Jump to content

Android Phone with Best Reception?


ScipioUSA

Recommended Posts

Hello All.

I've been with Sprint a long time, and have been relatively happy with their service.  But I live in a rural area, and lately my work has had me traveling a lot.   I recently started using an Essential PH-1, which has a great feel and the fast updates are great.  But Im not sure if I am going to be able to live with the very poor signal that it can pull in.  I'm honestly not as concerned with the data speeds as much as just being able to make a voice call.

 

Does anyone have a thought/recommendation on a phone that gets better reception?  I would prefer to stick with Android just because I am in their ecosystem, if possible.  Not looking to buy a 2019 flagship, but just wondering what that is current or from the past few years might work a little more reliably....

 

Thanks in advance!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ScipioUSA said:

Thanks for the response. Ill take a look.  Any other thoughts on something that might be one iteration behind?  Hoping to stay sub-$500

I am considering buying one on Swappa.  Much cheaper and you should get a barely used phone.  Paying $1000 for a new phone does not turn me on either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, chamb said:

I am considering buying one on Swappa.  Much cheaper and you should get a barely used phone.  Paying $1000 for a new phone does not turn me on either.

Thanks!  

 

I have used Swappa in the past and had good luck with it, as well as some of the more trusted sellers on eBay for NIB phones.  I really dig my Essential, but it has to work as a phone first and foremost.  Not sure if Sprint has been working on any tower upgrades in my area lately, but it seems the past month that service has been spottier than I was used to, and this new handset has just further compounded things.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe the Moto Z2 Force has excellent RF performance. It's also pretty cheap (well under $300 new or like new), has a Snapdragon 835 (like the Essential), near-stock Android (will be updated to Pie), and excellent battery life. I believe it also supports HPUE and Massive MIMO, and will also support wifi calling. Hopefully at some point it will support VoLTE.

The one downside to the Z2 Force is the shatterproof screen. It's got a plastic top layer that is prone to scratches. Motorola will replace it for you, but I'd suggest getting a tempered-glass screen protector as soon as you get it. The tempered glass feels much better than the plastic and will protect the plastic from scratching, while maintaining the shatterproof glass. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2018 at 4:25 PM, Shade00 said:

I believe the Moto Z2 Force has excellent RF performance. It's also pretty cheap (well under $300 new or like new), has a Snapdragon 835 (like the Essential), near-stock Android (will be updated to Pie), and excellent battery life. I believe it also supports HPUE and Massive MIMO, and will also support wifi calling. Hopefully at some point it will support VoLTE.

The one downside to the Z2 Force is the shatterproof screen. It's got a plastic top layer that is prone to scratches. Motorola will replace it for you, but I'd suggest getting a tempered-glass screen protector as soon as you get it. The tempered glass feels much better than the plastic and will protect the plastic from scratching, while maintaining the shatterproof glass. 

This👆

     I had an Essential and am much happier with my Z² force.  Can attest to the screen issue.  I had problems getting a protector at first and ended up with a few minor scratches despite hardly using it.  My only other complaint is that it's too big, but it was in my price range after Sprint dropped the price significantly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses, and I was hoping someone would say the Moto was a good performer.  I actually had tried to get some of them when Sprint/BB was closing them out super cheap, but they went before I could get there.  I was thinking of trying to nab one for my wife to use, as her old LG G5 is getting tired and the GPS is shot. 

I usually always try to put the tempered glass protectors on when I can, but it sounds like thats a big necessity for the Moto phones. 

I really like the feel of the Essential, but Im thinking I may need to part ways with it given where I spend most of my time.  The fact that the latest update seems to have interfered with the WiFi calling feature may have just sealed its fate...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the scratch issue is mainly related specifically to the Z² Force.  There's some thin protective layer on top which I've not seen on other phones.  That's what gets marked up easily.  Their Moto E line is their budget jobs.  I have an E² which also has excellent RF performance on all 3 LTE bands  That's what attracted me to the Motorola phones.  The Force has slightly worse performance on B26 than the E² and Nexus 5X.  B25 and 41 reception is just as good as the E² and noticeably better than the 5X on B41.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I havent looked into the E line, would probably go with one of the G series phones to stay on the cheap without a good deal.  

