Jump to content
nexuss4g

Moto X 2015 "Pure Edition" [users thread]

Recommended Posts

uploadfromtaptalk1438726090951.png

 

Sent from my Sprint LG G4

  • Like 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes please! I know what I'm getting for my birthday!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't I tell you that it was going to work with Sprint?  :rolleyes:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't I tell you that it was going to work with Sprint? :rolleyes:

Good to know Sprint is onboard. Hopefully more OEM's jump the direct-sales bandwagon with quality multiband unlocked devices. Win-win.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A win for the whitelisting of compatible devices.  Thanks, Marcelo!

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just FYI, staff has known for several weeks that the tested RF performance of this Moto X is only about average. In other words, not great. It may be a jack of all trades, master of none. We will run an update to our existing article, write a follow up article, or post here with ERP/EIRP figures -- once we have confirmed with Sprint that this handset will be whitelisted.

 

AJ

Now that it has been confirmed when can we expect an update on the article or an official write up? And are the figures close to Nexus 6 or less than?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that it has been confirmed when can we expect an update on the article or an official write up?

 

Soon™.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just FYI, staff has known for several weeks that the tested RF performance of this Moto X is only about average. In other words, not great. It may be a jack of all trades, master of none. We will run an update to our existing article, write a follow up article, or post here with ERP/EIRP figures -- once we have confirmed with Sprint that this handset will be whitelisted.

 

AJ

That's interesting. Did they get rid of the dynamic antenna that was supposed to help out with that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting. Did they get rid of the dynamic antenna that was supposed to help out with that?

They probably removed that feature to cut costs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They probably removed that feature to cut costs. 

Please say that isn't the case when it is officially released. That is a major pain point for devices as they lose signal just from picking up the device! I hope that isn't the case one reason I really wanted last years Moto X 2014 model.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's interesting. Did they get rid of the dynamic antenna that was supposed to help out with that?

 

Yeah, that possibility crossed my mind, too.  Fortunately, we will know for certain at some point.  Since the 2015 Moto X is operator agnostic and exclusively sold unlocked, AnandTech surely will do an extensive review, including a breakdown of the RF components.

 

In the meantime, staff here is working on putting together a side by side comparison of the FCC OET RF testing figures for the 2015 Moto X, Nexus 6, and 2014 Moto X.

 

AJ

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly as long as performance stays consistent I would be fine with a just average radio. But that's just me coming from a Nexus 5 whose radio seemingly got nerfed and the iPhone 6 which has had a crappy carrier update for the summer...we will see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You asked for a comparison -- you got it.

 

 

AJ

 

 

 [/size]

Those numbers aren't discouraging! On par and between the two devices for the necessary bands for Sprint it appears but slightly depressed overall as you said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was worried it would be closer to the results of the SGS6, which at $250  cheaper than the former's msrp, is much more acceptable for me. Only gripe really would be lack of fingerprint sensor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Those numbers aren't discouraging! On par and between the two devices for the necessary bands for Sprint it appears but slightly depressed overall as you said.

 

No, they are not bad.  They are what I would call average.  I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent.  For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they are not bad. They are what I would call average. I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent. For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

Can someone either explain or link me to an article that explains the significance of the numbers above in context. I've been looking, but can't find much of an explanation and I know we have people who enjoy helping those less fortunate (me in this case). Any takers?
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, they are not bad.  They are what I would call average.  I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent.  For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

This may be true, but it will be a definite upgrade to my HTC one m8! I noticed that it drops off in fringe situations on band 41 a lot faster than my partners LG g3! That's something I would appreciate not happen as often.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AJ, how do the numbers compare to the Galaxy S4T?  I'm looking at an upgrade in the next 8 weeks and I'm really impressed with the specs, etc for this device.  I just need something that is comparable to my current phone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AJ, how do the numbers compare to the Galaxy S4T? I'm looking at an upgrade in the next 8 weeks and I'm really impressed with the specs, etc for this device. I just need something that is comparable to my current phone.

Comparable how? According to the numbers, RF performance is really the only thing that the S4T outclasses the new Moto X in.

 

Sent from my M8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comparable how? According to the numbers, RF performance is really the only thing that the S4T outclasses the new Moto X in.

 

Sent from my M8

RF is my concern, how large is the gap between S4T and the Moto X Pure in the OET docs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moto X Pure available 09/03/15

 

It’s all happening September 3rd. 21MP camera. 30hr battery on 1 charge. Octa/Hexa core processor. 5.7in Quad HD Display. http://bit.ly/1J3S5ZZ #MotoX#MyMoto

 

 

Source: https://plus.google.com/+Motorola/posts/NLVymP7iiWV

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RF is my concern, how large is the gap between S4T and the Moto X Pure in the OET docs?

