Jump to content
Craig

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)

Recommended Posts

Hi folks! I've been lurking for a bit on this thread but figured I should go ahead and sign up. The info I'll add to the mix is that it appears Sprint is working on fiber optic builds to their cell sites along the front range. That's going to take time (most of the summer I'm guessing) but once it's done it should really help the performance of the system. If you know of local Sprint towers in your area that you're tracking you should look them up on this map and see if there is anything going to it. Make sure 'Fiber - Under Construction' layer is selected.

http://www.zayo.com/interactive-network-map

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice! Thanks for the link. I can trace some of the Under Construction lines straight to towers near me. Awesome! Great to know that there is some serious work going on. Hopefully once they finish the fiber lay, it will be a fast activation of NV 3G and LTE. I gotta think that they are going to try and have most of the towers fitted with NV panels and equipment so as soon as the fiber is run, they can test and flip the switch.

 

Edit: Looks like a large part of downtown Denver is already sporting some lit fiber. That's a good sign for sure!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very nice! Thanks for the link. I can trace some of the Under Construction lines straight to towers near me. Awesome! Great to know that there is some serious work going on. Hopefully once they finish the fiber lay, it will be a fast activation of NV 3G and LTE. I gotta think that they are going to try and have most of the towers fitted with NV panels and equipment so as soon as the fiber is run, they can test and flip the switch.

 

I'm not privy to any inside information, but I would hope that they would proceed in parallel with the NV upgrades and the fiber build. It's different contractors and I would think there would be few if any dependencies between them. My contract isn't up till January so I'm a ways away from getting an LTE phone. Hopefully the fiber installs will speed 3G before then. I strongly suspect a lot of the towers around here have pretty sad backhaul currently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've noticed some increases in 3G speeds around town over the last 6-9 months. Some places that were unusable previously (DIA for example) have had a marked improvement in speeds. This tells me that even some simple backhaul improvements on legacy 3G are already paying dividends.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if the city and county of Denver fiber cut was related to that fiber work for sprint towers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also see eHRPD as my network type downtown denver. I hope that means LTE soon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What fiber cut are you referring to?

 

Also, eHRPD has been turned on over the CO market since Nov. Just my WAG, but I say we'll have a few LoDo LTE towers active by end of summer and a handful of suburbs as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, eHRPD is almost everywhere in Denver and northern Suburbs, and 3G data speeds have been improving. As long as I can get 2 bars or better I'm getting 1 to 1.5 Mb download speeds. Hopefully your guesses about LTE will come true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the comcast fiber was cut last friday leaving city network unavaiable in some locations.

I had read that eHRPD can be installed as software update and no LTE upgrades are installed. Also eHRPD should allow talking and surfing at the same time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
the comcast fiber was cut last friday leaving city network unavaiable in some locations.

I had read that eHRPD can be installed as software update and no LTE upgrades are installed. Also eHRPD should allow talking and surfing at the same time.

 

eHRPD does not enable talking and surfing at the same time. That requires a phone that is SVDO or SVLTE capable.

 

Sent from my SPH-L900 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got off the phone with a sprint rep and he told me that co springs colorado will be getting Lte in the next 90 days with 43 towers of 800 megahertz im so ready for this update! Its about time that we get this update!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In about 60 days nextel network will be shutdown so sprint can run back haul and install new equipment in 30 days ?

I hope sprint will install 1900/800 lte or our phones will not work with 800 lte and knowing sprint they will not send us new phones with 800 mhz lte and none of the current phones have 800 mhz lte

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got off the phone with a sprint rep and he told me that co springs colorado will be getting Lte in the next 90 days with 43 towers of 800 megahertz im so ready for this update! Its about time that we get this update!!

 

I'll believe this when I see it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I just got off the phone with a sprint rep and he told me that co springs colorado will be getting Lte in the next 90 days with 43 towers of 800 megahertz im so ready for this update! Its about time that we get this update!!

 

Sprint reps can see a tool where they can look at sites and it will tell them which ones are slated to get 3G 800, 3G 1900, 4G 800 and 4G 1900 upgrades for the next 3 months. To me it sounds like they saw legitimate info and reported it to you. So that's probably legit.

 

However, whether Sprint and their Contractors will hit those dates is another thing entirely. That being said, Samsung is making an aggressive push to get all their remaining markets under way before Summer. So it's coming either way.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought 800 mHz was a long term plan that was at least a year away. They won't even have the 800 mHz iden shutdown until June 30. Do they even have any phones that handle 800 mHz LTE? I think my Galaxy III is 1900 LTE only.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought 800 mHz was a long term plan that was at least a year away. They won't even have the 800 mHz iden shutdown until June 30. Do they even have any phones that handle 800 mHz LTE? I think my Galaxy III is 1900 LTE only.

 

I'm thinking we COULD see some 800 MHZ Lte in late Q4 of this year, and i hope we have phones out that will support that within the next 2-3 months.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought 800 mHz was a long term plan that was at least a year away. They won't even have the 800 mHz iden shutdown until June 30. Do they even have any phones that handle 800 mHz LTE? I think my Galaxy III is 1900 LTE only.