Im going to check into the Z2 Force, although Im also wondering what might crop up next week for the Black Friday/Cyber Monday deal.  I would consider one of the Moto X4 devices on the Android One platform, but I know that hardware is getting to be a little long in the tooth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take a look at the G7 ThinQ. I've heard that recent LG phones (V30 and newer) have some very impressive RF performance, and the G7 is a 6 month old phone going for under $400 on Swappa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jakeuten said:

Take a look at the G7 ThinQ. I've heard that recent LG phones (V30 and newer) have some very impressive RF performance, and the G7 is a 6 month old phone going for under $400 on Swappa.

I've been happy with my G7 so far.  Solid.

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So managed to find a Moto Z2 Force to try out, and the results are pretty substantial sitting at my desk.  The Moto is better pulling LTE by 3 dbm, and the 1x (which I believe is what I want for just making a voice call, right?) was better by 16 or 20 dbm. 

Might have me shopping soon...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I second the LG V30+.

I've had mine for over a year now, and I'm very pleased with the RF performance. I too live in a somewhat rural area, and also travel quite a bit, and I haven't been disappointed at all. RF performance is high on my list of must-haves when shopping for a new phone.

The V30+ also makes use of all the current network technologies offered by Sprint, as far as I know. I haven't been able to test out VoLTE yet (not live in my home area), but it's on the compatibility list.

I haven't been shopping, but I have seen the V30+ offered at very good prices recently.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My two previous devices were LG, and I was a little disappointed in the lack of timely updates.  That said, I would go for a V30 or G7 for the right price.  Coming off a G5 that had issues with screen burn, lack of genuine replacement batteries, and a faulty GPS has me needing it to be a really good deal.

 

I really like everything about the Essential excpet that it doesn't actually like to work as a phone...  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Took advantage of the 15% off coupon on eBay and got a Moto Z2 Force for around $200.  Still getting it transferred over (wouldnt find my Google Drive backups for some reason), but seeing much better signal at my office.  Pulling in multiple neighbor cells that I couldnt "see" before, and seeing probably 10 or more dBm improvement for the 1x.  Phone calls work all over the building now.  

 

Thanks very much for the recommendation!  Its a huge help.

 

Ill probably be listing my Essential for sale shortly, which makes me sad because I really liked the size and feel of that device.  But a phone should be a phone first.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/9/2018 at 7:40 AM, ScipioUSA said:

Hello All.

I've been with Sprint a long time, and have been relatively happy with their service.  But I live in a rural area, and lately my work has had me traveling a lot.   I recently started using an Essential PH-1, which has a great feel and the fast updates are great.  But Im not sure if I am going to be able to live with the very poor signal that it can pull in.  I'm honestly not as concerned with the data speeds as much as just being able to make a voice call.

 

Does anyone have a thought/recommendation on a phone that gets better reception?  I would prefer to stick with Android just because I am in their ecosystem, if possible.  Not looking to buy a 2019 flagship, but just wondering what that is current or from the past few years might work a little more reliably....

 

Thanks in advance!

 

I am so depressed with the RF performance of the Essential phone. It's a great phone with everything other than the RF reception, and that's basically a deal breaker. I live in an area that has pretty good coverage so it's not as much of an issue, but when I'm traveling there are places I know I should have coverage and I don't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Thomas L. said:

I am so depressed with the RF performance of the Essential phone. It's a great phone with everything other than the RF reception, and that's basically a deal breaker. I live in an area that has pretty good coverage so it's not as much of an issue, but when I'm traveling there are places I know I should have coverage and I don't. 

