Jump to content

Wireless Financial Reporting Season


marioc21
 Share

Recommended Posts

Verizon is first out of the gate with Q1 results.

 

Highlights:

  • Added 734,000 new customers. 501,000 net postpaid adds.
  • 3.2 million iphones sold during quarter. 2.1 million LTE smartphones sold. 2.9 Million total LTE devices.
  • 8 million total LTE subscribers
  • 93 million total customers.

 

sources:

http://newscenter.verizon.com/press-releases/verizon/2012/verizon-reports-double-digit.html

http://www.mobileburn.com/19315/news/verizon-sold-32-million-iphones-21-million-lte-smartphones-in-q1-2012

 

AT&T Will be next up on 4/24 followed by Sprint on 4/25 and Deutsche Telekom (T-Mobile) on 5/10.

 

Any thoughts where sprint will wind up?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know how sprint will perform being that nextel customers are dropping like flies. As far as total subscribers though I hope they have a net increase in postpaid customers. Personally I am more curious to see their quarterly financials more than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they post subscriber growth like they did last quarter. Plus I hope they start gaining profit too. Otherwise I'll be upside down on my Sprint stock too. (gulp)

 

Sent from Joshs iPhone 3Gs using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope they post subscriber growth like they did last quarter. Plus I hope they start gaining profit too. Otherwise I'll be upside down on my Sprint stock too. (gulp)

 

Sent from Joshs iPhone 3Gs using Forum Runner

 

Reporting a profit is too much to hope for. Until they completely shut down nextel and complete the majority of their NV deployment I doubt they'll report a profit. I think continued subscriber growth and ARPU growth would be good signs. Along with lower subscriber churn.

 

Very interested to listen to earnings call and hear what they might have to say about LTE roaming with RCA partners.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very interested to listen to earnings call and hear what they might have to say about LTE roaming with RCA partners.

 

I'm very interested in that too. However, I think they will wait until the shareholders meeting to discuss that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm very interested in that too. However, I think they will wait until the shareholders meeting to discuss that.

 

There was an article from last week that had Bob Azzi or some some other VP saying they would discuss this more during the earnings call. Who knows, they probably won't say anything really substantive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporting a profit is too much to hope for. Until they completely shut down nextel and complete the majority of their NV deployment I doubt they'll report a profit. I think continued subscriber growth and ARPU growth would be good signs. Along with lower subscriber churn.

 

Very interested to listen to earnings call and hear what they might have to say about LTE roaming with RCA partners.

 

You really have to look at more than just the bottom line, Sprint for example has a huge amount for depreciation expense. Depreciation is a non cash expense so if you back that out of the equation then they wouldn't be in the red at all, that's what makes the cash flow statement so important. I haven't taken the time to look into detail of their financial statements but if you look at their cash flow statements, even though they show a loss every quarter, they still show positive cash flows over the same period and a lot of it has to do with adding back in the non cash depreciation expense. Now that was my little positive spin on them but in reality though they are getting their asses kicked, and they are paying for it by getting into long term debt. I really hope this network vision buildout really brings customers in by the boat load, so they can start to reduce the amount of debt they have gotten themselves involved with trying to stay afloat.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 93 million total customers.

 

 

I wish the authors of the article had been more precise. They have 93 million RETAIL customers. Their total wireless customer count was 108 million at the end of the year. They should have between 109 - 110 million TOTAL customers now (including wholesale).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish the authors of the article had been more precise. They have 93 million RETAIL customers. Their total wireless customer count was 108 million at the end of the year. They should have between 109 - 110 million TOTAL customers now (including wholesale).

 

Funny because the 93 million came from Verizon's own earnings press release. Verizon didn't mention wholesale customers in its news releases or the financials they put out. Will have to wait and see their 10-Q and see if there's more info.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You really have to look at more than just the bottom line, Sprint for example has a huge amount for depreciation expense. Depreciation is a non cash expense so if you back that out of the equation then they wouldn't be in the red at all, that's what makes the cash flow statement so important. I haven't taken the time to look into detail of their financial statements but if you look at their cash flow statements, even though they show a loss every quarter, they still show positive cash flows over the same period and a lot of it has to do with adding back in the non cash depreciation expense. Now that was my little positive spin on them but in reality though they are getting their asses kicked, and they are paying for it by getting into long term debt. I really hope this network vision buildout really brings customers in by the boat load, so they can start to reduce the amount of debt they have gotten themselves involved with trying to stay afloat.