 

800 1x. Not LTE. There are markets where 800 SMR is being used for 1x where there is enough spectrum available. Once the iDen shutdown occurs, they will be able to turn on 800 SMR wherever the equipment has been installed and calibrated.

 

The 800 LTE FIT should be installed soon, with plans for 800 LTE to being installs in the Chicago and South Bend markets in the next three months or so.

 

There are currently no phones that support 800 LTE, and we likely won't see any until Q3 or Q4 of this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought 800 mHz was a long term plan that was at least a year away. They won't even have the 800 mHz iden shutdown until June 30. Do they even have any phones that handle 800 mHz LTE? I think my Galaxy III is 1900 LTE only.

When we say 800, it can mean CDMA 800 and/or LTE 800. CDMA 800 has been being deployed for over 6 months. A dozen markets already have some CDMA 800 service live. It will be deployed even more widespread after iDEN shutdown.

 

LTE 800 has only been deployed in FIT areas so far. But starting this summer LTE 800 will start deploying in earnest. LTE 800 cannot go live until after iDEN shuts down at the end of June.

 

So it's closer than many realize. Sprint says they will start selling LTE 800 devices before the end of the 3rd quarter. So probably in September. CDMA 800 has been included in most Sprint devices the past two years.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When we say 800, it can mean CDMA 800 and/or LTE 800. CDMA 800 has been being deployed for over 6 months. A dozen markets already have some CDMA 800 service live. It will be deployed even more widespread after iDEN shutdown.

 

LTE 800 has only been deployed in FIT areas so far. But starting this summer LTE 800 will start deploying in earnest. LTE 800 cannot go live until after iDEN shuts down at the end of June.

 

So it's closer than many realize. Sprint says they will start selling LTE 800 devices before the end of the 3rd quarter. So probably in September. CDMA 800 has been included in most Sprint devices the past two years.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Thanks for the clarification. When I spoke of 800, I was speaking of 800 LTE, not CDMA. The roadmaps I read indicated that 800 LTE was the very last piece to be put in place and to expect it sometime in 2014 at the earliest. You seem to have information that it is being moved on earlier than originally planned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification. When I spoke of 800, I was speaking of 800 LTE, not CDMA. The roadmaps I read indicated that 800 LTE was the very last piece to be put in place and to expect it sometime in 2014 at the earliest. You seem to have information that it is being moved on earlier than originally planned.

 

It will not be widespread until 2014. But it will be available in limited pockets in several markets in 2013. And we should have a few devices on sale that support it in the 4th Quarter.

 

Robert via Nexus 7 with Tapatalk HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did anybody else see this? I know this mainly affects western Kansas but it hits Colorado some too. Are they just throwing in the towel in these areas? Or is it part of the iDen turndown? Or did these towers get sold to somebody else? It seems a little disconcerting for that much of Sprint's network to be just going away, even if it is sparsely populated.

 

http://support.sprint.com/support/article/Learn_more_about_network_changes_coming_to_portions_of_Kansas_and_Oklahoma/case-gz982789-20111212-190208/?ECID=vanity:coveragechange

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting. First I heard anything about that coverage change. In all reality, it won't affect me in any capacity as I don't spend any time in that area. For those customers that reside in that area, it could be a deal breaker, however. It would be interesting to hear the reasoning/cause behind this rather large native network service dismissal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Did anybody else see this? I know this mainly affects western Kansas but it hits Colorado some too. Are they just throwing in the towel in these areas? Or is it part of the iDen turndown? Or did these towers get sold to somebody else? It seems a little disconcerting for that much of Sprint's network to be just going away, even if it is sparsely populated.

 

http://support.sprint.com/support/article/Learn_more_about_network_changes_coming_to_portions_of_Kansas_and_Oklahoma/case-gz982789-20111212-190208/?ECID=vanity:coveragechange

 

This has been discussed intensively around other threads here. This was never coverage by Sprint but coverage by partners. And they have decided not to renew with Sprint to provide native coverage . It will still be available for Sprint roaming though. No net effect for Sprint customers unless you lived in the affected areas.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been discussed intensively around other threads here. This was never coverage by Sprint but coverage by partners. And they have decided not to renew with Sprint to provide native coverage . It will still be available for Sprint roaming though. No net effect for Sprint customers unless you lived in the affected areas.

