Jump to content
Brad The Beast

EUTRA Neighbor Info

Recommended Posts

Can someone translate this for me. I see FDD band 41 neighbors in my EUTRA neighbors but I thought band 41 was TDD. Can anyone explain what this means?

EE986F65-0A96-4DE0-A5B5-978836DA1359.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

Can someone translate this for me. I see FDD band 41 neighbors in my EUTRA neighbors but I thought band 41 was TDD. Can anyone explain what this means?

EE986F65-0A96-4DE0-A5B5-978836DA1359.png

It's likely Field Test just being buggy as usual. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, RAvirani said:

It's likely Field Test just being buggy as usual. 

So what is a EUTRA neighbor?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Brad The Beast said:

So what is a EUTRA neighbor?

E-UTRA stands for Evolved UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access. It is just the LTE air interface. 

An E-UTRA neighbor is just a neighbor LTE cell/sector that your phone is measuring (possibly for cell reselection). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Incorrectly reported I guess.  earfcn of 40978 is TDD. Though FDD could be possible if you are nearer to Canada as they use Band 7 (FDD) and Band 38 (TDD) for 2.5/2.6GHz. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, red_dog007 said:

Incorrectly reported I guess.  earfcn of 40978 is TDD. Though FDD could be possible if you are nearer to Canada as they use Band 7 (FDD) and Band 38 (TDD) for 2.5/2.6GHz. 

Yes, I've seen Band 7 bear the Canadian border. EARFCNs are between 2750 and 3450. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So what does this mean then? Sprint doesn't own any band 41 licenses here but I'm seeing band 41 E-UTRA neighbors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand, E-UTRA neighbors are other bands on the cell site.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • So I figured out there is a way to check if a phone is using Calling+ or VoLTE without root. If engineering (not SCP) reports the PLMN as 310120, then it is not VoLTE. VoLTE only runs on 312530. That being said, a phone can be on 312530 but not use VoLTE (Pixel 2 for example). So being on 312530 is not sufficient to say that it is using VoLTE, but being on 310120 IS sufficient to rule out VoLTE being used. As for the "flag" Sprint uses to enable/disable it on supported devices, I suspect that they use the TAC. I think there is a hardcoded whitelist of TACs where it will be enabled. So they can change the TACs for a market to "enable" it, but by default it's "disabled". If this is the case, then Magic Box TACs are simply not whitelisted yet, even though it works fine on them. I've verified that VoLTE works on a Magic Box with at least the 440a firmware, and possibly earlier versions as well. Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk
    • You're referring to this: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/04/lawsuit-atts-directv-now-is-a-flop-and-att-lied-to-investors-about-it/ That's not beyond the realm of possibility for Sprint... especially given how any lawsuit would occur subsequent to the alleged "lying". Sprint's FCC Filing is supported by empirical and highly confidential data on its adds/losses, churn, etc. throughout the report. I believe it shows a serious situation. Even more so, Sprint says in the Filing that its investor statements noting certain accomplishments shouldn't detract from the seriousness of its current predicament. See Pages 36-42 of the FCC Filing, which includes this: "The recent improvements in some financial metrics simply cannot, and do not, overcome these fundamental challenges:" On balance, I'm more willing to believe the information in the FCC Filing which specifically references and dismisses the investor statements than in the investor statements alone. If the redacted "highly confidential" information in the Filing was made available to investors, I believe Sprint stock would be substantially impacted... as that information reflects the ground truth of what's happening with Sprint.
    • Then I hope whoever gets Sprint buys Dishes spectrum hell even uscc or New TMO Sent from my SM-G965U1 using Tapatalk
    • Dish does not have any money.They spent it all on spectrum.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...