No idea on the S4T numbers, but here's the Moto X 2015 RF comparisons with the previous devices.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/7063-moto-x-2015/?p=435129

 

The S4T had great RF performance, possibly the best tri-band device on Sprint's network (aside from the N5.)  But the article (and FCC doc) does not show the values needed to judge.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-356-teaser-samsung-galaxy-s4-2-3/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

    • By nexuss4g
      Network bands (by model)
      4G LTE (Cat11 DL, Cat5 UL)
      CDMA / EVDO Rev A
      UMTS / HSPA+
      GSM / EDGE
      2G: GSM band 2/3/5/8
      CDMA BC 0/1/10
      3G: WCDMA band 1/2/4/5/8
      4G: FDD LTE band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/20/25/26/28/66
      TDD LTE band 38/41
       
      https://www.motorola.com/us/products/moto-x-gen-4
       
       
    • By haasbat
      Not sure if this has come up elsewhere, regarding the Moto X/M leak a few weeks ago (just move it if it has), but I can't seem to find any information on the SOC that is being reported. Only thing I seem to find is that it's Cat-6 compatible, but it doesn't appear that this chipset is used in any existing Sprint phones (or other US phone, seems only to be overseas) to get an idea of how well the radios work and what the connectivity would be like.
       
      https://gfxbench.com/device.jsp?benchmark=gfx40&os=Android&api=gl&D=Motorola+XT1663&testgroup=info
       
      Obviously, it would only have 2-band CA as well as other limitations, but do we have anything comparable to this to give us an idea if we should be watching for a mid-range phone that will be hitting above its weight class? Or should we all just suck it up and go with the next Nexus and the Snapdragon 82X? I'm really gunning for the 4.6" Moto, but if the reception is lacking (whether LTE or WiFi), or it's not Sprint LTE Plus compatible, I'd rather just not waste my time. I'm still rocking my 2013 Moto X, I just really wish it were LTE Plus at this point, with a little bit better RAM management.
    • By nexuss4g
      The Moto G also unlocked with full Sprint support
       
      Moto G—XT1625
      CDMA (850, 1900 MHz)
      GSM / GPRS / EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
      UMTS / HSPA+ (850, 900, 1700, 1900, 2100 MHz)
      4G LTE (B1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 25, 26, 41)
      Band coverage varies by model, country, and carrier.
       
      http://www.motorola.com/us/products/moto-g
    • By Geesmill
      Verge video on Moto's new headquarters and the upcoming 360 wearable.
       

  • Posts

    • With the new update Samsung Band Test1 brings up "NETWORK" menu(?).  I can get into the Band Selection by clicking the menu button in the top left. I have never used Band Selection menu before but that is what it says in the top center. I saw there were 7 different options I just figured I would let you know which seemed to work for me. No 5G in my area so I can't really test that part of the beta.
    • Band 5 LTE is being shut down to deploy NR in the CLR block. AT&T doesn't have free spectrum anywhere else. 
    • Well... They haven't been back to finish the tower. It's still looks the same today as it does when I took those pictures. According to someone from Reddit, which I shall take with a grain of salt, the crew made various safety violations on that tower and that they were probably kicked out of the market. So maybe that's why it remains unfinished? It does seem weird that they just up and left leaving wires just hanging. This is the photo I posted in /r/CellTowers   Side note: I noticed Band 5 LTE going away in some areas. A tower in Bittinger, MD previously had Band 5 LTE and now it no longer does. It still has band 2 and 17 and no aggregation, at least not with my phone. I think it used CA with my ZTE MF288 modem. The Band 2 has 15 MHz bandwidth and hits 80 Mbps no problem.
    • I finally got around to an actual test, in the same location, first with 5G enabled, 7.42 D/L and 0.07 U/l 45ms ping.  Then just a couple minutes later, after the reboot from switching to LTE/CDMA mode, 33.8 D/L and 6.31 U/L with a similar 44ms ping.  This was pretty far from the tower, but I've noticed similar differences in many locations.  Also, I have not had a verified connection to n71 in about 5 days, looking in the *#0011# screen, while a speedtest, or other data in use.
    • Another beta update to SignalCheck Pro is rolling out! Version 4.614b will appear on Google Play sometime over the next several hours. More 5G improvements, the accent color should be fixed, and several Samsung shortcut menus were added. Samsung users, please try all of the new shortcuts and let me know which ones are useful and what they lead to. Thank you!
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...