Jump to content

Network Vision/LTE - Colorado Market (Denver/Colo Springs/Fort Collins/Pueblo/Grand Jct)


Craig

Recommended Posts

Nice, I'll have to do some driving around tomorrow.  I live right near the CSU campus.  3G has gotten better recently (with good reason).  Seeing lots of 1x800 up here.

 

Do you have any idea which band of LTE you are getting? I don't have a tri-band device.

 


Just took this about 10 minutes ago here in Fort Collins.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice, I'll have to do some driving around tomorrow.  I live right near the CSU campus.  3G has gotten better recently (with good reason).  Seeing lots of 1x800 up here.

 

Do you have any idea which band of LTE you are getting? I don't have a tri-band device.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So this ping is not accurate then?

That was in edgewater but I was really close to the tower.

 

 

Yes, and no. There will be times when that ping is normal, there will be times when it is 3-4 times that.

 

I shouldn't get too far into the specifics but that site is likely the first branch on the network ring. Top of the food chain.

 

And you can't really say what the resting ping will be until the full network is active.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Nice, I'll have to do some driving around tomorrow.  I live right near the CSU campus.  3G has gotten better recently (with good reason).  Seeing lots of 1x800 up here.

 

Do you have any idea which band of LTE you are getting? I don't have a tri-band device.

 

 

For some reason you message contents didn't show up here but I saw it in the email notification.  Robert said above that the Spark icon will show for all bands of LTE (which of course is confusing).  I couldn't get any LTE driving around a little bit this morning.  I went on the south side of campus on Prospect and then took shields south.  It could be that they were testing it yesterday or that it is just Band 41 that is active.  Let me know if you get it again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and no. There will be times when that ping is normal, there will be times when it is 3-4 times that.

 

I shouldn't get too far into the specifics but that site is likely the first branch on the network ring. Top of the food chain.

 

And you can't really say what the resting ping will be until the full network is active.

 

Network Vision contracts require 90ms ping times minimum when tested unburdened.  Even at the terminal end of a microwave chain.  Sites that cannot achieve 90ms are supposed to be corrected.  But a lot of rule bending has occurred to keep things moving.

 

Robert

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, and no. There will be times when that ping is normal, there will be times when it is 3-4 times that.

 

I shouldn't get too far into the specifics but that site is likely the first branch on the network ring. Top of the food chain.

 

And you can't really say what the resting ping will be until the full network is active.

forgot to mention that those speeds where on 3g not LTE if makes a difference :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

So this ping is not accurate then?

That was in edgewater but I was really close to the tower.

 

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

 

forgot to mention that those speeds where on 3g not LTE if makes a difference :)

 

It should be plenty accurate. It's the Sensorly speed tests that I don't trust. The Ookla app tends to work great, because they have many, many servers to choose from across the country.

 

Sensorly, on the other hand, only has a few, and the app tends to pick the one furthest from you for some reason (and you can't change that) resulting in inflated ping numbers and inaccurate download speeds. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to this forum, and I don't know all the technical stuff.  I am hoping LTE comes to Denver soon.  FWIW, here are two speedtests of an LTE signal I'm getting in downtown Denver.  The Ookla was yesterday (the fastest of about five tests), and the Sensorly is today, same location.

 

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5eaa6o3keegohuc/speedtest.jpg

 

 

post-34175-0-49305100-1391803023_thumb.jpg

Edited by denverm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Network Vision contracts require 90ms ping times minimum when tested unburdened.  Even at the terminal end of a microwave chain.  Sites that cannot achieve 90ms are supposed to be corrected.  But a lot of rule bending has occurred to keep things moving.

