Jump to content

Sprint Roaming+ - Coverage Map Update


clbowens

Recommended Posts

I would be willing to pay more in the form of an add on data pack similar to international data offerings already available.

 

Years ago, Sprint offered a la carte (voice) roaming packs.  That might be a good idea again for data.

 

AJ 

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with that, maybe set amount for each 1gb of roaming data

 

How does $25 sound?

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problems uscc being lte roaming, I would like a higher cap then 100/300 mbs on the roaming though

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time, and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte.  As AJ says 25 bucks for 1gb would be good for me :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time, and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte.  As AJ says 25 bucks for 1gb would be good for me :D

 

Your data might go faster on LTE, but your roaming data quota would not get used up faster.  That would be on you -- something that you do not have to do.  Let us make that perfectly clear.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont care about the streaming video, my previous job I traveled a lot into roaming areas. I would come close to the 300 all the time,

And that type of situation is what the last sentence in my post was directed towards. Here in Omaha we are in a great situation to benefit from the US Cellular Roaming deal (look at the coverage map for why). However, I don't and still wouldn't recommend Sprint to friends or family that regularly travel to smaller cities for work. If you find yourself hitting or coming close to hitting the roaming cap "all the time" to me that is a sign you need a different carrier.

 and that was on 3G. I can only imagine, how fast it would go with lte. 

Echoing AJ, 300 MB is 300 MB. I tried showed how much "regular" stuff you could do with 300 MB in a week assuming vacation usage. LTE just lets you accomplish those tasks quicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And that type of situation is what the last sentence in my post was directed towards. Here in Omaha we are in a great situation to benefit from the US Cellular Roaming deal (look at the coverage map for why). However, I don't and still wouldn't recommend Sprint to friends or family that regularly travel to smaller cities for work. If you find yourself hitting or coming close to hitting the roaming cap "all the time" to me that is a sign you need a different carrier.

Echoing AJ, 300 MB is 300 MB. I tried showed how much "regular" stuff you could do with 300 MB in a week assuming vacation usage. LTE just lets you accomplish those tasks quicker.

Sprint works for me when I'm home great. But there's no doubt when I leave the interstates in Iowa for occasional weeks on rural jobs, I turn on my work phone mobile hotspot to keep me from going over the cap.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC using B5 for LTE?  Im near USCC territory and go into their territory a few times a year.  At least I'll have 3G now which is veryable usable which will be good, but still just wondering.

 

East TN between Cleveland and Knoxville and then West North Carolina west of Ashville.  Anyone know if these areas are using B5 and/or B12 LTE?

 

If it is B12, just another reason to upgrade phones sooner. :-D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

USCC using B5 for LTE?  Im near USCC territory and go into their territory a few times a year.  At least I'll have 3G now which is veryable usable which will be good, but still just wondering.

 

East TN between Cleveland and Knoxville and then West North Carolina west of Ashville.  Anyone know if these areas are using B5 and/or B12 LTE?

 

If it is B12, just another reason to upgrade phones sooner. :-D

I would like to know for eastern NC?  :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I don't know... 100 may be on the stingy side on the newer plans, but I fail to see how 300 isn't enough. A fairly common roaming situation is someone on vacation for a week or someone going back to visit family for a week in a non-native coverage area. 300 MB still allows you to send 400 emails, visit 200 we pages, and upload 200 pictures to social media. It isn't going to allow you to slingbox back to your TV at home or stream Netflix, but nor should it for that matter. If people find themselves needing more than 300 MB in roaming on a regular (or even somewhat infrequent basis) a different carrier may be needed for them.

 

Im curious about what they define as a webpage size.

 

Ive noticed that every month my data usage inches up, with my usage pattern being the same. According to my phone, it is Google Chrome that is using up the most data.

 

That leads me to the conclusion that webpages are becoming more and more data hungry. The developers add more and more bloat without considering data usage.

 

The NYT had an article recently on how ads are exploding the size of webpages

 

Thanks to ads, the Boston.com homepage takes up almost 20MB on a single load.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/01/business/cost-of-mobile-ads.html

 

Visiting that home page just 5 times would blow through your monthly roaming allocation.

 

Thats insane.

 

And unfortunately, from the user end, we have no idea how much data any given webpage will take up before we visit it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eastern NC could be either one (they own licenses for both) but they only own CLR/B5 in TN so you should be good with a B5 phone there.

 

Im a dummy, I could have looked that up.  In West North Carolina USCC does have 700 A+B in Cherokee/Ashiville area, but even further west (which Im more interested in) they only have 700B.  So my Nexus 5 is golden there for the most part.  Phew

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Click thumbnail for full resolution.

 

Nationwide LTE roaming (without Roaming+):

 

lteroam-no-plus-small.png

 

Kansas LTE Roaming+ (without extended roaming):

 

roamplus-ks-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE Roaming+ (without extended roaming):

 

roamplus-ms-small.png

 

As of right now, selecting device-specific coverage reverts to showing LTE coverage without roaming; however, I found some additional tile sets, denoted only as groups 1-4, which may indicate device-specific, partner-specific, or account-specific coverage.

 

Nationwide LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-group1-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-group2-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-group3-small.png

 

Nationwide LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-group4-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group1-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group2-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group3-small.png

 

Kansas LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-ks-group4-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (no group):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 1):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group1-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 2):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group2-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 3):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group3-small.png

 

Mississippi LTE+ (group 4):

 

spark-roamplus-ms-group4-small.png

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im a dummy, I could have looked that up.  In West North Carolina USCC does have 700 A+B in Cherokee/Ashiville area, but even further west (which Im more interested in) they only have 700B.  So my Nexus 5 is golden there for the most part.  Phew

 

The Nexus 5 does not support band 12, so it will not attach to any USCC LTE 700.

 

AJ

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of right now, selecting device-specific coverage reverts to showing LTE coverage without roaming; however, I found some additional tile sets, denoted only as groups 1-4, which may indicate device-specific, partner-specific, or account-specific coverage.

 

These seem like they may be device specific. Perhaps according to what bands specific devices are able to connect to. Maybe Sprint is still programming each device into their respective group in order to display it correctly. Those of us with  phones with all compatible bands like the Nexus 6, GS6, etc look like we end up in the "No Group" section.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These seem like they may be device specific. Perhaps according to what bands specific devices are able to connect to. Perhaps Sprint is still programming each device into their respective group in order to display it correctly. Those of us with  phones with all compatible bands like the Nexus 6, GS6, etc look like we end up in the "No Group" section.

 

For Nex-Tech Wireless in western Kansas, I suspect the groupings are some mix of band 2 and band 12, maybe band 25, too.  I suppose I should use my tech editor s4gru.com e-mail address to send an official inquiry to Nex-Tech.

 

AJ

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Click thumbnail for full resolution.

 

Nationwide LTE roaming (without Roaming+):

 

lteroam-no-plus-small.png

 

I'm still sorta confused why there are huge chunks of LTE roaming on USCC missing in eastern Oregon. It doesn't seem to be a band issue...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still sorta confused why there are huge chunks of LTE roaming on USCC missing in eastern Oregon. It doesn't seem to be a band issue...

They're still rolling out lte roaming. This is a by all means a soft launch to get things rolling.

 

When it's truly ready we'll definitely see marcelo making a big announcement of it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...