Jump to content

Virgin and Boost prepaid may get 4G love with Wimax?????


ericdabbs

Recommended Posts

Probably not. The only Wimax phone not sold by either brand is the Moto Photon(?). All new Sprint phones are LTE and no longer support wimax. So what they have now is probably it until Sprint lets them start selling LTE devices.

 

Yeah, I had a feeling that would happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um the sgs2 people its wimax and i think boost or virgin selling it now

 

Sent from my white Epic 4g Touch

 

He asked if we thought if there would be any new WiMax devices. The SGS2 is already sold on Virgin.

 

Robert via CM9 Kindle Fire using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

I have been with Boost Mobile since their inception and had a Motorola Krzr. I was so glad when Sprint decided to give 4G WIMAX to Boost! Yes, the coverage has swiss cheese holes, but where coverage is good, it is good. I actually went out and bought the Evo Design 4G last May because my LG Lotus was painfully slow on 3G and the browser was horrible. I was dying to get a better phone and add getting WIMAX sealed the deal. I probably would still be using the Lotus if it wasn't for WIMAX. I will be using this phone until it defects/breaks or until WIMAX is turned off.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been with Boost Mobile since their inception and had a Motorola Krzr. I was so glad when Sprint decided to give 4G WIMAX to Boost! Yes, the coverage has swiss cheese holes, but where coverage is good, it is good. I actually went out and bought the Evo Design 4G last May because my LG Lotus was painfully slow on 3G and the browser was horrible. I was dying to get a better phone and add getting WIMAX sealed the deal. I probably would still be using the Lotus if it wasn't for WIMAX. I will be using this phone until it defects/breaks or until WIMAX is turned off.

 

Well if u like that u gonna love lte then boost just got that also.

 

Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus rockin 4.2.2 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking at the Boost mobile website a couple weeks ago(not switching, looking for a friend of mine down in Tennessee) and seen that they already have 2 phones out that have LTE capabilities, the phones are the HTC One SV(299.99) and the Boost Force(199.99). Not to bad pricing on the phones, if someone can afford them.

 

http://www.boostmobile.com/shop/phones/#/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well if u like that u gonna love lte then boost just got that also.

 

Sent from my Sprint Galaxy Nexus rockin 4.2.2 using Tapatalk 2

 

Wow, good to know. I'm going to their website right after this post. We don't fully have LTE in Plantation, yet. I've heard that the I 95 corridor is getting lit up in the Ft Lauderdale area. However, I am going to wait for WIMAX to get shut down and will buy an LTE phone, which should have full coverage on BOOST by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Reviving this thread: Update

 

I have been officially decomissioned off WIMAX. WIMAX seemed to be getting faster every day. The HTC phone defected and I splurged and spent last month's bonus on a Galaxy SIII on 4 G LTE. I have extensively tested the LTE coverage and speeds all throughout the SEFL Tri county area and the SWFL area (LEE & Collier Counties) and must give Softbank credit. They really are positioning Sprint to be a relevant competitor with the big ones.

 

WIMAX's main shortfall is that it does not go too far, which is why there are so many swiss cheese coverage holes. WIMAX is just a bunch of really powerful WIFI hot spots running on a spectrum named Legacy 4G. My subdivision is in a swiss cheese hole in between two WIMAX towers, but we get LTE fine. I only have issues getting LTE on the first story of the house.

Edited by SpecialEdVTEC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WIMAX's main shortfall is that it does not go too far, which is why there are so many swiss cheese coverage holes. WIMAX is just a bunch of really powerful WIFI hot spots running on a spectrum named Legacy 4G.

 

Nope.  The same is true of TD-LTE.  Just like WiMAX, it is very much akin to powerful Wi-Fi.  Your problem is that you are comparing a poor performing, outdated device to a much better performing, much newer device.  Had WiMAX gained sufficient traction to be included in today's devices, the positive difference would be night and day.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.  The same is true of TD-LTE.  Just like WiMAX, it is very much akin to powerful Wi-Fi.  Your problem is that you are comparing a poor performing, outdated device to a much better performing, much newer device.  Had WiMAX gained sufficient traction to be included in today's devices, the positive difference would be night and day.