 

Robert

 

It's that "unburdened" part that changes as the rest of the network is brought on. When we test for acceptance we patch the site out of the network ring, test the connection, and then patch it back. The point is to test the connections and equipment that was contracted out to the 90ms standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a question for those of you in the know. On the site cellrecption.com. Sprint is only showing 7 towers in the Denver area. Through my app Lte Discovery, I have followed signals to neighborhoods with no towers. Is sprint using the airrave small deskstop computer towers all throughout Denver to upgade their reception? I had one. It quit working about 2 months ago. (From what I see here, that would have been about the time they were working on 4GLTE in SE Aurora) They offered me another one for free, but I didn't feel I needed it. So my ultimate question is: Is Sprint's layout of 4G Lte in Denver, predicated on replacing every one of those Air rave boxes for newer ones with 4GLTE technology?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a question for those of you in the know. On the site cellrecption.com. Sprint is only showing 7 towers in the Denver area. Through my app Lte Discovery, I have followed signals to neighborhoods with no towers. Is sprint using the airrave small deskstop computer towers all throughout Denver to upgade their reception? I had one. It quit working about 2 months ago. (From what I see here, that would have been about the time they were working on 4GLTE in SE Aurora) They offered me another one for free, but I didn't feel I needed it. So my ultimate question is: Is Sprint's layout of 4G Lte in Denver, predicated on replacing every one of those Air rave boxes for newer ones with 4GLTE technology?

I can tell you now that sprint has alotttttttTTTTTT more sites than 7. If you can, a donation would let you see the sites in your area and which ones have been upgraded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a question for those of you in the know. On the site cellrecption.com. Sprint is only showing 7 towers in the Denver area. Through my app Lte Discovery, I have followed signals to neighborhoods with no towers. Is sprint using the airrave small deskstop computer towers all throughout Denver to upgade their reception? I had one. It quit working about 2 months ago. (From what I see here, that would have been about the time they were working on 4GLTE in SE Aurora) They offered me another one for free, but I didn't feel I needed it. So my ultimate question is: Is Sprint's layout of 4G Lte in Denver, predicated on replacing every one of those Air rave boxes for newer ones with 4GLTE technology?

 

Airaves aren't for data... they're for Voice. There will be no LTE upgrade for Airaves that I'm aware of. And no, that is not how Sprint builds out its network!

 

Until the sites around the city are upgraded, most tower locating apps are going to fail, as sites often broadcast a location offset from their actual location.

 

Don't trust other sites for tower locations either. Network.sprint.com will show you sites that have seen some sort of upgrade in the last 6 months, only S4GRU shows you where every single cell site is. And there are WAY more than 7. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My airave does voice and data, I get a regular 3g signal and am able to use internet as if I had a strong 3g signal from a tower. But it doesn't really matter because my airave is hooked up to a wireless router so wifi is much faster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My airave does voice and data, I get a regular 3g signal and am able to use internet as if I had a strong 3g signal from a tower. But it doesn't really matter because my airave is hooked up to a wireless router so wifi is much faster.

 

Did you have to pay the 99 for that? Or did Sprint provide it because of poor coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My airave does voice and data, I get a regular 3g signal and am able to use internet as if I had a strong 3g signal from a tower. But it doesn't really matter because my airave is hooked up to a wireless router so wifi is much faster.

 

True, they can do EVDO, but their main purpose is voice coverage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, looks like a post m1 migration 3g signal to me. We're working on that ping, one of the drawbacks to having a massive network ring, but oh the joy when it is done.

what does post m1 migration 3g signal mean? so the lower the ping the better? i was in blackhawk and inside a hotel room and the ping was 1.0003. something like that. i do know it was a 1.oosomething

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New to this forum, and I don't know all the technical stuff.  I am hoping LTE comes to Denver soon.  FWIW, here are two speedtests of an LTE signal I'm getting in downtown Denver.  The Ookla was yesterday (the fastest of about five tests), and the Sensorly is today, same location.

 

 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5eaa6o3keegohuc/speedtest.jpg

 

Roughly where was this taken?

 

For some reason I haven't been able to connect to any of the LTE blips that have been around downtown for a week or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...