Jump to content
Andrew Revering

Samsung Galaxy S8 & Dual Sim/Duos

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, clbowens said:

Anybody having any issues with this update?

What you mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, SeanK_ said:

What you mean?

I'm just trying to see if anybody has had any issues with this update before I install it.  I know that has happened in the past, even with small, security update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So far so good for me

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, clbowens said:

I'm just trying to see if anybody has had any issues with this update before I install it.  I know that has happened in the past, even with small, security update.

I was thinking you were having issues, but I haven't so far.

 

Doesn't this fix the KRACK WPA2 weakness? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, SeanK_ said:

I was thinking you were having issues, but I haven't so far.

 

Doesn't this fix the KRACK WPA2 weakness? 

 

It should fix the KRACK issue as that was patched in the Nov security update by Google. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Things have been pretty good since I upgraded earlier, no complaints. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, mmark27 said:

 

It should fix the KRACK issue as that was patched in the Nov security update by Google. 

What’s the whole KRACK thing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Krakatoa!

lkdkL.gif

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If past is any indication, then it will either be next Monday or Tuesday.  Looking forward to improved battery life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is running soooooo much better than beta 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Terrell352 said:

It is running soooooo much better than beta 3

yeah, I want back in! There is no way to do this according to the "Samsung Experts" I chatted with. :sadpanda:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  
666mb. I'll get the holy water.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, optimummind said:

What a pleasant surprise it came to us so much earlier this time.  My DL size is different from the Korean and UK models at 508.03 MB (QL8)(955U1).  What was the DL size for the Sprint version?  

I am on beta 3.  My download is at 508.03 MB

Rzj8KnJ.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Beta 4 still missing VoLTE option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing is for sure. The band 41 and band 25 radio has been improved quite a bit and beta 3 was already good. Beta 4 has me on b41 that I normally would never be on. I hope this is the baseband that is going to be on the final release.

  • Like 2
  • Love 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/15/2017 at 10:44 PM, Terrell352 said:

One thing is for sure. The band 41 and band 25 radio has been improved quite a bit and beta 3 was already good. Beta 4 has me on b41 that I normally would never be on. I hope this is the baseband that is going to be on the final release.

That's good to hear, baseband improvements are always welcome.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New update is out I'm guessing just security updates. 

Screenshot_20171227-021350.png

Screenshot_20171227-022107.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like it went from the Nov 1 to Dec 1 security patch.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, Galaxyguy said:

Looks like it went from the Nov 1 to Dec 1 security patch.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
 

Yeah new baseband though. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What screen protectors do you guys use/recommend for the S8 (not plus)? Was looking at many on Amazon, and many reviews stating screen protectors don't cover entire screen, or won't stick to edges causing lifting in cases. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Marv1 said:

What screen protectors do you guys use/recommend for the S8 (not plus)? Was looking at many on Amazon, and many reviews stating screen protectors don't cover entire screen, or won't stick to edges causing lifting in cases. 

