Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Denver area has reverted to EV-DO for most of the day. Signs of progress I hope.

Posted

Denver area has reverted to EV-DO for most of the day. Signs of progress I hope.

 

I bet if you cycle airplane mode or restart eHRPD comes back. That happens to me here in the Missouri market every once in a while.

Posted

Tried that multiple times, it was reverted, no doubt about it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

Posted

Tried that multiple times, it was reverted, no doubt about it.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

 

Well, I wouldn't read too much into it. Since there's no LTE at the moment in the market, it's not needed anyway, so they may just be applying an update to the system, or it just got rebooted for an unknown reason.

Posted

By that logic, there would be no LTE in any market at this point. And, technically, there is LTE in the Colorado market, in addition to sites in progress. But I won't plan on LTE arriving here. Ever. As Chicago shouldn't have done last year. And L.A., and Philly. Oh well. It was nice to dream once upon a time about LTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

Posted

By that logic, there would be no LTE in any market at this point. And, technically, there is LTE in the Colorado market, in addition to sites in progress. But I won't plan on LTE arriving here. Ever. As Chicago shouldn't have done last year. And L.A., and Philly. Oh well. It was nice to dream once upon a time about LTE.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

 

What?

 

There's no LTE in the Colorado market. Aside from the in-building supposed LTE at the call center.

 

I'm not sure by what logic it would mean there's no LTE anywhere else either. You've completely lost me.

Posted

Where is there Lte in colorado?? where i would drive to test it out i dont think there is any Lte yet in colorado?

 

Don't bother. There is a blip on Sensorly at one of the call centers in Centennial, but other members who have checked it out weren't able to get anything. We think it's an in-building system not available to anyone else.

Posted

So when we likely going to start to see some Lte testing or some kind of roll out u think???

 

Hasn't changed since the last time you asked. Sometime late Spring (June) or this summer.

Posted

What?

 

There's no LTE in the Colorado market. Aside from the in-building supposed LTE at the call center.

 

I'm not sure by what logic it would mean there's no LTE anywhere else either. You've completely lost me.

 

I think Craig was trying to be funny. I didn't detect anything serious in his post.

 

Robert

Posted

I travel on D line each day and now around englewood co mo phone is loosing 3g connection so I wonder if there is one tower in that are that being worked on for lte

Posted

The tower near my house (yale and i25) was down to 1x this morning. Hopefully that means something good...bandwidth upgrades maybe...even if its just for EVDO *crosses fingers*

Posted

Is there any updates for the colorado market for 800 or 1900 Lte?? and quick question i have the airave and i was wondering once we have Lte here in the springs will i need the airave still or will Lte make it so i dont need it and send it back to sprint???

Posted

quick question i have the airave and i was wondering once we have Lte here in the springs will i need the airave still or will Lte make it so i dont need it and send it back to sprint???

I think you may be asking your question in the wrong way. LTE is for data, so whether you have LTE shouldn't matter at home for Wifi is a better alternative than LTE or an Airave.

 

Once CDMA 1xA in SMR is deployed you might not need the Airave to make calls.

Posted

"Are there any updates for the Colorado market?"

 

We're there any posted in the recent updates that Robert works so hard on? NO.

I'm a very patient person by nature but good Lord. . .

 

If you're that anxious, spend some time and effort and find out for yourself. Go look at towers and look to see if anything has been done to them. If so, note the tower, snap some pics and post it to the "In Progress" thread. Otherwise, when you see it in the updates, then you'll know that, yes, there are updates for the CO market.

 

Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk HD

  • Like 1
Posted

First LTE site accepted in Colorado!!!! YEAH!

 

It's south of Brighton. It's just south of the I-76 and 470 junction. Near Buffalo Run Golf Course on 104th. It will be on the Sponsor maps later today. Congratulations you Centennial Staters. Now go park under the tower, light up a blunt and go to town.

 

Robert

  • Like 3
Posted

First LTE site accepted in Colorado!!!! YEAH!

 

It's south of Brighton. It's just south of the I-76 and 470 junction. Near Buffalo Run Golf Course on 104th. It will be on the Sponsor maps later today. Congratulations you Centennial Staters. Now go park under the tower, light up a blunt and go to town.

 

Robert

 

This is great news, however I feel a little disappointed by the location. I was expecting something more urban, but I guess that's exactly how they've been doing NV nationwide. Start in suburban markets then slowly get to the dense urban areas. Like how the Loop in Chicago doesn't have NV, but everywhere around it does.

 

But progress is progress, so I guess I'm just going to have to be patient.

Posted

This is great news, however I feel a little disappointed by the location. I was expecting something more urban, but I guess that's exactly how they've been doing NV nationwide. Start in suburban markets then slowly get to the dense urban areas. Like how the Loop in Chicago doesn't have NV, but everywhere around it does.

 

But progress is progress, so I guess I'm just going to have to be patient.

 

The thing about location of the site order is...well, it's not selected. Sprint would love to do them in order of usage. However, some sites are much easier and faster to get approvals, permitting and high speed backhaul to. Once a site is ready and has everything they need to convert, they jump right on it.

 

Typically, permitting is faster in exurban and rural areas, and tougher in cities and NIMBY suburbs. Also, backhaul is typically easier to get in newer suburbs and rural locations along major roads, railroads and highways.

