Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts


Many analyst believe that is what’s happening behind closed doors


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What is?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tengen31 said:

States are also determined to ruin coverage. If Sprint has to go on their own they will only be in the cites which is frustrating outside of bigger cities. Plus Sprints lack of low band spectrum.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

Welcome to how the some governments think, if your in a state that is against this merger. Call your house rep and tell them that they need to approve this merger and it is actually good for the state.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Milan Milanovic has a very nice blog post about PCS contiguity between Sprint and T-Mobile and then total 600MHz spectrum between T-Mobile and Dish. 

One very interesting tidbit is that Dish has an option to purchase Sprint's 800Mhz holdings but if they refuse they have to pay substantial penalties. So it's not a foregone conclusion that it will be sold to Dish. If it does not get sold, T-Mobile has the option to auction it off or continue using it.

While there is a lot of contiguity between T-Mobile and Spint in the PCS band, there is also lot of opportunities/challenges in spectrum horse trading. There are quite a few markets in which Block G is stranded.

 

https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/new-t-mobile-spectrum-coverage/

Edited by bigsnake49
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Milan Milanovic has a very nice blog post about PCS contiguity between Sprint and T-Mobile and then total 600MHz spectrum between T-Mobile and Dish. 

One very interesting tidbit is that Dish has an option to purchase Sprint's 800Mhz holdings but if they refuse they have to pay substantial penalties. So it's not a foregone conclusion that it will be sold to Dish. If it does not get sold, T-Mobile has the option to auction it off or continue using it.

While there is a lot of contiguity between T-Mobile and Spint in the PCS band, there is also lot of opportunities/challenges in spectrum horse trading. There are quite a few markets in which Block G is stranded.

 

https://www.speedtest.net/insights/blog/new-t-mobile-spectrum-coverage/

Great article!!!   It says everything including the migration plans!   This is very great news for all of us!!   I am very excited to have this all cleared up.  Hopefully the court case is short and sweet. .. and get thrown out! 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great article!!!   It says everything including the migration plans!   This is very great news for all of us!!   I am very excited to have this all cleared up.  Hopefully the court case is short and sweet. .. and get thrown out! 
There are good amount of markets with the C block that Sprint has and some where TMO has. Some people think that TMO will not do C+G cause then you lose B2 in those areas and will require B25 but think they will tho. Omaha Nebraska is one for example TMO holds the 15x15 Block so G block gives them 20x20. However there B2 will still be there as Sprint B block can do both B25 and 2.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone written to their states Attorney Generals office to voice their approval of the merger and ask them to withdraw from the lawsuit?

I have, as Michigan is one of the 14 states involved in the lawsuit.    

I highly suggest if you want this to go through and you live in one of the suing states, to take a moment and google your states attorney generals office email and send a note!     

If you live in Michigan, you can use this address:

miag@michigan.gov

Edited by dro1984
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here in Louisville Sprint has PCS B block (15x15MHz), T-Mobile has E, F, and C3 which combined is also 15x15 MHz. Together it will be 30x30 contiguous plus G block on top of that. Plus T-Mobile has H and I blocks AWS 3 for a 10x10 channel, and dish has G block. If they share and combine together they could have a 15x15 AWS 3 carrier. Plus 10x10 AWS 1, 5x5 B12, and whatever 600 T-mobile has here. T-mobile has much better density here than Sprint, if they can get everything deployed on all sites rapidly they could blow away Verizon (90MHz with everything deployed here) and compete well against AT&T. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here in Louisville Sprint has PCS B block (15x15MHz), T-Mobile has E, F, and C3 which combined is also 15x15 MHz. Together it will be 30x30 contiguous plus G block on top of that. Plus T-Mobile has H and I blocks AWS 3 for a 10x10 channel, and dish has G block. If they share and combine together they could have a 15x15 AWS 3 carrier. Plus 10x10 AWS 1, 5x5 B12, and whatever 600 T-mobile has here. T-mobile has much better density here than Sprint, if they can get everything deployed on all sites rapidly they could blow away Verizon (90MHz with everything deployed here) and compete well against AT&T. 