 

Robert via Samsung Note II via Tapatalk

 

Cool, thanks for the info. I do drive I-70 headed east a fair amount but my plan has (in theory) unlimited roaming. It sounds like things will work pretty much the same for me when I'm out that way, just the carrier display will change.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • There might be a u.fl connector inside for a GPS antenna, but I really don't know. There should be pictures on the FCCs website if you feel like digging. How many satellites does it see? Is there a large building outside the window where your magic box is? Anything significantly blocking the view of the horizon and sky? If so, is there a different spot you can move it? Sent from my Pixel 4 XL using Tapatalk
    • Is there any way to connect an external GPS antenna?  While my phone can get a good GPS lock, the MB Gold does not seem to be capable of doing so.  I don't mind taking this thing apart if it is possible.
    • Writing this from a few miles west of Fredericksburg, where my phone defaults to 5 MHz of B2 unless I flat-out block that band. No idea why, as B2 performance is can't-run-a-speedtest poor here. B66 is fine, with something like 15x15 spread over a few channels, though upload speeds are poor. NR is hit-or-miss (mostly miss); I'm not seeing more than ~-110 RSRP on B71 so that cell site is apparently nowhere near here. Thing is, since that spectrum is so quiet, I can still pull 20-35 Mbps down on that band (10x10), though of course upload speeds are poor. On the way here, I hit my highest-ever NR download speed: 201 Mbps, just north of where 290 WB merges into 281 for a bit. Uploads are low (~4 Mbps) and jitter was high, and I believe that was on 15 MHz of n71 plus >= 25 MHz of CA'd LTE (2+12+66 I think) but still impressive. I hit 179/22.7 right before. Basically as soon as we hit the Belterra shopping area west of Austin, the network went from being capacity constrained to...not. NR wasn't available for most of the trip, but LTE turned in some solid speeds (70/10) on T-Mobile. There was a point along the way where there was a near-complete dead zone...no Sprint, T-Mobile, or even AT&T roaming. I *might* have had 1x the entire time, but I think that even that dropped for about a half-mile. Sprint B26, then B25, were the first to come back, with T-Mobile B2 a mile or two later. If T-Mo put 600 wherever that Sprint site is on the west side of that dead zone, pretty sure there would be no more dead zone. As an aside, B12 lower-A/B are owned by West Central Wireless near Fredericksburg, so T-Mobile doesn't have B12 here, only B71 and mid-and. In contrast to T-Mobile's performance, Sprint had usable B41 most of the way, though there were points where my phone dipped to B25/26 if I didn't force 41. Actually got the fastest B41 download speeds I've seen on my phone around Deep Eddy, at 196/4 and 179/5. I think this was even on a MiniMacro rather than a full cell site. Finally, yesterday east of Pflugerville (east of Lake Pflugerville) I hit 86.7/46.6 on 10 MHz of n71. Yes, some of that was CA, and yes, that's in a sweet spot where you're at the edge of urban cell spacing but are on a sector pointed out into the countryside, but I'll take it. By contrast, Sprint's MiniMacro had poor service there.
    • They won't have to deploy midband RRUs to meet deployment requirements since 600/700/800 travels further, and the tech is the same for both. Midband will be solely a capacity play, since that'll get them 40 MHz of downlink and 15 MHz of uplink in most areas (see https://www.fiercewireless.com/wireless/wake-doj-deal-where-dish-s-spectrum-and-how-much-does-it-have). That's on top of low-band, which after n26 comes online will be 20x15 (albeit split over three different bands) at least, and a symmetric amount more in some markets. With a comparatively minuscule customer count, the network should fly with that amount of spectrum. My guess is that in three years Dish won't have touched 30% of the US population, so T-Mobile will be able to renew 600 licenses in those areas uncontested, including in plenty of rural areas, for another three years. For the remaining 70% of the US population (which will be a pretty small % of territory, so a rather small number of licenses), there'll be areas where Dish will try to squeak by with a low-band-only build, and *those* are the areas they'll be compete more on for spectrum leasing. For areas where there's enough traffic to build out mid-band, Dish may or may not need the extra 600...and those are probably the same areas T-Mobile will have a blanket of n41...so competition for that spectrum may be a bit more tepid, with the winner being whoever has more 600 sites lit since site density will determine capacity. One interesting thing to note here: Boost already sells a phone that's (partially) compatible with Dish's upcoming network: the S20 (n66 and n71). In pure dollar terms, they're subsidizing that phone the most our of their entire lineup, selling it at $720. Still spendy, but at least they'll have *some* phones in the field that support the new network, and as time goes on they'll be able to sell the S20 for cheaper. Assuming they're okay with folks dropping down to T-Mobile LTE for voice since the X55 modem can't do VoNR, and sitting primarily on n71 because the phone can't aggregate NR-NR. It's probably worthwhile for them to get a variant of the S20 recertified with n70, as that's adjacent to bands 66 and 25 so radio performance should still be fine. That would give the S20 access to their full native mid-band network on a phone most likely to be picked up by the folks who'd use the most data on their network. With all that said, I would *not* expect Dish to pick up any more 5G phones until they're able to get one with an X60 or equivalent modem; having a network spread across slices of five bands from the get-go means NR-NR aggregation is important, and it'll take VoNR to keep phones from dropping down to roaming on TMo to make phone calls. So I don't expect Boost will get the A51 5G or A71 5G...better to sell LTE-only phones and then introduce phones with better chipsets later, to avoid heavily subsidizing phones twice. Then, once you've got a $400 phone with VoNR, sell bundle it with two months of unlimited-everything service and you're off to the races. I figure we'll be at that point by this time next year, at which point I'll probably pick that phone up to see what Dish's network is like...as long as they allow tethering at full speed.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...