 

AJ

Yup, Tis probably true. I wish WiMAX had more wins worldwide so that it would give the 3GPP competition but i think that boat has sailed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope.  The same is true of TD-LTE.  Just like WiMAX, it is very much akin to powerful Wi-Fi.  Your problem is that you are comparing a poor performing, outdated device to a much better performing, much newer device.  Had WiMAX gained sufficient traction to be included in today's devices, the positive difference would be night and day.

 

AJ

Or maybe they configured the LTE antennas on the towers in my neighborhood's vicinity to better serve my neighborhood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Or maybe they configured the LTE antennas on the towers in my neighborhood's vicinity to better serve my neighborhood. 

Nor are you taking into account the fact that the only substantial wimax provider in the United States at the time (and maybe even the world?  I don't know) was broadcasting at 2.5 ghz.  Signals at that frequency do not propagate very well (distance wise) nor through many structures.  That was, of course, related to Clear's spectrum holdings at the time.  

 

But, yeah,  as people migrated off wimax to LTE devices, more bandwidth was freed up, allowing for faster DL speeds.  Several of us here in Atlanta noticed that as well. 

 

Once all 3 bands are fully deployed with "Spark,"  I'm sure you'll be even more impressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Well.. my power flickered this evening and kicked my cell spot offline. I noticed that my phone still had service, then the 5G UC showed up on my screen. Honestly thought it was just a hang up from the loss and it was not displaying properly... but then I did a speed test and got 250meg down and 30 Meg upload.... apparently they've added n71 here in the past week and I just found it.  For the first time in 10+ years I don't need a box to give my service at home!! Like a kid with a new toy now...yay!  
    • Sounds like a "well you might as well just buy the company" statement
    • Bloosurf is petitioning to deny T-Mobile's request for an STA specifically in their service area. https://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsEntry/attachments/attachmentViewRD.jsp;ATTACHMENTS=Ghl9knTSFp8J4nVm1P9qL4541XR1gy58whH7Yyz0MwGs037gQrNV!-2042069078!-79842837?applType=search&fileKey=1297203795&attachmentKey=21718533&attachmentInd=applAttach Short read but pretty much they're saying that T-Mobile's operations in the BRS/EBS band has been interfering with Bloosurf's LTE-based WISP network and that this has caused them harm (lose customers, etc.) They claim that allowing T-Mobile access to all of the spectrum they bought in or near Bloosurf's service area would cause even more interference. To be fair they aren't wrong. They mention that in 2021 the FCC investigated and determined that T-Mobile was operating outside of its licensed spectrum band there. However, I get the sense that Bloosurf is just trying to stop a competitor from operating in their service area. Typically carriers work this kind of stuff out among each other. Here in NYC, 3/4ths of Brooklyn has 140MHz of n41 deployed and the southern 1/4th of it has 80MHz deployed thanks to an incumbent that leases the spectrum from the archdiocese. In spite of that there are no complaints of interference from NextWave in such a dense environment. Seems to me like Bloosurf just doesn't want to coordinate with T-Mobile and would rather complain to delay the deployment of spectrum for as long as possible. EDIT: It's not just their service area, it's a larger area surrounding their service area as well. Something's fishy about this request. 
    • Really cool blog post from OpenSignal giving a broad overview over the mobile network experience in NYC.  https://www.opensignal.com/2023/03/30/localized-analysis-reveals-huge-network-experience-gaps-between-mobile-users-in-the-us
    • Bit too early to tell imo. It's good news if Dish can stop the hemorrhaging. Q3/Q4 2022 they were able to stop the hemorrhaging. Their previous 6 quarters they lost between 160k and 350k subs each. Their next report will be interesting to see how they were impacted subscriber wise due to the hack.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...