Jump to content

Moto X 2015 "Pure Edition" [users thread]


nexuss4g

Recommended Posts

Didn't I tell you that it was going to work with Sprint? :rolleyes:

Good to know Sprint is onboard. Hopefully more OEM's jump the direct-sales bandwagon with quality multiband unlocked devices. Win-win.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just FYI, staff has known for several weeks that the tested RF performance of this Moto X is only about average. In other words, not great. It may be a jack of all trades, master of none. We will run an update to our existing article, write a follow up article, or post here with ERP/EIRP figures -- once we have confirmed with Sprint that this handset will be whitelisted.

 

AJ

Now that it has been confirmed when can we expect an update on the article or an official write up? And are the figures close to Nexus 6 or less than?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now that it has been confirmed when can we expect an update on the article or an official write up?

 

Soon™.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just FYI, staff has known for several weeks that the tested RF performance of this Moto X is only about average. In other words, not great. It may be a jack of all trades, master of none. We will run an update to our existing article, write a follow up article, or post here with ERP/EIRP figures -- once we have confirmed with Sprint that this handset will be whitelisted.

 

AJ

That's interesting. Did they get rid of the dynamic antenna that was supposed to help out with that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They probably removed that feature to cut costs. 

Please say that isn't the case when it is officially released. That is a major pain point for devices as they lose signal just from picking up the device! I hope that isn't the case one reason I really wanted last years Moto X 2014 model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's interesting. Did they get rid of the dynamic antenna that was supposed to help out with that?

 

Yeah, that possibility crossed my mind, too.  Fortunately, we will know for certain at some point.  Since the 2015 Moto X is operator agnostic and exclusively sold unlocked, AnandTech surely will do an extensive review, including a breakdown of the RF components.

 

In the meantime, staff here is working on putting together a side by side comparison of the FCC OET RF testing figures for the 2015 Moto X, Nexus 6, and 2014 Moto X.

 

AJ

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly as long as performance stays consistent I would be fine with a just average radio. But that's just me coming from a Nexus 5 whose radio seemingly got nerfed and the iPhone 6 which has had a crappy carrier update for the summer...we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You asked for a comparison -- you got it.

 

 

AJ

 

 

 [/size]

Those numbers aren't discouraging! On par and between the two devices for the necessary bands for Sprint it appears but slightly depressed overall as you said.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those numbers aren't discouraging! On par and between the two devices for the necessary bands for Sprint it appears but slightly depressed overall as you said.

 

No, they are not bad.  They are what I would call average.  I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent.  For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they are not bad. They are what I would call average. I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent. For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

Can someone either explain or link me to an article that explains the significance of the numbers above in context. I've been looking, but can't find much of an explanation and I know we have people who enjoy helping those less fortunate (me in this case). Any takers?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, they are not bad.  They are what I would call average.  I just doubt that the 2015 Moto X will live up to the RF performance standards set by the 2014 Moto X and the Nexus 6.

 

Keep in mind that 2-3 dB differences may not seem like a lot, but if you look at the figures in mW instead, the differences become apparent.  For example, 20 dBm is 100 mW, while 23 dBm is 200 mW.

 

AJ

This may be true, but it will be a definite upgrade to my HTC one m8! I noticed that it drops off in fringe situations on band 41 a lot faster than my partners LG g3! That's something I would appreciate not happen as often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ, how do the numbers compare to the Galaxy S4T?  I'm looking at an upgrade in the next 8 weeks and I'm really impressed with the specs, etc for this device.  I just need something that is comparable to my current phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AJ, how do the numbers compare to the Galaxy S4T? I'm looking at an upgrade in the next 8 weeks and I'm really impressed with the specs, etc for this device. I just need something that is comparable to my current phone.

Comparable how? According to the numbers, RF performance is really the only thing that the S4T outclasses the new Moto X in.

 

Sent from my M8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparable how? According to the numbers, RF performance is really the only thing that the S4T outclasses the new Moto X in.

