Jump to content
Nextel49

Sprint Tmobile merger Disc.

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, bretton88 said:

So if CPUC denies it, but the feds approve it, does it matter that California denied it?

Sent from my SM-N960U1 using Tapatalk
 

New York would say no it does not matter.  I assume Sprint could close down or sell its California business if needed.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, dkyeager said:

New York would say no it does not matter.  I assume Sprint could close down or sell its California business if needed.

Sell all the Sprint cell sites and stores to some type of holding company.  Then start quietly moving all customers and employees over to T-Mobile.  Surely there would be  away to get around some politicians.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
New York would say no it does not matter.  I assume Sprint could close down or sell its California business if needed.
I could see, if necessary, Sprint and T-Mobile selling all California assets and the possibilities of completely pulling out of California if necessary.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, kct1975 said:

I could see, if necessary, Sprint and T-Mobile selling all California assets and the possibilities of completely pulling out of California if necessary.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk
 

There are ways to get around the political bull.  T-mobile-Sprint would not ever totally pull out.  Just go with t-mobile, quietly move all Sprint subscribers to T-mobile, close sprint stores or re-name them.  You can bet it would get done somehow.  Sprint would just disappear.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I could see, if necessary, Sprint and T-Mobile selling all California assets and the possibilities of completely pulling out of California if necessary.

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

California if it was its own country is something like the 6th largest economy in the world. The companies won't pull out.

Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There will have to be sufficient grounds and California law to be able to deny it and let it stand (or any state for that matter).  California has courts too.  And something like this would be unprecedented and could end up in the Supreme Court pushing the bounds of the 10th Amendment.

Robert

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope it works...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hope it works...
I personally want Sprint to stick around for a long time.

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, danlodish345 said:

I personally want Sprint to stick around for a long time.

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
 

I think Sprint can expand on its own, but it will just take longer than people want them too. Sprint (on their own) has made great strides just in the past two years in my opinion). 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Sprint can expand on its own, but it will just take longer than people want them too. Sprint (on their own) has made great strides just in the past two years in my opinion). 
Okay I don't disagree with you there. They have definitely made improvements. I just want to see overall coverage expansion and some more densification. Obviously that would take lots of time and lots of money. And we all know their financial situation. So I'm waiting to see with interest what happens here.

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't good news for the merger...

 

Democrat 2020 hopefuls press Trump to sink T-Mobile, Sprint $26.5 billion merger

 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/democrat-2020-hopefuls-press-trump-administration-to-sink-26-5-billion-t-mobile-sprint-merger

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, kct1975 said:

This isn't good news emoji438.png for the merger...

 

Democrat 2020 hopefuls press Trump to sink T-Mobile, Sprint $26.5 billion merger

 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/technology/democrat-2020-hopefuls-press-trump-administration-to-sink-26-5-billion-t-mobile-sprint-merger

 

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

It will be fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, danlodish345 said:

Okay I don't disagree with you there. They have definitely made improvements. I just want to see overall coverage expansion and some more densification. Obviously that would take lots of time and lots of money. And we all know their financial situation. So I'm waiting to see with interest what happens here.

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk
 

Sprint is spending lots of money. TMobile has been doing just fine with $4~5 billion on CapEx for several years.  Sprint is back up at this level.  If they maintain it, it just depends where they'd want to put that money.   They have excellent extended roaming agreements, and have one with TMobile for three more years. Out of site upgrades, site density, market growth expansion and new native coverage, I can see new native coverage being at the bottom of the list due to these agreements. Especially if Sprint wants to be a city leader in 5G NR.

Edited by red_dog007
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sprint is spending lots of money. TMobile has been doing just fine with $4~5 billion on CapEx for several years.  Sprint is back up at this level.  If they maintain it, it just depends where they'd want to put that money.   They have excellent extended roaming agreements, and have one with TMobile for three more years. Out of site upgrades, site density, market growth expansion and new native coverage, I can see new native coverage being at the bottom of the list due to these agreements. Especially if Sprint wants to be a city leader in 5G NR.
Hmm thats a solid argument which I wont disagree with but...in my area sprints density is terrible especially off of the main highway.. A new cell site or two is needed for sprint to fill in two roaming holes that are huge.....and the same could be said for tmobile with density...

Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

Sprint is spending lots of money. TMobile has been doing just fine with $4~5 billion on CapEx for several years.  Sprint is back up at this level.  If they maintain it, it just depends where they'd want to put that money.   They have excellent extended roaming agreements, and have one with TMobile for three more years. Out of site upgrades, site density, market growth expansion and new native coverage, I can see new native coverage being at the bottom of the list due to these agreements. Especially if Sprint wants to be a city leader in 5G NR.

If T-Mobile would keep the Sprint roaming agreements after they merge with Sprint, the combined company would have incredible coverage.  The Sprint roaming agreements are extremely useful (and expensive) in keeping Sprint mobile devices usable in coverage holes.  The T-Mobile network is a little better than Sprint's in some areas but in other areas is far worse and just goes to no service since T-Mobile currently has many areas with no roaming agreements.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If T-Mobile would keep the Sprint roaming agreements after they merge with Sprint, the combined company would have incredible coverage.  The Sprint roaming agreements are extremely useful (and expensive) in keeping Sprint mobile devices usable in coverage holes.  The T-Mobile network is a little better than Sprint's in some areas but in other areas is far worse and just goes to no service since T-Mobile currently has many areas with no roaming agreements.
Actually if TMobile can continue to expand coverage that would be absolutely fantastic. And not just rely on roaming agreements. As you just said roaming Agreements are pretty expensive. So it would really be and the new carriers interest in building out new coverage. Obviously that's a very expensive and complicated process logistically. So I would really like to see what would happen.

Sent from my SM-T837T using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, radem said:

If T-Mobile would keep the Sprint roaming agreements after they merge with Sprint, the combined company would have incredible coverage.  The Sprint roaming agreements are extremely useful (and expensive) in keeping Sprint mobile devices usable in coverage holes.  The T-Mobile network is a little better than Sprint's in some areas but in other areas is far worse and just goes to no service since T-Mobile currently has many areas with no roaming agreements.

Forgot all about T-Mobile roaming, I haven't seen it in a long time all I get is 3G when I lose LTE now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, BlueAngel said:

Forgot all about T-Mobile roaming, I haven't seen it in a long time all I get is 3G when I lose LTE now.

What happens when you set your phone to LTE-only in a 3G area?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What happens when you set your phone to LTE-only in a 3G area?
I think the person loses service.

Sent from my SM-T837T using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×