Jump to content

Sprint International Roaming Preferences


Ascertion

Sprint's international roaming poll  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you prefer Sprint Global Roaming? Or Sprint Open World?

    • Sprint Global Roaming (Unlimited data, slowed to 2G speeds, no overages.)
      20
    • Sprint Open World (1GB of High-Speed data, $30/GB overage.)
      28


Recommended Posts

I'm curious about which one is more popular.  Which one do you currently have enabled, or prefer to have enabled on your line(s)?  According to previous discussion, it appears to be 50/50, and at first I definitely did not like the idea of being charged $30/GB overages, but I've been on slowed speeds before and they are noticeably slow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried Sprint Global Roaming for a week and it wasn't that bad at all. Mostly for texting purposes and lite browsing. Now on Sprint Open World but have yet to try it. Will report back.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've only used Global Roaming in Israel and Russia. When I was in Russia for my layovers Open World would of been great. hHw much data could I use in a few hours. My month only use 10GB so my daily use isn't that much. 
 

I think Open World is great for 1-10 day vacations. But if you have an extended vacation Global Roaming or a local SIM is your best option. I think data should be free or cheaper in Open world if you have a limited data plan to begin with like the family share plans and take from that data pool.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of wish Sprint would combine the two, offer 1gb of high speed, then 2g unlimited with the option of buying a high speed data pass like T-Mobile. 

This would be so great.  Haha The other unique thing that Sprint does different is bills per KB used, so even if you went 1MB over your 1GB allowance, you'll only be billed for that 1MB worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of wish Sprint would combine the two, offer 1gb of high speed, then 2g unlimited with the option of buying a high speed data pass like T-Mobile. 

 

Well it's not just T-Mobile. On Global Roaming, Sprint also gives you 2G unlimited with the option of buying a high speed data pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a cruise from Long Beach to Ensenada. Open World works in Ensenada, and although "3G" data is unusable I can still make calls. I racked up over $100 in international roaming charges when on the open water though. Yikes!99d3e1a6a0c69668c91a121c42a7a944.jpg

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, cruise ship roaming is such a rip off. I wonder if anything can be done there. That could be an "uncarrier" move that Marcelo could beat Legere to.

Legere could call it "The Un-cruise rate" and make a spiffy advertisement for it based on a cruise ship where John Legere is standing on the railings, yelling out "I'm the king of the world!!!", only to be interrupted by a couple standing behind him arguing about their carrier's expensive roaming rate onboard.

 

John Legere could step off the railings to approach them about how if they had T-Mobile, they wouldn't be subjected to the same high cost, unfair carrier moves, yada yada of the Duopoly, then close out the commercial with some typical hip T-Mobile ending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured out why data is not working on Movistar in Ensenada...Sprint turned off data roaming because of what I incurred over international waters. Lesson learned...turn off data roaming until you reach your destination.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, cruise ship roaming is such a rip off. I wonder if anything can be done there. That could be an "uncarrier" move that Marcelo could beat Legere to.

Legere could call it "The Un-cruise rate" and make a spiffy advertisement for it based on a cruise ship where John Legere is standing on the railings, yelling out "I'm the king of the world!!!", only to be interrupted by a couple standing behind him arguing about their carrier's expensive roaming rate onboard.

 

John Legere could step off the railings to approach them about how if they had T-Mobile, they wouldn't be subjected to the same high cost, unfair carrier moves, yada yada of the Duopoly, then close out the commercial with some typical hip T-Mobile ending.

 

That is not going to happen -- not for Sprint, not for T-Mobile.  Micro cell based cruise ship roaming is little but a huge profit play against high rollers who do not care about costs and ignorant tourists who are unaware of costs.  Even one cruise ship guest who used the wireless service the same as he would at home could put Sprint or T-Mobile on the hook for thousands of dollars in roaming charges.  And the profiteering cruise ship wireless operators are not going to play along with Sprint or T-Mobile by lowering their roaming rates so that cruise ship roaming could be included in standard plans. 

