Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

That's not grounds for a class action lawsuit.  Your network upgrades will LARGELY be complete within the time period it said.  It did not say wall to wall LTE.  It did not even say LTE at all.  Also, you waived your right to a class action lawsuit when you signed your contract with Sprint.

 

Robert

LARGELY complete does not mean just a few isolated spots over a mile from my house and I see no indication that this will change in the next 2 weeks.  The text encouraged us to upgrade to 4g phones, advertising 10x data speeds, so this does imply we should be able to use them within a month.  Also, I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure a coorporation cannot make you sign away your rights when you use their product.

 

I have given Sprint the benefit of the doubt for the past year which is why I am still with them, but if they are advertising a mostly completed network with 4G in the next month, they better deliver.

Edited by davem2020
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LARGELY complete does not mean just a few isolated spots over a mile from my house and I see no indication that this will change in the next 2 weeks. The text encouraged us to upgrade to 4g phones and linked to a page with them for sale, so this does imply we should be able to use them within a month. Also, I am not a lawyer, but I am pretty sure a coorporation cannot make you sign away your rights when you use their product.

 

I have given Sprint the benefit of the doubt for the past year which is why I am still with them, but if they are advertising a mostly completed network with 4G in the next month, they better deliver.

It's sad that you don't even know what you signed, yet you're willing to argue about it. Sprint didn't make you sign anything, you walked into their store and asked for contracted service. You are only entitled to what you agreed in the contract regardless of what Sprint says in a text after the fact.

 

The network build out will be pretty much complete in your area, as Sprint said. But LTE will not. And the text didn't say it would. You are reading too much into it.

 

If you're going to threaten Sprint, find another place to do it. We aren't going to host your ignorant threats.

 

Robert via Samsung Note 8.0 using Tapatalk Pro

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The network build out will be pretty much complete in your area, as Sprint said. But LTE will not.

What did he mean by this then?

 

I know it's hard to understand tone on the Internet. I'm not trying to be difficult. Lol

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What did he mean by this then?

 

I know it's hard to understand tone on the Internet. I'm not trying to be difficult. Lol

 

Sent from my SM-N900P using Tapatalk

 

 

If you consider the number of sites that have had NV equipment installed, the build out is nearly complete. However, as Merlin said, every last site has to be installed and integrated before they can fire up the clusters.

 

So it is largely complete, but not complete. 

 

Now, it's possible they start firing things up before the end of the month, but I wouldn't count on it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's see a Signal Check screenshot, and your location.

 

I suppose it's possible they have it powered down, but not likely. If you are getting a weaker 1x signal on 800 than you were on PCS, it's almost always because you're connecting to a site further away.

uploadfromtaptalk1392213896763.jpg here is screen shot from work after a prl update

 

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Lurking, Waiting, I went by a set of towers at Bandimere in Littleton yesterday. There were 2 techs just getting ready to hoist themselves to the the towers. Was that you??? Everytime I see someone working on a cell tower, I think of you! Santa....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will not launch Spark service in Denver until all the NV 3G upgrades are nearing completion and CSFB operational.  Currently Triband smartphones will not stay connected to Spark sites because there is very little CSFB deployed around Denver.  Only hotspots and Triband phones in LTE Only mode are able to connect to the ~100 Spark sites in the Colorado market.

 

Robert

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.  

Is that the only place it's working? 

Edited by Daemon42
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.  

Is that the only place it's working? 

 

Yes, it's one of the few places where the surrounding sites are 3G upgraded with CSFB in place. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I missing something, or is that assertion inconsistent with what I posted a couple pages ago?

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/2172-network-visionlte-colorado-market-denvercolo-springsfort-collinspueblogrand-jct/page-87&do=findComment&comment=280428

Solid, working 4G LTE with eHRPD from my Triband phone in Golden, CO.

Is that the only place it's working?

 

You might be connected to 4g but not to band 41

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So in that context, it isn't considered a "Spark site" unless it includes connectivity to band 41? 

Just trying to get the nomenclature clear.  

 

Technically, Spark is a reference to Band 41 and the speeds associated with it. However, Sprint is calling their whole network Spark. It's a little confusing, and a bit misleading. 

 

But yes, we only consider Band 41 to be Spark sites. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a couple of us are confused.  So we are waiting for all the towers in Denver to have the NV upgrade, that will move them to the updated version of Sprints network.  This doesn't mean 4G LTE is going to happen, just 3G on the NV Network.  Then we have to wait for the 4G LTE to roll out.  Meanwhile , those with Tri Band phones, get to play around with the "Spark" Network on some of the towers that have been upgraded to NV but not 4G LTE.  So Sprint is already rolling out another network while working on the second "4G" Network?  I didn't even get WIMAX in my neighborhood, do I have any hope for any of the new networks?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess a couple of us are confused.  So we are waiting for all the towers in Denver to have the NV upgrade, that will move them to the updated version of Sprints network.  This doesn't mean 4G LTE is going to happen, just 3G on the NV Network.  Then we have to wait for the 4G LTE to roll out.  Meanwhile , those with Tri Band phones, get to play around with the "Spark" Network on some of the towers that have been upgraded to NV but not 4G LTE.  So Sprint is already rolling out another network while working on the second "4G" Network?  I didn't even get WIMAX in my neighborhood, do I have any hope for any of the new networks?  

 

If you check out the NV Sites map, hopefully it will make more sense.

 

We are waiting for the clusters around Denver to be complete so they can fire them up. Once they bring the 3G side of things online, they can rapidly bring up LTE. If you look at Colorado Springs, it should progress similarly (though a lot more sites and a lot more work). 

 

There was one day when pretty much all the sites in the Springs were accepted and 3G was brought online. This allowed CSFB to be put in place, meaning that Tri-Band devices would be able to use LTE. Then, over the next several days, LTE was activated site by site until every one that had appropriate backhaul had LTE live. That covered most of the city.

 

Now, obviously Denver has a lot more sites, which is part of the reason it's taken longer.

 

And yes, they are currently working on TD-LTE, or Band 41 LTE in Denver, which is on Clear network sites. That upgrade has progressed pretty well, and if CSFB was in place, Tri-Band devices would be able to use it. It will have roughly the same footprint as WiMax for the time being.

 

But you don't need to worry about not getting LTE. Sprint is working to upgrade the whole network. When the clusters are fired up and 3G is activated, that means that LTE equipment is also in place. As long as appropriate backhaul has been brought in (Fiber, microwave, etc.) by the local ISP, LTE will be fired up within a couple of days.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is saying that. 

I might say that, I might not. But it wouldn't be wrong.

 

Hey Lurking, Waiting, I went by a set of towers at Bandimere in Littleton yesterday. There were 2 techs just getting ready to hoist themselves to the the towers. Was that you??? Everytime I see someone working on a cell tower, I think of you! Santa....

No, climbing towers is not in my job description, nor any ericsson, sprint, or samsung tech. We leave the climbing to the plebs. Their training is basically "don't die, don't hurt yourself, bolt goes here, cable goes here" 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...