Jump to content

Official Tmobile-Sprint merger discussion thread


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

If they do where do they do?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

They would be owned by somebody else but would still be Sprint/T-Mobile MVNOs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s seems John and team are ready to hand these concessions over to the FCC on a silver platter

Giving up boost/ pricing guarantee/ and a rural build out seem a very small price to pay to get this approved. Keep virgin and metro I guess they would consolidate virgin with metro into one. I just think it’s silly keeping boost as an mvno it’s like creating you’re own competition lol..

approval is set soon before the shot clock Expires

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-05-19/t-mobile-sprint-said-to-prepare-u-s-government-concessions

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


This deal is done imo.. now just waiting on the doj


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I wonder if we all get access to all towers after it's done. Sprint Customer's Tmobile towers with Volte and T-Mobile Customer's Sprint towers with Volte?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Legere’s Post and Pai’s Statement, here are the concessions Sprint/T-Mobile agreed to:

- Assurance of 97% U.S. population coverage within three years of the merger’s close, including of 85% of rural Americans.

- Assurance of 99% U.S. population coverage within six years of the merger’s close, including of 90% of rural Americans.

- Assurance that 90% of Americans will have mobile broadband access at 100Mbps or more, with 99% being able to access speeds of 50Mbps or more.

- Assurance that at least two-thirds of rural Americans will have access to high-speed, mid-band 5G.

- Assurance of divestiture of Boost Mobile to retain competitiveness in the prepaid wireless segment.

- Billions of dollars in penalties to the FCC if the merged “New T-Mobile” fails to follow through on these commitments.

We’ve all seen what a deterrent these penalties have been on Google and Facebook. They simply see it as UPS/Fedex sees parking tickets: just the cost of doing business. I don’t have much faith.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we all get access to all towers after it's done. Sprint Customer's Tmobile towers with Volte and T-Mobile Customer's Sprint towers with Volte?

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk


No, I think that would be a RF nightmare with sprint and tmo on the same towers and close by


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am very happy with this merger. Get'ir done! I want to see roaming on each other's networks immediately. Don't wait for the close of the deal.

I guess selling Boost was a good way to make sure that all or most of the Boost stores stay open which was a significant worry.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tyroned3222 said:


No, I think that would be a RF nightmare with sprint and tmo on the same towers and close by


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is part of what they talk about with 'network synergies'.  I am pretty sure that means co-location where possible, and currently duplicated tower/antenna groups being removed.

 

What I am curious to see is how this is done from a hardware standpoint.  Both carriers already run into congestion issues - but I dont know if that is congestion/constraints in regards to spectrum, RRU's, or other base station equipment.  They obviously cant just 'shut down' a sprint location and expect the TMO equipment to be able to reliably pick up everyone, nor can they do the opposite... and shut down a TMO location and expect the Sprint equipment to be able to reliably pick up everyone.  

 

I'm frankly excited to see this come to fruition.  I'm pessimistic about Legere in general, but for those of us in areas where coverage is good or better than average already... it will be exciting to see things ramp up (or possibly ramp down).  Will be interesting to see how this pans out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tyroned3222 said:


No, I think that would be a RF nightmare with sprint and tmo on the same towers and close by


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Huh? They don't have a problem right now, why would they have a problem going forward?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Huh? They don't have a problem right now, why would they have a problem going forward?
 

That’s in areas where sprint has no or little to no service.. if you turn this on everywhere to offset congestion and such it would be tough to do... i guess the small areas where sprint has coverage where tmo doesn’t it would work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaferz said:

That is part of what they talk about with 'network synergies'.  I am pretty sure that means co-location where possible, and currently duplicated tower/antenna groups being removed.

 

What I am curious to see is how this is done from a hardware standpoint.  Both carriers already run into congestion issues - but I dont know if that is congestion/constraints in regards to spectrum, RRU's, or other base station equipment.  They obviously cant just 'shut down' a sprint location and expect the TMO equipment to be able to reliably pick up everyone, nor can they do the opposite... and shut down a TMO location and expect the Sprint equipment to be able to reliably pick up everyone.  

 

I'm frankly excited to see this come to fruition.  I'm pessimistic about Legere in general, but for those of us in areas where coverage is good or better than average already... it will be exciting to see things ramp up (or possibly ramp down).  Will be interesting to see how this pans out!

Well, they already have identified which Sprint locations they will keep, only 10, 000. The rest are redundant. They will add another 10,000 new ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bigsnake49 said:

Well, they already have identified which Sprint locations they will keep, only 10, 000. The rest are redundant. They will add another 10,000 new ones.

That was early in the process.  They kept far more in the Metro PCS merger than planned.  I think it will depend on markets.  Sprint weak market sites will mostly be shut down IMO.  More successful Sprint markets will retain more sites.  Same with T-Mobile markets that are already over capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tyroned3222 said:


That’s in areas where sprint has no or little to no service.. if you turn this on everywhere to offset congestion and such it would be tough to do... i guess the small areas where sprint has coverage where tmo doesn’t it would work


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

They will start with everybody being able to roam on the other's network. It will be most advantageous to Sprint customers with newer phones that include band 66. T-mobile customers will be able to access Sprint's 19000 Mhz (no block G, unless they have the right phone). They will have to flood the market with phones that contain all the frequencies and incentivize people to buy them.

They have identified 10,000 Sprint sites that they will keep, the rest go away. It will be a logistical challenge to transfer the network equipment from one network to the other without local disruptions in service. But I have faith in T-Mobile's network team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was early in the process.  They kept far more in the Metro PCS merger than planned.  I think it will depend on markets.  Sprint weak market sites will mostly be shut down IMO.  More successful Sprint markets will retain more sites.  Same with T-Mobile markets that are already over capacity.

I really hope they keep the Sprint site on the roof off my work. Tmobile could use it as their is some dead spots here.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dkyeager said:

That was early in the process.  They kept far more in the Metro PCS merger than planned.  I think it will depend on markets.  Sprint weak market sites will mostly be shut down IMO.  More successful Sprint markets will retain more sites.  Same with T-Mobile markets that are already over capacity.

They kept all the Metro DAS because why not? They don't hurt anything. They just recently removed the Metro DAS from my local tower. It was kept there for almost 4 years after the merger. I wonder if they add a full site there again. It is a good location that will give them the same coverage as AT&T and Verizon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect a lot of spectrum swapping to get contiguous spectrum on band 2/25. 
Tmobile and Sprint have already been going thru that with each other. An far as with att or VZW I think there's done for.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tengen31 said:

Tmobile and Sprint have already been going thru that with each other. An far as with att or VZW I think there's done for.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

The question is what will New T-Mobile have to pay (in cash or spectrum).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tengen31 said:

Tmobile and Sprint have already been going thru that with each other. An far as with att or VZW I think there's done for.

Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
 

Well there's a lot of spectrum swapping to be done in the AWS-1/AWS-3 bands. Some of it will bleed over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...