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will add that I have been on week long cruises twice in my life.  Once an Alaskan cruise, next a Mediterranean cruise.  Both were before I had a cellphone.  But I am happy to report that I survived.

 

;)

 

AJ

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I moved over to Open World since I don't plan on traveling outside of the Americas anytime soon; for short trips to Mexico and Canada, 1 GB LTE and unlimited calling is plenty as long as you don't do anything dumb like stream video (which you probably won't have access to do anyway). If I were going to Europe, I'd either get a prepaid SIM or go back to Global Roaming since unless you're in an Open World unlimited country (i.e. in the Americas), GR is a better deal because of the free 2G usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2G data in Europe was too slow. Even Google Maps struggled to come up. 3G data was much better. I'd suggest Open World for that reason. $30/GB is reasonable.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Yup, same experience. Global roaming was useless on Sprint as most Web pages and google maps failed to load. Meanwhile my wife had Tmobile and her 2g was fast enough even to tether my wife's family on. When sprint advertises KBps, they means Kbps (I verified this with customer service).

 

I ended up switching to Open World so I could have a working phone. Still waiting to hear what the damage was. Granted it was nerve racking because the networks that Sprint customer service told me to use had different names in the network selection.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, same experience. Global roaming was useless on Sprint as most Web pages and google maps failed to load. Meanwhile my wife had Tmobile and her 2g was fast enough even to tether my wife's family on. When sprint advertises KBps, they means Kbps (I verified this with customer service).

 

I ended up switching to Open World so I could have a working phone. Still waiting to hear what the damage was. Granted it was nerve racking because the networks that Sprint customer service told me to use had different names in the network selection.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

You should be fine since your phone wouldn't be able to connect to networks that aren't Open World partners (or that is what a relief told me).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 2G data in Europe was too slow. Even Google Maps struggled to come up. 3G data was much better. I'd suggest Open World for that reason. $30/GB is reasonable.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

 

I'd tend to agree. I don't see much use in Global Roaming for me until they up the speed a bit. If I were taking the family to somewhere like Europe I'd keep my line and my wife's on Open World as $30/GB is reasonable, as you stated, and switch my kids' lines over to Global Roaming.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still wish Open World provided at least 2 GB of high speed data before charging overages.  Went to Mexico back in Aug and tried to use the "high speed" data but could not connect to the high speed network so it was pretty much useless.  I think for now I'd probably use Global Roaming until things improve and not worry about overages.  Don't care about the calling as much given that there are so many texting apps out there like hangouts or imessage.

 

I assume with Open World you don't get free 1 GB of high speed data in Europe so that is an instant deal breaker to me. So if I were to travel to Europe and wanted to use data, I can't just add the Open World option and just use the 1 GB high speed option without the need for calling.  So if that is true then any international traveler will usually opt for the Global Roaming unless they want to pay $30/GB for data.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still wish Open World provided at least 2 GB of high speed data before charging overages.  Went to Mexico back in Aug and tried to use the "high speed" data but could not connect to the high speed network so it was pretty much useless.  I think for now I'd probably use Global Roaming until things improve and not worry about overages.  Don't care about the calling as much given that there are so many texting apps out there like hangouts or imessage.

 

I assume with Open World you don't get free 1 GB of high speed data in Europe so that is an instant deal breaker to me. So if I were to travel to Europe and wanted to use data, I can't just add the Open World option and just use the 1 GB high speed option without the need for calling.  So if that is true then any international traveler will usually opt for the Global Roaming unless they want to pay $30/GB for data.

 

 

Even better, they should just combine the two into one offer where you get 1GB of high speeds data and then unlimited 2G afterwards. Though, I understand how expensive that would be.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even better, they should just combine the two into one offer where you get 1GB of high speeds data and then unlimited 2G afterwards. Though, I understand how expensive that would be.

