Jump to content

Sprint "Open World" plan (replaces International Value Roaming)


Recommended Posts

Posted

Normally I'd say that's fine, but Google maps doesn't even work at that speed (which is pretty much all I use my phone data for overseas). Most of the time things just time out instead at 64kbps.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

You do have to actually get nearly the full 64kb/s speed for what I said to be true.  Google Maps works at that speed as long as you do not go to satellite view.  If you are only getting 10kbps or slower either up or down then almost nothing will work.  I experienced this lack of data several times when I roamed on Verizon CDMA.  I expect slow GSM has the same problem.  This is why LTE roaming is so important.  It is much more likely that you will get the full roaming speed or close to it when roaming on LTE.

Posted

I should have noted that it works in some places. Vancouver is one that it did really well. I think it depends on how they handle the throttling.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

When you roam on another network, it all depends on how good the network is in that area, just like using any carrier in the US. If the network is shitty, nothing Sprint can do about it. People need to have perspectives before they start ranting.

  • Like 1
Posted

To go along with this new plan, I see that they added a few more countries to the roaming list such as Belize and Saudi Arabia. It also appears that both sides of St. Maarten are now covered (something that has caused some consternation for a few people) along with Saba and Sint Eustatius (Statia), though the map hasn't been completely updated to reflect the latter two. Actually the entire map seems sorta borked currently as it paints just about every country in green whether there's a Global Roaming agreement or not (ex: Vietnam, Nepal). The biggest omissions now seem to be on the African continent though I imagine that most of those countries aren't particularly high on many customers' vacation lists.

Posted

For Google Maps on a slow connection, I'd strongly encourage downloading an offline area when you're on WiFi or before you travel; that way all you need to use data for is traffic and other updates, which should be usable enough.

Posted

Not necessarily. If one only plans to use 1 GB or less in Latin America and/or they plan to do a fair amount of talking on the phone then yes, Open World is probably the superior option. However, at 2 GB of usage and above this new Global Roaming plan quickly starts looking more appealing especially considering $25/week for unlimited (whatever that means in this case) at 4G speeds vs $30/GB at 3G speeds. Again, it depends on the individual user. It's impossible to please all of the people all of the time. If you feel that Open World is better for your needs then keep it, problem solved.

Posted

Normally I'd say that's fine, but Google maps doesn't even work at that speed (which is pretty much all I use my phone data for overseas). Most of the time things just time out instead at 64kbps.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

If you only like to use GMaps, cache the maps.  Or something something like HERE (which is very good) so you can download an entire country's map.  Don't have to worry about speed and save some data. 

Posted

It's impossible to please all of the people all of the time.

 

Incorrect. It's called offering options. Which Sprint has done for years with the Open World OR Global Roaming Plan.

 

For Latin America, this is a price hike, plain and simple.

Posted

Incorrect. It's called offering options. Which Sprint has done for years with the Open World OR Global Roaming Plan.

 

For Latin America, this is a price hike, plain and simple.

 

And when Sprint did that people in this very thread were complaining about confusion. So like I said, it's impossible to please all of the people all of the time.

 

To your other point, things are usually not "plain and simple". Again, it depends on usage. If someone uses 2 GB in Latin America that's $30  under Open World. Under the new Global Roaming it's $25. So in that scenario how is that a price hike?

  • Like 1
Posted

And when Sprint did that people in this very thread were complaining about confusion. So like I said, it's impossible to please all of the people all of the time.

 

To your other point, things are usually not "plain and simple". Again, it depends on usage. If someone uses 2 GB in Latin America that's $30  under Open World. Under the new Global Roaming it's $25. So in that scenario how is that a price hike?

 

Because calls are no longer free.

 

Also, it is $25 per WEEK. The $30 was for the entire month.

 

If you use 1GB over the course of a month, it would now be $100, vs $0 before.

 

That's a massive price hike.

Posted

Because calls are no longer free.

 

Also, it is $25 per WEEK. The $30 was for the entire month.