I use nothing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Quite a number of us have been looking at this issue for months, which I call Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS). For those unfamiliar it eliminates the special 8T8R market GCI and reorders all GCI band sectors first by sector then by band.  Without software help this is uncomprehensible to most people. It took a while to get a reasonable sample of data from all sectors from various sites in various tracked markets.  Sprint was also making changes and initially had various models in different markets.  This has only been seen in Samsung markets, although I have looked at data from ALU and Ericsson markets. It should be noted that Mini Macros and B41 small cells are not affected.  It now seems to have stabilized for a while around what is shown in ingenium's chart: Implementation is growing and is getting faster.  Through the many logs I analyze I have seen it pop up in more and more markets.  Still uncertain as to the reason.  The latest theory is for 4x4 MIMO and 256 QAM with a long line of failed theories behind that one.  There are areas of uncertainty surrounding 1) counties with portions of various b41 radius on different frequencies and 2) the handling of 4th and 5th carriers.  We are hoping that Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) in Columbus and Cincinnati will soon spread to such areas so we have a better data sample.  Currently we only have the area around Youngstown to work with in this regard.  Joski1624 has been key in this along with ingenium. I have handled this with a cutover date for GCIs and tracking expired b41 GCIs.  Early on implementation stretched out over a couple of weeks, but it now seems entire sites are done at once.  I process logs first to find any Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) sites which are ranked into Yes, Maybe, and No.  "Yes" is determined unique GCI endings which can be increased if you have detailed spreadsheet data on the site that is reasonably current.  These become Approved SGS sites with the earliest one becoming the cutover date which is stored for future use.  "Maybe" are unique GCI endings that don't have an expected EARFCN.  Many of these are transition errors but a signification number are for sites where more data is needed.  These become possible SGS sites and are flagged for followup.  The approved SGS site data is then processed for new carriers and missing/changed PCIs.  B41 is converted back to its old GCI including GCI sectors for this purpose plus to provide data for the expired B41 sites.  The expired b41 sites is also used for Mini Macro GCIs that have been replaced with 8T8R in case they appear elsewhere in the future.  This effort allows old spreadsheets to be retained.    Should a market fully convert (none found so far) to Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) it will be worth revisiting this multi-step process to simplify it.  The unresolved issue of sites in counties with portions of various b41 radius on different frequencies is the most difficult for SCP.  Sheets may have to track earfcns for those areas and/or store the SGS sectors for them to be properly rebuilt for SCP "national" logs.  Markets with sheets will want to let SCP know the approved SGS sites as users may not be on the right band or sector to know independently. This way regular sites could be stored in their compressed format while only the SGS sites would need more entries. SCP may need to track SGS sites for markets without sheets based on past key GCI sectors.  This may also be the right time for SCP to allow the direct importation of true site lat/longs as RSRP allows for easier detection of EARFCNs in transition.  Another issue that would help is a more resilient error handling (retries) for rooted modem earfcns.  Currently this is often tripped by other apps such as LTE Discovery (used for its airplane mode like ability) or Network Signal Guru  (for bandwidth, MIMO and QAM detection).  Presently you must exit and restart SCP to regain EARFCN detection in such cases. Based on past history, it is safe to assume that Sprint will not totally upgrade all sites in a market to Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS), but  it will likely dominate  -- it will just take a while in true Sprint fashion.  Many of us S4Gru folks have retained older phones  (I have 4) for assigning to different signal tracking purposes.  The general public often has older phones just like these as their main phone.  Without Sequential GCI Sectors (SGS) support older phones in SGS areas may soon become worthless for interactive signal detection and learning. 
    • Here's my multi-point theory on why Sprint isn't roaming on VZW for LTE: Fewer Sprint phones have B13 than B12, and at the point that you're roaming on another carrier you want that low-band signal, most of which is still B13 on VZW. VZW charges more for data roaming than AT&T does, and might not even let Sprint do LTE roaming. This is bolstered by the fact that e.g. FreedomPop uses AT&T rather than Verizon as the underlying network for its stuff...they wouldn't use it if it was expensive. Also, add the PH-1 to the list of unlocked/BYOD phones that likely have the same firmware as the Sprint version, and thus get WiFi calling (though the PH-1 doesn't have Calling Plus; fingers crossed that I get VoLTE). I've been in a few RF dead zones (yay hotels!) lately but have seen the phone drop down to native eHRPD rather than swap to roaming on e.g. T-Mo band 12, so my guess is that I won't see aggressive roaming to LTE until the VoLTE soft launch, and maybe not even then.
    • I'll be heading to the UK in a few months and am trying to figure out whether it's worth it to switch off of Open World (this'll be my first time out of the country, so it's not like I'm using CA/MX data anyway) and grabbing a week pass for while I'm there. Specifically, does anyone know which network Sprint roams on in the UK, and whether it's LTE roaming? If the roaming situation is less than ideal, I figure I'll keep Open World and swing by an EE or Three store to pick up a local SIM, using my 3-cent-per-MB Open World data to get there. But if I can get solid coverage on LTE, I'll gladly do the week pass thing to save the hassle of finding a SIM.
    • Pretty sure they can slowly repurpose LTE portion of M-MIMO to 5G nr so that shouldn't be a problem in the very long run. Just like Clear equipment, and those have served their purpose quite well over the last 6 years.
    • It is disappointing that Sprint does not have a not Massive MIMO 5G option.  I assume the price would be significantly less for less robust solution that would allow for both 4G and 5NR.  This would allow more places to have 5NR sooner.
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×