Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've always been fascinated by the concept, but when I look at the logistics I always come to the conclusion that while it would be an insanely awesome project it would ultimately be more expensive and slower than available wired internet in my area and all surrounding areas. I guess it comes down to the fundamental drawbacks of wireless vs wired: unpredictable environment factors, increased overhead, and overall lower peak speeds. At least I'm very familiar with Ubiquiti's product catalog as a result. But I've always loved stories like this about it actually working and being relatively cost-effective.

  • Like 1
Posted

This has been in the works for a long time, but was pushed even more in urgency by Hurricane Sandy when that area of the city was underwater.  The network is good for emergency times like that... one connection can assist an entire neighborhood instead of hoping for Internet in the home during a natural disaster.  Allegedly FEMA used what was functioning of it back in 2012.  http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/24/nyregion/red-hooks-cutting-edge-wireless-network.html?_r=0

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...