Yup, I agree entirely.  I had hoped that what I had been reading online before I bought it was just people who are complainers, but turns out this was a time to listen to the internet.  Also, was worth listening to Shade and Joski above who suggested going Moto.  The formfactor still has me cringing a little, but making phone calls without fear is way worth it.  (Plus it has great specs and is cheap!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hello again everyone.  

Bringing this topic back up about a year later since it's black Friday time and deals are to be had on handsets.  

Have been using the Moto Z2 for the last year with fairly good results.  I like the durability and the mods are handy for when I have a long day and need the battery.  

But recently my wife's phone has been acting very strange and she has been missing lots of calls or texts were not getting delivered.  After multiple factory resets, she is up and running, but I want to see about swapping her into a new phone.  The Pixel 3a is on my list, but I wanted to see if anyone here can comment on its network performance.  Or should I look at another Moto or a Samsung?

 

Thanks!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • https://technologytodaynow.com/삼성-갤럭시-s25-시리즈-출시일-앞당기나/ You will need to translate. Did anyone get 10% off coupon for s25? I was being pestered to allow samsung marketing notices but said no.
    • https://samlover.com/2024/11/14/one-ui-7-beta-program-nears-launch-with-more-preparation-than-expected/ Moving new AI features to 7.1 guarantees the S21 will only have the circle to search type feature. Longer wait for the rest of us.
    • Took advantage of a Boost deal to get an "unlimited" line for $11.50 for one month to test Dish's network. So far performance has been great. If they ever get around to deploying their 20MHz CBRS and 20MHz DoD, they would easily clear 1Gbps on a lot of sites. So far I've only dropped off of Dish's native network only once, in an underground garage. When it fell off, it switched to AT&T's network which had one bar of Band 12. When you run a test on AT&T, speeds weren't throttled but ping times were high at over 100ms compared to the 25-35ms pings on Dish's native network. My fastest test so far was inside Nathan's in Coney Island this evening. Pic of the site included. — — — — — Currently the only carrier outperforming them in my house is T-Mobile. They get faster speeds than AT&T and a stronger signal than Verizon.
    • https://ir.echostar.com/news-releases/news-release-details/echostar-corporation-announces-successful-completion-various They have pushed off debt for at least 6 years, except for 139 million. It is secured by spectrum.  They want to put this money towards completing their build out.  Hopefully this includes some midrange capacity.
    • Just revisiting the RCS issue and discussing another point I find odd.  Yeah, my family and close friends and most coworkers still mostly use whats app in our chats due to the odd RCS issues.   Some have Apple phones, some Samsung.  But using Facebook Messenger or Whats App handily eliminates those issues.   But the other thing I find odd is how all the information out there states that to use the Smart View app to mirror your phone to your TV that your TV and your phone have to be on the same wifi network.  That is 100 percent untrue.  I've historically not had wifi at home and only use it in our common areas in our community or occasionally at work.  But primarily I just use my phone for everything and do not have wifi at home.  It's because I haven't needed it.  I've been using all my Samsung phones for the better part of a decade now as my entertainment center because it's simple, effective, portable and absolutely does not require a wifi connection for my TV in order to cast all the content from my phone.  I'm not sure why it is stated that it is required.  The two devices - as we all no doubt know - create a wifi direct connection between the two devices in order for smart view to work, however, no general wifi network is required at all.  Again, I've been enjoying the feature for close to a decade but I find it odd that they say that you need wifi at home to use it.  Samsung television sets, Roku TV sets, LG TV sets (I cast to all of them at work regularly, again, sans wifi) and TCL TVs are all compatible.  There are likely more but these are the ones that I regularly screen mirror to, again, without the two devices being on the same network (this is separate from the notion of creating a wifi direct connection between the 2 in order to enable the service). This is the sole reason I only buy Samsung phones.   I tried a Pixel device before the Pixel 8 (which was the first to allow display out via wired connection for streaming) but it simply did not offer the same feature.   I wonder why they say this.  It's interesting if nothing else.  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...