 

I would certainly welcome that offer.  But for me, I do international travelling so I would much rather have the unlimited 2G speeds since $30/GB is still pretty steep IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like people prefer the faster data.  If the throttled speeds were usable for most essential things (such as Google Maps), I feel that it'd be better than the Open World choice.  Regardless, thanks for voting.  I was curious as to how things would turn out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like people prefer the faster data.  If the throttled speeds were usable for most essential things (such as Google Maps), I feel that it'd be better than the Open World choice.  Regardless, thanks for voting.  I was curious as to how things would turn out.

 

Well the problem I see with Open World is that it is still very limited.  The free 1 GB of data offer is only good in North and South America and none of the Europe and Asian countries can take advantage of it unless you pay $30/GB from the start.  For international travelers this is an issue.  Perhaps if Open World someday allows the free 1 GB data in all countries I am sure people including myself would consider Open World a more viable option than Global Roaming.  The poll seems a bit misleading since it assumes the 1 GB of high speed data is available worldwide when it is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Looks like there's a slightly taller building going up next door to where the decommissioned site used to be. Taking a look at StreetView, T-Mobile likely decommissioned the site because the east facing sector would blocked by the new building. If I had to guess, T-Mobile has already agreed to move to the roof of the new building and is just waiting for it to be completed to install the site there. What they should've done is just rearrange the sectors in the meantime but it seems like T-Mobile just bit the bullet and decommed the tower in the short term. — — — — — A permit was issued for a Sprint conversion at 150 Prospect Park West, finally filling in what is T-Mobile's largest coverage gap in Park Slope. Verizon is collocated on that building and AT&T has placed small cells along Prospect Park West to fill in coverage there while T-Mobile struggled using two sites, one at Grand Army Plaza at the far north and another at Bartel Pritchard Square to the far south.  
    • Yep, you can see the site was taken down between Aug 2022 and Apr 2023.
    • Verizon site at Woodbury Commons finally got C-band. I'm seeing upwards of 600Mbps there, a massive improvement over the <1Mbps I used to see. LTE is now at 10-20Mbps which is significantly better than before where speed tests would often fail. My only complaint is that C-band is super inconsistent. Not sure if it's a software issue but sometimes I'm connected to it and get the 600Mbps speeds previously mentioned and other times I connect and only see 15Mbps. Seems like whatever load balancing the network is trying to do is still shoving a ton of people to LTE, even in conditions where I have a strong C-band signal.  — — — — — You're absolutely right. The site on top of Bais Sarah Hall at 6101 16th Ave got decommissioned. Sad that they haven't installed a new site to fill in that coverage gap.  — — — — — In other news a carrier reached out to the board of my grandmother's building in Brooklyn about installing antennas on top of it so she called me today because she knows I map cell towers and she said a lot of people in her building, especially the folks on the upper floors, are worried about the health effects lol. I asked her if she knew what carrier it would be but she said she doesn't know. A quick glance at Cellmapper tells me it's either Dish or AT&T since Verizon and T-Mobile both have sites within a two block radius of her building but AT&T barely builds new sites so I'm leaning Dish. They're asking for a 25-year lease with an option to renegotiate the lease after 10-years. The board of her co-op said that if they do it, maintenance fees will go down since they'll be offset by the rent that the carrier would be paying them. She said she already voted in favor of it but she thinks that a lot of the older people in her building are against it.
    • Galaxy S7 FE most certainly doesn't have the same level of NR CA (if at all), it also looks like it doesn't have SA NR, so it's is inherently going to be much slower since most of the spectrum is now focused on NR rather than LTE. It's likely the same generation radio as the S21 (or maybe S20). Having trouble finding which it would be.
    • T-Mobile seems to be paying close attention to how much of B2 they refarm for NR, as on this trip down to South Padre Island I saw both 20x20 n25 and 20x20 B2 (but not both simultaneously) at various points on the trip. At South Padre itself, seems like someone else has 2.5 GHz licensed so the n41 setup here is 20+80 MHz. Speeds are still decent, but VZW has 100+60 MHz n77 live (and AT&T has some 80+40).
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...