 

Exactly. They've been writing off the Nextel merger for basically the last five years. They've also had to write down their investment in clearwire a couple of times. That's basically why they've reported losses for so many quarters in a row. Operationally, they seem to be doing ok. Revenues are increasing. ARPU has increased the last few quarters. Customer growth has overall been positive even though it's mainly been due to prepaid a lot of times. As far as debt goes, they seem to be managing it. We'll get a clearer picture next week but they've managed to basically refinance what's been coming due and replacing with debt due 5 to 10 years out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny because the 93 million came from Verizon's own earnings press release. Verizon didn't mention wholesale customers in its news releases or the financials they put out. Will have to wait and see their 10-Q and see if there's more info.

http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/verizon-releases-q4-results-sees-jump-in-revenue-broadband-sub/

 

If you see the 4Q11 press release linked above, they had 92.2 million RETAIL connections and 108.7 million TOTAL wireless connections at the end of 2011. The 93 million number is RETAIL customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.engadget....-broadband-sub/

 

If you see the 4Q11 press release linked above, they had 92.2 million RETAIL connections and 108.7 million TOTAL wireless connections at the end of 2011. The 93 million number is RETAIL customers.

 

Not disputing you. Just said Verizon didn't bother to report their total subscriber numbers this quarter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised that they didn't report wholesale customers. Maybe that's just something they do at the end of each year.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surprised that they didn't report wholesale customers. Maybe that's just something they do at the end of each year.

 

Sent from Joshs Evo Shift using Forum Runner

 

Whoever they tasked with preparing their news release probably didn't think it was that important. And the financial people apparently agreed. It's probably included in the 10-Q filing with the SEC, but that doesn't seem to be available on EDGAR yet. It'll probably be a couple days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think while Verizon is trying to get their spectrum deal approved, they will be intentionally understating their subscriber numbers, or making them sound less than they are. Keep pushing just the retail numbers publicly.

 

It may be a strategy, since their other performance indicators are so high, why talk up the subscribers numbers too? If the FCC is constantly hearing numbers less than 100M, makes Verizon seem less formidable than over 100M. That 100M threshold is huge. Even if just psychological. That's just my opinion. :imo:

 

Robert

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think while Verizon is trying to get their spectrum deal approved, they will be intentionally understating their subscriber numbers, or making them sound less than they are. Keep pushing just the retail numbers publicly.

 

It may be a strategy, since their other performance indicators are so high, why talk up the subscribers numbers too? If the FCC is constantly hearing numbers less than 100M, makes Verizon seem less formidable than over 100M. That 100M threshold is huge. Even if just psychological. That's just my opinion. :imo:

 

Robert

 

That could very well be the reason the T-Mobile merger didn't go thru. Plus the fact that with T-Mo outta the way, at&t would be the only national GSM carrier in the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That could very well be the reason the T-Mobile merger didn't go thru. Plus the fact that with T-Mo outta the way, at&t would be the only national GSM carrier in the country.

I think while Verizon is trying to get their spectrum deal approved, they will be intentionally understating their subscriber numbers, or making them sound less than they are. Keep pushing just the retail numbers publicly.

 

It may be a strategy, since their other performance indicators are so high, why talk up the subscribers numbers too? If the FCC is constantly hearing numbers less than 100M, makes Verizon seem less formidable than over 100M. That 100M threshold is huge. Even if just psychological. That's just my opinion. :imo:

 

Robert

 

FCC knows exactly how many subs VZN has.

 

I think the bigger question isn't if VZN will get the spectrum purchase approved - it is the cable companies + VZN partnership that faces bigger hurdles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

FCC knows exactly how many subs VZN has.

 

I think the bigger question isn't if VZN will get the spectrum purchase approved - it is the cable companies + VZN partnership that faces bigger hurdles.

 

I am a high level bureaucrat on a state level. Do not give your government so much credit.

 

I see every day assumptions, misused numbers, miscalculations, misunderstandings, errors, ineptitude, and the list goes on and on. Just because the FCC somewhere officially in a database or in an application has the right number, doesn't mean the committee overseeing the application will use those numbers in making their decision.

 

Do you know how many legislative and/or committee meetings where I have heard public officials quote statistics they have heard from the media instead of the official ones they should be using? Countless. My idea I put forth is more than plausible and is based on my personal experiences. But I recognize its only a theory. There is no definitive way to know what VZW is up to unless they tell us.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FCC knows exactly how many subs VZN has.

 

I think the bigger question isn't if VZN will get the spectrum purchase approved - it is the cable companies + VZN partnership that faces bigger hurdles.

 

I agree... Verizon (landline) with FiOS is a direct competitor to some of the cablecos that Verizon Wireless is trying to pair up with.... the partnership will be tenuous at best. I think VZW really wants to BUY the spectrum-- the long term partnership is probably not high on their priority list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree... Verizon (landline) with FiOS is a direct competitor to some of the cablecos that Verizon Wireless is trying to pair up with.... the partnership will be tenuous at best. I think VZW really wants to BUY the spectrum-- the long term partnership is probably not high on their priority list.