15x15 for 600 mhz. Does Sprint currently have 10x10 there then? 23d855175c39578f002f0960ed1433a8.jpg 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So looking into it, combined Sprint T-Mobile will only have 66MHz of spectrum in my area. Grandparents area is even worse at 50MHz combined. Congestion is definitely going to get worse. 

Oh cause they don't have B41 there? It's 66 total or download? I'm counting 90 total just for TMO?.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. 66 for downlink. 66 for uplink. 
TMobiles total holdings is 90 between down and up link. Sprint would make it 130 total. 88cddb0a0c2ae1df5f0cdcfea4391440.jpg

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brad The Beast said:

Sorry. 66 for downlink. 66 for uplink. 

The following other factors must be considered: any leases of Dish 600MHz spectrum, Dish may choose not to own 800MHz in the area, T-Mobile has a two year extended option on 4MHz of 800MHz, 2.5 in the area will go up for auction soon for the first time in many decades, mmWave could help in denser areas.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2019 at 2:38 PM, bigsnake49 said:

Did they forget to count AWS3 or something?

Just in 700E, PCS-H, AWS3 A1/B1 (lacks full coverage missing 26 licenses), AWS4, 800MHz is 85MHz. My market should be two scales higher. 

Atlanta for example is in the 81-90MHz color scale but  has 115MHz.  40MHz AWS4, 10MHz PCS-H, 15MHz AWS3 A1/B1, 10MHz AWS3 G, 6MHz 700E, 20MHz 600 F/G, 14MHz 800.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'm confused by the potential congestion issues?   Seems like a lot of spectrum potentially available in Brad the Beast's area?   I don't think Verizon or AT&T has that much for the area... So is that a non-issue when all available spectrum is factored in?  

Edited by dro1984
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh now Oregon has signed on to block the Sprint/Tmobile merger!! 😞  I don't like the fact that the growing list of states opposed to the merger is now 15.  They really need to make Dish a viable competitor sooner and this state AGs need to be concerned with other matters than the Sprint/Tmobile merger.  The sooner the Sprint/Tmobile merger can be finalized, the sooner the benefits of the combined spectrum assets can be deployed to help all customers.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it mentioned somewhere that Dish will be employing a cloud based virtualized C-RAN (Centralized Radio Access Network) architecture, ala Rakuten in Japan which means no basestation equipment at macro sites, just RRHs. Will the new T-Mobile adopt the C-RAN standard? It seems to me that it has a lot of advantages vis a vis the traditional enodeB architecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5G still hasn’t officially launched in DC, despite Sprint saying it was coming here in the “coming weeks” when Chicago was announced as launched on July 11th. I wonder if the delay is related to the “approved” merger.

Until this merger is actually finalized/consummated, I’m concerned that Sprint will treat its Network with a “just enough to keep the lights on” mentality, not care about Rootmetrics rankings, etc. Of course, Sprint did this for a number of years under Marcelo when Capex was substantially reduced.

Last quarter’s Earnings Numbers (which are more fully explained here) were pretty terrible, especially with the Postpaid losses. I’m not sure why they’d be any better this quarter.

Post-announcement/pre-merger Sprint is definitely an awkward period.

Edited by RedSpark
Added more thoughts
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5G still hasn’t officially launched in DC, despite Sprint saying it was coming here in the “coming weeks” when Chicago was announced as launched on July 11th. I wonder if the delay is related to the “approved” merger.
Until this merger is actually finalized/consummated, I’m concerned that Sprint will treat its Network with a “just enough to keep the lights on” mentality, not care about Rootmetrics rankings, etc. Of course, Sprint did this for a number of years under Marcelo when Capex was substantially reduced.
Last quarter’s Earnings Numbers (which are more fully explained here) were pretty terrible, especially with the Postpaid losses. I’m not sure why they’d be any better this quarter.
Post-announcement/pre-merger Sprint is definitely an awkward period.
No, the delay is Nokia. Chicago is a Samsung market.
https://www.lightreading.com/mobile/5g/nokia-delays-sprints-5g-rollout/d/d-id/753450?

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

×
×
  • Create New...