 

If you use 1GB over the course of a month, it would now be $100, vs $0 before.

 

That's a massive price hike.

 

Again, depends on usage. I don't know what's so hard to understand about that. I'd venture to say that the average person doesn't vacation for a month. However, even for someone who does, are they really going to stay under 1 GB of data usage for the entire month? If you use 10 GB, for example, over the course of a month it would be $300 on Open World (which still isn't terrible IMO) vs $100. Or if you don't want to pay for the high speed data, don't take the buy-up. That's an option. Or keep Open World, that's also an option that they're offering.

Posted

Incorrect. It's called offering options. Which Sprint has done for years with the Open World OR Global Roaming Plan.

 

For Latin America, this is a price hike, plain and simple.

It is a price hike. But it was always a limited time offer. I remember when it came out, the fine print stated that the add on was only for a limited time. As long as you have it as an add-on, Sprint won't take it away.
Posted

To note this is designed as a convenience for people who vacation, not for long term stays. If you're going to really be abroad for over a month, they definitely are pushing you to get a local SIM. Sprint even states that they are not to be your foreign provider.

Posted

To note this is designed as a convenience for people who vacation, not for long term stays. If you're going to really be abroad for over a month, they definitely are pushing you to get a local SIM. Sprint even states that they are not to be your foreign provider.

Yep. They mention that they have the right to terminate service if a majority of your usage in any given month is roaming.

Posted

Again, depends on usage. I don't know what's so hard to understand about that. I'd venture to say that the average person doesn't vacation for a month. However, even for someone who does, are they really going to stay under 1 GB of data usage for the entire month? If you use 10 GB, for example, over the course of a month it would be $300 on Open World (which still isn't terrible IMO) vs $100. Or if you don't want to pay for the high speed data, don't take the buy-up. That's an option. Or keep Open World, that's also an option that they're offering.

 

My sister has been in Colombia for 3 weeks. I told her about the 1GB limit. She is at .56

 

So I am not speaking in hypotheticals here.

 

Our current cost is $0. The new plan would be $75. Thats outrageous.

 

Posted

My sister has been in Colombia for 3 weeks. I told her about the 1GB limit. She is at .56

 

So I am not speaking in hypotheticals here.

 

Our current cost is $0. The new plan would be $75. Thats outrageous.

 

That's all well and good. Yet, I never claimed that the new Global Roaming will be better/cheaper for all people in all circumstances. Indeed, I've stated several times that it will depend on one's usage. Kudos to your sister for only using half a gig in three weeks. However, it seems just as likely that there will be customers who find it valuable and perhaps even cost effective to have 4G speeds instead of 3G and to not worry about having to watch the meter. Clearly you're not one of those people so they give you the option to stay on Open World. Seems win-win.

 

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk

Posted

My sister has been in Colombia for 3 weeks. I told her about the 1GB limit. She is at .56

 

So I am not speaking in hypotheticals here.

 

Our current cost is $0. The new plan would be $75. Thats outrageous.

 

I just returned from Colombia as well and Open World worked pretty good. Speeds weren't great but I had no issues using my phone as I usually do. I was also keeping track of data so I didn't ho over. I only used half a g anyway. Luckily I have the old plan.

f41c232ff10fc46a1dfedfa31976a2da.jpga0bcad3ca42444043af9d39d8799d24e.jpg

 

Sent from my LGLS991 using Tapatalk

Posted (edited)

The wife is in the Dominican Republic and it's seems that the Global roaming plan blocks iMessage & MMS. Why?

 

We're both Sprint customers. Does T-Mobile do the same?

Edited by banananuts87
Posted

The wife is in the Dominican Republic and it's seems that the Global roaming plan blocks iMessage & MMS. Why?

 

We're both Sprint customers. Does T-Mobile do the same?

She probably has data roaming off. Tell her to check for that.
Posted

Just landed in Canada for the first time in 3 weeks. For the past year, I have been coming to Montreal, on average, every other week. Each time, my phone connected to Rogers 3G and stayed there.

