jobs that we promised? You can kiss those goodbye! BTW, T-Mobile is not failing. 
Well Trump is. Well crazy. You are right. Neither is failing.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, cletus said:

Welp. Hope we all enjoy a defacto duopoly for the next 10-20 years.

Or T-mobile can keep on bleeding Sprint dry, siphoning off their customers. Failing an actual merger, I think that creating a company that will own and operate a merged network and leases spectrum from both companies will be the way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Or T-mobile can keep on bleeding Sprint dry, siphoning off their customers. Failing an actual merger, I think that creating a company that will own and operate a merged network and leases spectrum from both companies will be the way to go.

Again, It will only take them about a decade or two to get near AT&T and even if they chew up every Sprint customer (doubtful) they will still be millions of subs behind AT&T (the 2nd biggest). So then what? Instead of a Sprint-T-Mobile merger now, we wait 10+ years until we have 3 carriers except the lowest place carrier spent a A LOT more money, has a less competitive network spectrum wise, while the 4th place carrier (Sprint) probably ends up leasing/selling spectrum to the big two because no one else can afford it. Perfect.

This is the only way I can see T-Mobile growing to challenge the big two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Softbank could then say, remember those 50,000 jobs that we promised? You can kiss those goodbye! BTW, T-Mobile is not failing. 
I just found out this tweet is fake. The writer of the article made it up.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Not advocating shutting down 1x800 prematurely. But at some point VOLTE particularly on the 600, 700 and 800MHz will have to make up for it. LTE supports a 1.4MHz channel size so the spectrum won't go to waste.

Nobody wants the 1.4 MHz FDD carrier.  Nobody, not users, not operators.  On its own, the 1.4 MHz FDD carrier is too small bandwidth.  In carrier aggregation, it is a waste of a limited number of carriers.  No, 1.4 MHz FDD was a token, stopgap measure for 2010, not 2020.

34 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Isn't the only reason that VOLTE get's tested by the FCC  the hearing aid compatibility? And once it passes, it is a simple software or settings upgrade?

Too often, people erroneously seem to think that the FCC OET does RF testing.  Nope.  The FCC OET is a clearinghouse.  OEMs and certified labs do the RF testing.  Unless VoLTE testing already is in the bank but not submitted, additional rounds of RF testing are required.  And if OEMs -- on their own or at the behest of providers -- do not decide that going back and getting authorizations for older devices is worth the time and money, then those devices will not do VoLTE.

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

I just found out this tweet is fake.

Did you also just find out that the Tooth Fairy is not real and the Moon is not made of green cheese?

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did you also just find out that the Tooth Fairy is not real and the Moon is not made of green cheese? AJ

 

lol Smarty pants 

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, WiWavelength said:

Nobody wants the 1.4 MHz FDD carrier.  Nobody, not users, not operators.  On its own, the 1.4 MHz FDD carrier is too small bandwidth.  In carrier aggregation, it is a waste of a limited number of carriers.  No, 1.4 MHz FDD was a token, stopgap measure for 2010, not 2020.

Too often, people erroneously seem to think that the FCC OET does RF testing.  Nope.  The FCC OET is a clearinghouse.  OEMs and certified labs do the RF testing.  Unless VoLTE testing already is in the bank but not submitted, additional rounds of RF testing are required.  And if OEMs -- on their own or at the behest of providers -- do not decide that going back and getting authorizations for older devices is worth the time and money, then those devices will not do VoLTE.

AJ

I still don't understand why you would need to do RF testing for VOLTE unless it is for hearing aid compliance. There is nothing different about VOLTE unless you increase the power during transmission beyond limits. As long as you stay within the power envelope,  it will be like any other data stream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, WiWavelength said:

Did you also just find out that the Tooth Fairy is not real and the Moon is not made of green cheese?

AJ

Wait a minute, I thought the moon was made of Swiss cheese ;).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

I still don't understand why you would need to do RF testing for VOLTE unless it is for hearing aid compliance.

That is part of it.  VoLTE is a telephone voice service, just like the circuit switched voice that it supplements or replaces.  No amount of misunderstanding or hoping is going to change that telephone voice services rightly have to jump through regulatory hoops that data services do not.

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Smarty pants

Correct on the first count.  But, no, I am not wearing pants.

AJ

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, S4GRU said:

Yes.  And post merger there will be even more pressure to raise the pricing.  It might be the right thing for the eventual health of the market.  I'm not sure if I am prepared to discuss the merits of that currently.  However, pricing will be under reduced pressure to go up without a 4th carrier to pressure them.  Right or wrong, that's where we are headed.

Maybe. That argument doesn't take into account returns to scale. The industry is still relatively competitive and with the push to 5g, MIMO, IoT, the rising cost of handsets etc... Who knows what prices are going to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr.Nuke said:

Pretty much everybody.

Well, I would have expected AT&T to have raised prices after both Verizon and T-Mobile did, yet they did not. A combined T-Mobile/sprint would have the spectrum resources to offer unlimited data for a long time to come as well as being a home ISP. Price is going to depend of where profit maximizations occurs. Upward pressure in this formula would come from less competition but downward pressure is going to come from scale, synergies and spectrum resources being more highly concentrated.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Was able to install the March 1 Android security patch. Seems slightly more accurate with 5g ca band id, but can not swear by it. Updated google play system update through the software information screen to March 1. *#73# still works. Froze updates waiting on SCP update beta to fix n41 showing as n38.
    • Just installed it. Thanks for the info.  71 mb mar 1st date.
    • There's a permit for a new 47 story building at 205 Montague St in Downtown Brooklyn. The problem is that  T-Mobile eNB 48352 is on the building next door and this new building will block two out of 3 sectors of the site. For reference, the new building will be roughly as tall as 16 Court St which is right across the street. This site is the primary site covering Cadman Plaza so I wonder what the plan is. Will they just try to change sector placement, move to a different building, or will this just speed up the conversion of the Sprint site at 25 Monroe Place?
    • At least not recently.  I think I might have seen this a year ago.  Not Sure.
    • Did they previously hop between n38 and n41 in prior version of SCP, or have you always seen n41 displayed properly?
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...