 

Sent from my M8

RF is my concern, how large is the gap between S4T and the Moto X Pure in the OET docs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moto X Pure available 09/03/15

 

It’s all happening September 3rd. 21MP camera. 30hr battery on 1 charge. Octa/Hexa core processor. 5.7in Quad HD Display. http://bit.ly/1J3S5ZZ #MotoX#MyMoto

 

 

Source: https://plus.google.com/+Motorola/posts/NLVymP7iiWV

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

RF is my concern, how large is the gap between S4T and the Moto X Pure in the OET docs?

No idea on the S4T numbers, but here's the Moto X 2015 RF comparisons with the previous devices.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/topic/7063-moto-x-2015/?p=435129

 

The S4T had great RF performance, possibly the best tri-band device on Sprint's network (aside from the N5.)  But the article (and FCC doc) does not show the values needed to judge.

http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-356-teaser-samsung-galaxy-s4-2-3/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • large.unreadcontent.png.6ef00db54e758d06

  • gallery_1_23_9202.png

  • Similar Content

  • Posts

    • Since this is kind of the general chat thread, I have to share this humorous story (at least it is to me): Since around February/March of this year, my S22U has been an absolute pain to charge. USB-C cables would immediately fall out and it progressively got worse and worse until it often took me a number of minutes to get the angle of the cable juuuussst right to get charging to occur at all (not exaggerating). The connection was so weak that even walking heavily could cause the cable to disconnect. I tried cleaning out the port with a stable, a paperclip, etc. Some dust/lint/dirt came out but the connection didn't improve one bit. Needless to say, this was a MONSTER headache and had me hating this phone. I just didn't have the finances right now for a replacement.  Which brings us to the night before last. I am angry as hell because I had spent five minutes trying to get this phone to charge and failed. I am looking in the port and I notice it doesn't look right. The walls look rough and, using a staple, the back and walls feel REALLY rough and very hard. I get some lint/dust out with the staple and it improves charging in the sense I can get it to charge but it doesn't remove any of the hard stuff. It's late and it's charging, so that's enough for now. I decide it's time to see if that hard stuff is part of the connector or not. More aggressive methods are needed! I work in a biochem lab and we have a lot of different sizes of disposable needles available. So, yesterday morning, while in the lab I grab a few different sizes of needles between 26AWG and 31 AWG. When I got home, I got to work and start probing the connector with the 26 AWG and 31 AWG needle. The stuff feels extremely hard, almost like it was part of the connector, but a bit does break off. Under examination of the bit, it's almost sandy with dust/lint embedded in it. It's not part of the connector but instead some sort of rock-hard crap! That's when I remember that I had done some rock hounding at the end of last year and in January. This involved lots of digging in very sandy/dusty soils; soils which bare more than a passing resemblance to the crap in the connector. We have our answer, this debris is basically compacted/cemented rock dust. Over time, moisture in the area combined with the compression from inserting the USB-C connector had turned it into cement. I start going nuts chiseling away at it with the 26 AWG needle. After about 5-10 minutes of constant chiseling and scraping with the 26AWG and 31AWG needles, I see the first signs of metal at the back of the connector. So it is metal around the outsides! Another 5 minutes of work and I have scraped away pretty much all of the crap in the connector. A few finishing passes with the 31AWG needle, a blast of compressed air, and it is time to see if this helped any. I plug my regular USB-C cable and holy crap it clicks into place; it hasn't done that since February! I pick up the phone and the cable has actually latched! The connector works pretty much like it did over a year ago, it's almost like having a brand new phone!
    • That's odd, they are usually almost lock step with TMO. I forgot to mention this also includes the September Security Update.
    • 417.55 MB September security update just downloaded here for S24+ unlocked   Edit:  after Sept security update install, checked and found a 13MB GP System update as well.  Still showing August 1st there however. 
    • T-Mobile is selling the rest of the 3.45GHz spectrum to Columbia Capital.  
    • Still nothing for my AT&T and Visible phones.
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...