 

Today upon landing, I am connected to Rogers LTE. I am sure the speed is still limited, but it sure is nice to see it say "LTE" instead of "3G" !

 

For reference, ED1500 plan with Sprint Open World.

  • Like 4
Posted

I'm going to Toronto at the end of May. What steps or plan do I need to do before arriving?

 

You don't have to do anything.  Sprint Global Roaming is already enabled onto your services.  Sprint Open World no longer exists.  If you want to buy High speed passes in most countries for $5/day or $25/week or Canada/Mexico for $2/day or $10/week.

 

https://www.sprint.com/en/shop/services/global-roaming.html?ECID=vanity:globalroaming

Posted

Yep. The full list of plans is here under the question labeled "Is Sprint Global Roaming limited to certain plans?"

 

https://support.sprint.com/support/article/FAQs_about_Sprint_Global_Roaming/8fc1976f-831b-44a4-ab93-d1b3c36c39a3

Has anyone noticed that the Unlimited LTE, Talk, and Text in Canada and Mexico has disappeared from the Global Roaming page and the FAQs? Does this mean it's been removed altogether?

Posted

Has anyone noticed that the Unlimited LTE, Talk, and Text in Canada and Mexico has disappeared from the Global Roaming page and the FAQs? Does this mean it's been removed altogether?

Huh...didn't notice that. Not sure...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Posts

    • It took a couple of months but this site is finally back online.  I was certain that a decommission permit would come through one day since it was offline for over 3 months but I passed by it today and it was working again. — — — — — This site is also finally live. This was probably the longest I had ever seen a site take to go live once all hardware was installed, about 3 months. Hopefully the site in Long Island City doesn't take as long.
    • So while we wait for @RAvirani to fix the website, I was able to connect one of my phones to Verizon n77 on a site with an NCI that appears to be adjacent to an NCI that was already in my database. Specifically, the site I call Taylor Run has been observed with these NCIs on n77: 44EEE469A 44EEE46AA 44EEE46AB 44EEE46BA 44EEE46BB I separately connected to the site I call Fairlington on its beta sector on n77: 44EEE46DA 44EEE46DB I'm assuming alpha sector is 44EE46CA/B.  With this data, I learned two things: 1) They're clearly not tracking the LTE GCIs with the NR NCIs.  Taylor Run is 1B61Fxx, while Fairlington is 1B680xx, not sequential. 2) It's clear that they're not using three byte sectors.  They're not even using two byte sectors like LTE does.  It looks to be done in an oddball fashion like how Dish is doing things.  Best I can come up with is a site ID that's something like: (NCI-0x20)/(0x30) It's possible it's actually (NCI+0x10)/(0x30) but I'm not really sure.  I also haven't connected to anything outside my immediate area here to know if this is consistent with other regions.  Not entirely sure how to persuade a device to do so, my Dish phone just connects to n77 at random in lieu of going to no signal.  (No data passes.) My take is to "break" the site notes for Verizon NR the way it was done with Dish NR, so at least the notes don't get copied to inconsistent sites, as has happened when I connected to Fairlington (came up as "Taylor Run").  It seems that Verizon, AT&T, and Dish all need work on the NR side to make sure site notes work properly.  Frustrating that they didn't standardize that for NR the way they did for LTE.  T-Mobile and US Cellular (while it lasts) seem to have done it the way I would have done it.  The others, not so much. - Trip
    • I tried to access that forum but it says I need a password. Is it limit to certain contributors?    I was going to report that the website is broken. For days it's been saying unable to retrieve signal data then going to a 404 error.
    • Sorry, I forgot about it when I posted previously.  And then I was talking to chamb by e-mail and away from my computer and suggested posting here.  Moved the posts to the proper spot. - Trip
    • It is probably better to post topics related to the map in the dedicated thread to help keep things organized and secure. This thread is big enough as it is, just want to try help keep things on track!
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...