 

The partnership isn't high on Verizon's priority list but it is on the Cable Cos priority list.

 

Verizon wants nationwide AWS. Cable cos want a real wireless partner.

 

It will be interesting to see how this shakes out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

VZW is smart and shrewd. The cable cos are outdated dinosaurs. I have a feeling we already know who wins in this setup.

 

If the cablecos could think long term, Sprint is a better partnership. However, only looking through the wireless porthole of 2011-2012, Sprint/Clearwire seems like a bad idea. VZW will always come up roses.

 

Robert - Posted from my E4GT with ICS using Forum Runner

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT&T has released it's quarterly earnings now. Here are the highlights:

  • 5.5 million smartphones sold. 30% of which were LTE capable. AT&T now has 59.3% of its wireless customers on smartphones.
  • 61% of smartphone customers are now on tiered data plans compared to 38% a year ago. 70% have chosen higher tier plans.
  • 726,000 total net wireless adds. Churn of 1.1%. Postpaid net adds were 187,00.
  • Total revenues of $31.8 billion, $16.1 billion from wireless and $6.1 in wireless data revenues.

Here's the press release: http://finance.yahoo...-112500083.html

 

If i'm reading the press release right AT&T is counting just under 104 million total wireless cutomers (postpaid, prepaid, devices, etc.). VZ still hasn't filed it's 10-Q so there's no comparison amount yet.

 

Didn't see this in the press release but gigaom picked it up. Of the 5.5 million smartphones ATT sold, 4.3 million were iphones.

 

http://gigaom.com/apple/at-att-iphone-continues-to-boom/

 

Sprint is up tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sprint's financials are out. As expected they lost money again. Here are the highlights:

  • Operating loss of $255 million. Total net loss of $863 million. Includes $543 million in depreciation expenses due to shutdown of Nextel equipment.
  • 1.1 million total customers added. Brings total wireless customers to 56 million.
  • 1.5 million iphones sold. 44% to new customers.
  • Sprint added 263,000 net post-paid customers while Nextel lost 455,000 postpaids. There were 228,000 customers who transferred from Nextel to Sprint. Total net loss of 192,000 postpaids.
  • 489,000 net prepaid customers added.
  • 785,000 net wholesale customers were added.
  • Sprint brand has 29 million customers. Nextel is down to 3.8 million.
  • Sprint postpaid churn for the quarter was 2.0%. Prepaid churn was 2.92%

Network Vision highlights:

  • 600 sites on air
  • Zoning completed for 9,700 sites.
  • Leasing agreements completed for 7,700 sites.
  • 3,200 sites are in "notice to proceed" status. Work has started on 3,000.
  • Sprint expects 12,000 sites on air by end of 2012.
  • 1,300 iden sites has been shutdown, expects to shutdown 9,600 by end of third quarter.
  • Still expects to launch 6 major cities by mid-year.

Here's the press release:

 

http://finance.yahoo...-110000111.html

 

The conference call is at 8:00am. Here's the link:

 

http://services.chor...rint120425.html

 

 

edit: added total customer counts by brand.

Edited by marioc21
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Just figured out this is a waste of time. US Mobile and Verizon lock the eSim to the emei while T-Mobile only uses it to see that you have a capable phone, like Red Pocket does with physical sims (although RP does keep track of what phone you are using it on with the emei.)  So @Trip was right in this case on liking physical sims.
    • Verizon has a reputation for being frugal with MVNOs. After looking around, I also decided US Mobile was my best option. People have gotten C band on it.  Hoping for esim for my S21 Ultra.  No luck so far.  Red Pocket does not claim Verizon 5g, although they say Soon!(TM).  I do see some 5g with it. Typically MVNOs are deprioritized, thus I am reluctant to claim truly getting top speeds with one.
    • Did some exploring yesterday/last night and didn't find a shred of C-Band, including with my brand new US Mobile SIM. Did find 4CA CBRS but the site seemed backhaul constrained; both that plus 15x15 B2 and band-locked 2/66 got me 190 Mbps or so.
    • Did some more exploring yesterday/last night and I think I spotted some LAA downtown but didn't get a chance to confirm before it went away in favor of mmW, which also went away pretty quickly. Also saw another n66 site, as well as an n2 site, making AT&T the second carrier to run n2 DSS within a few miles of me. I think at this point they won't be able to advertise anything flashy, but due to the sheer amount of CA they're throwing at customers here they can keep their network at 50+ Mbps until they can deploy both 3.45 and 3.7, and that's probably enough.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...