 

Since Sprint is upgrading their entire network, all sites will be worked on the second they are ready to start work, regardless of location. And given the ease of getting things ready, it will often begin in exurban, tertiary and rural areas first. It's better than doing nothing, just waiting for the more important sites to become ready.

 

If Sprint ever gets to the point where they have significant backlog of urban/suburban sites ready, they will completely stop working on exurban/rural sites all together.

 

Robert

Posted

Boo yah! Nothing on sensorly yet. May have to leave early for the airport before my next trip Friday and make a quick side trip. Happened sooner than I thought it might. Here's to rapid build-out and fast connections.

Posted

How fast will the first tower in denver be could it be at least 5meg to 10 meg or how fast? im thinking about heading up to denver tomorrow to test it out!

How far away from the tower are you going to be? Distance can be related to speed.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Vinegar Hill is getting the Brooklyn Heights treatment now with regard to small cells. I mapped two more small cells in the neighborhood in the past few days so now T-Mobile is up to 8 of them in such a tiny neighborhood. While it's cool they're doing this since it means outdoors you get a consistent 400Mbps+ almost everywhere, it sucks because they're obviously deploying so many of them to make up for their lack of a macro site in the entire neighborhood. Because there isn't a macro, the small cells have a greater coverage area than you see in other neighborhoods and you often connect to them while indoors but coverage and speeds fall off indoors much faster on small cells than on macros in my experience.  Even Dish has better coverage than T-Mobile in Vinegar Hill since they added the site on top of the Extra Space Storage building alongside AT&T and Verizon. T-Mobile needs to get in line with their competitors there.
    • It seems like that is the smallest Google Play System change that google releases. I see 12 MB updates really regularly. 
    • Went back to Greenville last week and what an insane change 4 years has made! Every site in the city has n25/41/71 now and T-Mobile has even added new sites in the city since the last time I was there. As a result, their coverage and speeds are great everywhere. Unfortunately I don't have my Verizon line anymore so I'm unable to compare their performance to T-Mobile but they definitely had better coverage and speeds than AT&Tin my testing.  On the LTE side of things, T-Mobile has 5MHz Band 71, 10MHz Band 66, and 5MHz Band 2 deployed. On the 5G side, they have 190MHz n41, 15MHz n25, and 15MHz n71 deployed. As you'd expect 5G is several times faster than LTE here because of that. One thing I noticed though is that T-Mobile's speeds pretty much never go above 1Gbps here. I'm not sure if it's a backhaul limitation or if they're seriously pushing their 5G home internet product here but on most sites I was seeing 500-600Mbps with some sites having peaks in the high 800s-low 900's. I also noticed that upload speeds weren't nearly as good as they were in NYC. I attribute this to the fact that site spacing often cause the phone to drop to n25 or n71 for uploads as opposed to using n41. I have a handful of high (>100Mbps) upload speed tests but that was with me virtually right next to a site. Since I drove my own car instead of riding with family, I used the opportunity to map a ton of rural roads outside to Greenville to see what kind of coverage I'd get. T-Mobile has stepped up their game a ton in this regard as I found that coverage matched and in many cases surpassed what I was seeing on AT&T. areas where AT&T dropped to 1 bar or even no signal, I held onto weak n71 and was still able to place calls using VoNR. There are still areas where I would drop signal but those were areas where I'm certain the only carrier available was U.S. Cellular since they still have a ton of macros that they're the only tenant on. The U.S. Cellular merger won't add much to T-Mobile's spectrum coffers there; they'll increase 600MHz from 20MHz to 30MHz, gain another 10MHz of AWS, and acquire the rest of the 24GHz band, but they'll gain a ton new sites to bolster their rural coverage in this area and make it pretty much the best in the region.  — — — — — I also mapped Dish while down there. Dish's doesn't have much spectrum in Pitt County, they only have 5MHz n71, 25MHz n70 and 5MHz n29. This lack of spectrum combined with what is pretty much a skeleton/license protection network meant that in most cases I was only on 1-2 bars of n71 indoors and while outdoors I wasn't seeing speeds nearly as good as I get in NYC. While directly in front of a site I could get over 300Mbps but in most cases while out and about I wasn't seeing over 100Mbps. In fact, at my hotel I was only able to get about 5Mbps down and 2Mbps up on n71. Maybe as they densify I'll see more consistently high speeds but their lack of spectrum will remain a huge bottleneck much like it was for T-Mobile pre-Sprint merger. — — — — — AT&T and Verizon are the only carriers with small cells in Greenville. Verizon has a significantly larger deployment than AT&T though, with AT&T having it along some roads where they have weaker coverage while Verizon seems to be using them for added capacity Uptown and especially around ECU. They started being installed around 2019 but none of them have 5G as far as I can tell, only LTE. AT&T also has C-band and DoD deployed on every site in the city, giving me speeds in the range of 350-400Mbps in most areas. — — — — — Here are some photos of small cells in Greenville.  
    • Just checked and found a 12MB Google Play System update ready to download.    Still October 1 for the date after however. 
    • Looks like my little area finally has some decent mobile connectivity. Still have a few dead spots on both tmo and firstnet... https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/10549791800  
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...