Jump to content
RAvirani

Coverage Map Update 10/15/17

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, Sprint’s coverage map received a  big update today. USCC roaming is now extended! Additionally the map is now full screen. 

Native coverage now appears to be more accurate (at least in my market) as well as detailed. Take a peek and see for yourselves!

  • Like 6
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whoa! Lots of big changes finally on the map, Thanks for the heads up!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is actually huge news for when I go to visit family in Eastern NC now. It also looks like they finally got around to updating Upstate NY. Most of the interstates show LTE now.

  • Like 3
  • Love 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not showing Shentel's B-41 LTE Plus in much of their territory.  It does show   in York, PA and some of Harrisburg, PA.  But nothing to the south along I-81 into Maryland and Virginia. It was showing in previous mapping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shows Cellcom LTE roaming in Northern WI.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like there's more (small) areas of 3G/roaming surrounded by LTE coverage.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the Extended LTE on USCC actually confirmed? 

 

The handful of towers in East Kentucky, Im assuming PCS protection sites, now have LTE!

Edited by red_dog007
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, red_dog007 said:

Is the Extended LTE on USCC actually confirmed? 

 

The handful of towers in East Kentucky, Im assuming PCS protection sites, now have LTE!

They do! Paintsville's site now has B41, B25, & B26! Allen and Prestonsburg have B25. The Pikeville site was still 3G as of last Thursday, I'm heading there tomorrow morning. Curious to see if it changed over the weekend to LTE or the map is just incorrect.

And yes, these 4 sites were previous Horizon PCS (Out of Chillicothe Ohio) installations. I am really loving my Sprint situation in East Ky.  I have B41 in town, and good Extended LTE via Appalachian Wireless Band 12 pretty much everywhere else. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their coverage map actually doesn't show LTE Roaming anymore.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sprint has seriously gotten to work in the last few months eliminating the rest of the 3G-only sites. It should have happened years ago, but we're finally there. 

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, clbowens said:

Their coverage map actually doesn't show LTE Roaming anymore.

How about that....

Roaming is now "Extended LTE" or "Off-network Roaming".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, burnout8488 said:

Sprint has seriously gotten to work in the last few months eliminating the rest of the 3G-only sites. It should have happened years ago, but we're finally there. 

not exactly there are some still

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, joshnys8913 said:

not exactly there are some still

Not many if any 3g only sites left less than 1% at most.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, joshnys8913 said:

not exactly there are some still

Just a few, many markets have 100% LTE now, at least at a site level, maybe not footprint wise (thinking of GMOs which may have a slightly more limited range). It is a huge improvement in numbers over even a few months ago.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Flompholph said:

Not many if any 3g only sites left less than 1% at most.

EXACTLY, but I do know of two that still are 3G only just from personal checking/traveling.

5 minutes ago, Dkoellerwx said:

Just a few, many markets have 100% LTE now, at least at a site level, maybe not footprint wise (thinking of GMOs which may have a slightly more limited range). It is a huge improvement in numbers over even a few months ago.

I was just saying, I do know there are SOME left, I actually know of two still as of today 10/16/17 that are in another market in my area. 

 

Again just was passing along my experience as of recent is all....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, joshnys8913 said:

EXACTLY, but I do know of two that still are 3G only just from personal checking/traveling.

I was just saying, I do know there are SOME left, I actually know of two still as of today 10/16/17 that are in another market in my area. 

 

Again just was passing along my experience as of recent is all....

And the post you quoted didn't say they were all gone, just that significant work had been made toward eliminating the remaining 3G only sites.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Dkoellerwx said:

And the post you quoted didn't say they were all gone, just that significant work had been made toward eliminating the remaining 3G only sites.

ok well whatever insignificant. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went by a 3G-only site over the weekend that has a permit filed.  Still 3G.  (Checked this morning and the permit isn't granted yet for some reason.)  Got my fingers crossed; it's one of the very last ones in the area.

I'm incredibly pleased about US Cellular no longer counting as roaming, assuming that's true.  That makes me significantly less likely to want to jump to T-Mobile if they ever get US Cellular roaming working.

- Trip

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Columbus has two 3g only sites left, both with 1900 and 800 rrhs. Shentel has 3g only gmo sites remaining in the area.

Sent from my LG-LS980 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a great improvement in how the map displays full screen. Looks like a lot of areas are now more accurate. I do wish the colors had more contrast as you zoom in on an area but it is definitely a big improvement. Hope they continue to improve and densify their LTE coverage. Will be glad when it gets to my area and they fill in the remaining holes in Ohio.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you guys think that the LTE Extended areas are areas where Sprint thinks they will "eventually" provide native coverage or do you think they will just always leave it up to partner extended coverage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, clbowens said:

Do you guys think that the LTE Extended areas are areas where Sprint thinks they will "eventually" provide native coverage or do you think they will just always leave it up to partner extended coverage?

Assuming the partner delivers satisfactory performance per an SLA and improves its own network, I don’t think it makes sense for Sprint to prioritize building native coverage in those areas until the rest of its network gets densified, etc.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/16/2017 at 6:25 AM, spike331 said:

Shows Cellcom LTE roaming in Northern WI.

Some is shown but not all if you compare with Cellcom's maps.  I wonder if its true as shown or if it was just a bug in their map data...?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, snowmobiler487 said:

Some is shown but not all if you compare with Cellcom's maps.  I wonder if its true as shown or if it was just a bug in their map data...?

That’s how the old map with “3G and More” kind of looked. Maybe they cherry picked certain sites.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Band 71 expansion sighted in South Jersey

      Sent from my LM-V405 using Tapatalk

    • My info came from a trusted S4Gru source.  It may have gotten garbed somewhere along the way since Band 26 list not listed in any of the related 5G tables.  I believe larger SCS directly improves transmission rates in Mbps, iirc. I really liked another link you just posted about fine grain TDD.  Hopefully this is used by Sprint in the initial 5G NR  implementations as it might fix the band 41 upload issues some people have even moreso that having a 60MHz to 100Mhz carrier.  https://medium.com/5g-nr/5g-nr-the-new-radio-interface-for-5g-2b769a59ea80
    • For those asking about qam. Does everyone for that cell sector use 256 qam? (in range of or phone support) If not your the only one going to see the 33% increase. So your old speedtest x 1.33. Examples 1Mbps to 1.33 Mbps or 5Mbps goes to 6.5 Mbps. Another would be 20 Mbps to 26 Mbps all within margin of error with speed test. That gain starts to go away fast as people use more data. Where qam even massive mimo help is large events. Otherwise you have people on the fringe with weak signal weaking their effectiveness.
    • This is exactly what I am going to be doing. I have 2 galaxy S-7's both with deteriorating batteries. When the S-10 hits the shelves, surely the S-9 will go on sale somewhere.  I either get  a new S-9 at a good discounted price, or I get one on Swappa, or maybe buy the new "A" series Samsung phone.   No S-10 for me.  If the S-7's had HPUE, I would probably just get new batteries in the S-7's.
    • Frankly I think what cannibalizes their high end sales is picking up last year's model on Swappa or even used on a carrier's site. We'll see how much of a value price point the S10e comes in at, but I'm guessing at least $700, so not much of a mid range value. LG could really offer an attractive alternative, but they price their flagships just as high as Samsung, but then drop in value even more months down the road.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×