payturr Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 This morning has been nothing but pure hype for Sprint. Good numbers, confirmation on multiple things, Tim's B25 teaser on the subreddit... High times for Sprint subs ahead. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 "Alot of our sites are either 1.9 only, or 800 and 1.9...we are going to upgrade NEARLY ALL of our existing sites to tri-band". I would interpret this to mean they are going to make every macro site support all three bands, except those that cannot for logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons. Hopefully this means the end of the GMO is nigh. Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk 16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamisonshaw125 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 This morning has been nothing but pure hype for Sprint. Good numbers, confirmation on multiple things, Tim's B25 teaser on the subreddit... High times for Sprint subs ahead. I just saw this....IIRC Orlando is one of those special markets that can pull something like that off. AJ posted the chart somewhere a while back but I don't have a link to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bretton88 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 I would interpret this to mean they are going to make every macro site support all three bands, except those that cannot for logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons. Hopefully this means the end of the GMO is nigh. Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk This would make me the happiest person ever. Hopefully it happens soon. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 I would interpret this to mean they are going to make every macro site support all three bands, except those that cannot for logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons. Hopefully this means the end of the GMO is nigh. But aren't most (or all) of the GMO sites GMOs because of pretty much those same logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons? So wouldn't that leave the GMOs in the same situation they're currently in? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bretton88 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 But aren't most (or all) of the GMO sites GMOs because of pretty much those same logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons? So wouldn't that leave the GMOs in the same situation they're currently in?No, a lot of GMOs are in rural areas, that are very capable of being upgraded to Tri-Band. But because they are low use sites, the decision was made to not fully upgrade them. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmoses Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 But aren't most (or all) of the GMO sites GMOs because of pretty much those same logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons? So wouldn't that leave the GMOs in the same situation they're currently in? some yes, but not all, just look at Iowa. I would say 90% of our GMO sites are that way just because they were low priority so someone decided to make them that way. heck most (all?) of the GMO sites around the des moines metro even have fiber already run to them, which helps out 3G speeds, but no signs of upgrading them to get LTE going. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 But aren't most (or all) of the GMO sites GMOs because of pretty much those same logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons? So wouldn't that leave the GMOs in the same situation they're currently in?No. Most, probably around 90% of remaining GMO's are the lowest priority sites. They just are GMO because of cost/benefit analysis. Especially ones in areas where there are no full builds around, just a bunch of GMO's. Where you see one GMO off by itself surrounded by full builds are the ones with 'other' issues. But GMO's in clusters are low priority sites and were waiting for future funding. It sounds like the future is finally coming. Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrell352 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 No. Most, probably around 90% of remaining GMO's are the lowest priority sites. They just are GMO because of cost/benefit analysis. Especially ones in areas where there are no full builds around, just a bunch of GMO's. Where you see one GMO off by itself surrounded by full builds are the ones with 'other' issues. But GMO's in clusters are low priority sites and were waiting for future funding. It sounds like the future is finally coming. Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk Are GMR sites capable of band 41? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidtm Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 What, no special shout-out to those of us in nTelos-land? ;-) Sent from my HTC One M9 on Tapatalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S4GRU Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 Are GMR sites capable of band 41? Yes, a GMR/GMO site can add B41 easily, as long as the site structurally can handle the added weight and wind load. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimBob Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 Key takeaway for Sprint shareholders is that the liquidity question has been answered by the external SoftBank-backed cash machines to be used for financing customer devices and network gear. Less worry now about cash flow and stock dilution. SoftBank shareholders might be miffed about giving away more money to Sprint in this roundabout way, but raising Sprint value is to ultimately raise the parent's value as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigsnake49 Posted August 4, 2015 Share Posted August 4, 2015 (edited) I am so glad that their former CFO is gone! In some ways he was hamstringing Sprint. Along with the board. Edited August 4, 2015 by bigsnake49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 BTW for anyone wanting to read the transcript: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3397085-sprint-s-r-marcelo-claure-on-q1-2015-results-earnings-call-transcript if it prompts you to login: Username: fabskxha@guerrillamail.com Pass: bugmenot 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jones Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 So the leasing company Sprint and Softbank will set up is supposed to arrange and finance handset leasing. The leasing company operates at net 0 profit but will take a significant load of payments off of Sprint's books thereby creating + free cash flow. Masa had said that he did this with Softbank and it has worked very well for his company. That's what I got from the financial part of the transcript. Did I interpret it correctly? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cletus Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 So the leasing company Sprint and Softbank will set up is supposed to arrange and finance handset leasing. The leasing company operates at net 0 profit but will take a significant load of payments off of Sprint's books thereby creating + free cash flow. Masa had said that he did this with Softbank and it has worked very well for his company. That's what I got from the financial part of the transcript. Did I interpret it correctly? That is how I understood it as well. Neat and tidy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshuam Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 So the leasing company Sprint and Softbank will set up is supposed to arrange and finance handset leasing. The leasing company operates at net 0 profit but will take a significant load of payments off of Sprint's books thereby creating + free cash flow. Masa had said that he did this with Softbank and it has worked very well for his company. That's what I got from the financial part of the transcript. Did I interpret it correctly? Correct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coccydynia Posted August 5, 2015 Share Posted August 5, 2015 That is how I understood it as well. Neat and tidy. The benefits of what Softbank is arranging for sprint is simply less interest paid. If Sprint tried to finance the phone leasing themselves, they will have to pay more than by having Softbank (and whoever they're working with) loan it to them. The collateral used are the monthly leasing payment + the value of the phones themselves and Softbank is co-signing so the loan is less risky. It's not some free money hand out to Sprint but every bit helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geesmill Posted August 6, 2015 Share Posted August 6, 2015 I would interpret this to mean they are going to make every macro site support all three bands, except those that cannot for logistic, structural, municipal or technical reasons. Hopefully this means the end of the GMO is nigh. Using Nexus 6 on Tapatalk As a person in a GMO area, I certainly hope so. The day when I stop roaming off of VZW and ATT/Alltel will be great. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.