Jump to content

Q4 2015 Sprint Corp Earnings (Jan-Mar 2016)


NYC126

Recommended Posts

Did they announce anything on the 800 mhz

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

Not that I heard.

 

The latest on that would be in Sprint’s Status Report on 800 MHz Band Reconfiguration (May 2, 2016): http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=60001698703

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, does this mean that 800 mhz license is cleared

 

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

 

 

In those areas, yes.  But only in those areas.

 

The areas in red and light green on the map on page 2 of that document still are in limbo apparently. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't had a chance to review the powerpoints or read all of the above posts...

 

Any mention about NGN deployment? Anything else exciting that was uncovered during the Q&A?

 

 

Basically the answer is no and will continue to be no since Sprint doesn't want to make promises that could potentially be detrimental is they don't follow through. It's the mistake Sprint made under Hesse and I'm willing to bet Marcelo won't be making them again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 3rd carrier is showing as it's 2xca + another 20mhz carrier card for a total of 3 carriers on a site? Not showing as 3xca because the the tower needs a software update?

 

Is the 3rd carrier card active as a single 20mhz? If so does that really help? Who gets the one carrier card and who gets the 2xca if phones are equal? Is this another form of network management? Will that affect testing if say root metrics gets the 1 20 MHz vs the 2xca?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Sprint change their financial calendar so 1Q actually means Sept to Dec 2016? or am I mistaken

Sprint fiscal first quarter is april to june.

 

Sent from my LGLS992 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe this at all. Even there coverage map is nowhere near 70% coverage. When Sprint LTE was 70% finished it was easy find it. 2500 at 70% is still non existent for miles. Granted my home site just recieved nokia equipment this week but its still much harder to find a tower with b41 on it.

 

That's in your local area.

 

In the NYC market for example, 2.5Ghz is nearing 90% if not more.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's in your local area.

 

In the NYC market for example, 2.5Ghz is nearing 90% if not more.

Local as in most of north florida. Thats some huge patches of b41 missing to be at 70%. I just don't believe it and you need to see proof.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 3 carrier is showing so it's 2xca + another 20 for a total of 3?

 

How does that help and who gets the one carrier and who gets the 2xca if phones are equal?

Folks with non CA devices get access to that third carrier, effectively off-loading work from the other 2 carriers, in essence bringing up average speeds overall for all users with triband devices.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe this at all. Even there coverage map is nowhere near 70% coverage. When Sprint LTE was 70% finished it was easy find it. 2500 at 70% is still non existent for miles. Granted my home site just recieved nokia equipment this week but its still much harder to find a tower with b41 on it.

I don't think it's 70% of their footprint but 70% of total POP's covered which would mean 210 Million people are covered by Band 41. That doesn't seem too wrong to me.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Local as in most of north florida. Thats some huge patches of b41 missing to be at 70%. I just don't believe it and you need to see proof.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 

Yeah that's a pretty small area when you consider the rest of the country. Also, I actually can see proof ;)

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Local as in most of north florida. Thats some huge patches of b41 missing to be at 70%. I just don't believe it and you need to see proof.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

 Definitely different experience in different markets, here in NYC and NJ I agree with Deval, im on B41 about 95% of time in NYC and bout 85% in NJ.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's an employee so I'm guessing that he has access to glance or some other internal tools that allow him to see the proof, but can't share details publicly.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think it's 70% of their footprint but 70% of total POP's covered which would mean 210 Million people are covered by Band 41. That doesn't seem too wrong to me.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

I agree with your interpretation.

 

From the Quarterly Investor Update:

 

"Total LTE coverage now reaches nearly 300 million people, including approximately 70 percent being covered by the 2.5 GHz spectrum deployment."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't specify whether they mean area or of POP's but it's safer to assume they mean POP's as opposed to area.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

 

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Definitely different experience in different markets, here in NYC and NJ I agree with Deval, im on B41 about 95% of time in NYC and bout 85% in NJ.

95% just outdoor only or both indoor and outdoor?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

95% just outdoor only or both indoor and outdoor?

I'd say for me it's 90%+ outdoors and 70%+ indoors. My neighborhood has horrible site spacing yet I manage to get Band 41 indoors.

 

Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...